Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Frank Hellmann

dblp:261/9646 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-5635-4949ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Generative modeling · 58% Graph learning · 42%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Energy systems and smart grids · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
1.012026
Network Measure-Enriched GNNs: A New Framework for Power Grid Stability Prediction · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2026
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
diffusion-based representation learning
0.912025
SDMG: Smoothing Your Diffusion Models for Powerful Graph Representation Learning · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.912025
SDMG: Smoothing Your Diffusion Models for Powerful Graph Representation Learning · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
graph diffusion model
0.912025
SDMG: Smoothing Your Diffusion Models for Powerful Graph Representation Learning · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph representation learning
0.912025
SDMG: Smoothing Your Diffusion Models for Powerful Graph Representation Learning · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

network measures · 2.0monte carlo sampling · 2.0spectral analysis · 0.9multi-scale smoothing loss · 0.9low-frequency encoding · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Network Measure-Enriched GNNs: A New Framework for Power Grid Stability Prediction
abstract
Facing climate change, the transformation to renewable energy poses stability challenges for power grids due to their reduced inertia and increased decentralization. Traditional dynamic stability assessments, crucial for safe grid operation with higher renewable shares, are computationally expensive and unsuitable for large-scale grids in the real world. Although multiple proofs in the network science have shown that network measures, which quantify the structural characteristics of networked dynamical systems, have the potential to facilitate basin stability prediction, no studies to date have demonstrated their ability to efficiently generalize to real-world grids. With recent breakthroughs in Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), we are surprised to find that there is still a lack of a common foundation about: Whether network measures can enhance GNNs' capability to predict dynamic stability and how they might help GNNs generalize to realistic grid topologies. In this paper, we conduct, for the first time, a comprehensive analysis of 48 network measures in GNN-based stability assessments, introducing two strategies for their integration into the GNN framework. We uncover that prioritizing measures with consistent distributions across different grids as the input or regarding measures as auxiliary supervised information improves the model's generalization ability to realistic grid topologies, even when models trained on only 20-node synthetic datasets are used. Our empirical results demonstrate a significant enhancement in model generalizability, increasing the$R^{2}$perforsmance from 66% to 83%. When evaluating the probabilistic stability indices on the realistic Texan grid model, GNNs reduce the time needed from 28,950 hours (Monte Carlo sampling) to just 0.06 seconds.
Junyou Zhu, Christian Nauck, Michael Lindner, Langzhou He, Philip S. Yu, Klaus-Robert Müller, Jürgen Kurths, Frank Hellmann
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.8
2025 SDMG: Smoothing Your Diffusion Models for Powerful Graph Representation Learning
abstract
Diffusion probabilistic models (DPMs) have recently demonstrated impressive generative capabilities. There is emerging evidence that their sample reconstruction ability can yield meaningful representations for recognition tasks. In this paper, we demonstrate that the objectives underlying generation and representation learning are not perfectly aligned. Through a spectral analysis, we find that minimizing the mean squared error (MSE) between the original graph and its reconstructed counterpart does not necessarily optimize representations for downstream tasks. Instead, focusing on reconstructing a small subset of features, specifically those capturing global information, proves to be more effective for learning powerful representations. Motivated by these insights, we propose a novel framework, the Smooth Diffusion Model for Graphs (SDMG), which introduces a multi-scale smoothing loss and low-frequency information encoders to promote the recovery of global, low-frequency details, while suppressing irrelevant high-frequency noise. Extensive experiments validate the effectiveness of our method, suggesting a promising direction for advancing diffusion models in graph representation learning.
Junyou Zhu, Langzhou He, Chao Gao 0001, Dongpeng Hou, Zhen Su 0002, Philip S. Yu, Jürgen Kurths, Frank Hellmann
ICML8