VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Qiujiang Jin
dblp:262/0458
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 4 first-author · 6 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
5 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 82% Learning theory · 18% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization › numerical computation › numerical optimization › second-order methods › newton's method
quasi-newton method |
2.2 | 3 | 2025 | Affine-Invariant Global Non-Asymptotic Convergence Analysis of BFGS under Self-Concordance · NeurIPS 2025 Non-asymptotic Global Convergence Analysis of BFGS with the Armijo-Wolfe Line Search · NeurIPS 2024 Sharpened Quasi-Newton Methods: Faster Superlinear Rate and Larger Local Convergence Neighborhood · ICML 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › numerical computation › numerical optimization › second-order methods › newton's method › quasi-newton method
BFGS |
1.3 | 2 | 2024 | Non-asymptotic Global Convergence Analysis of BFGS with the Armijo-Wolfe Line Search · NeurIPS 2024 Sharpened Quasi-Newton Methods: Faster Superlinear Rate and Larger Local Convergence Neighborhood · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › second-order optimization
quasi-newton method |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Online Learning Guided Curvature Approximation: A Quasi-Newton Method with Global Non-Asymptotic Superlinear Convergence · COLT 2023 Exploiting Local Convergence of Quasi-Newton Methods Globally: Adaptive Sample Size Approach · NeurIPS 2021 |
Mathematical optimization
convergence analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Affine-Invariant Global Non-Asymptotic Convergence Analysis of BFGS under Self-Concordance · NeurIPS 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › convergence analysis
non-asymptotic analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Affine-Invariant Global Non-Asymptotic Convergence Analysis of BFGS under Self-Concordance · NeurIPS 2025 |
Mathematical optimization
adaptive step size |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Adaptive and Optimal Second-order Optimistic Methods for Minimax Optimization · NeurIPS 2024 |
Mathematical optimization
line search |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Non-asymptotic Global Convergence Analysis of BFGS with the Armijo-Wolfe Line Search · NeurIPS 2024 |
Mathematical optimization
minimax optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Adaptive and Optimal Second-order Optimistic Methods for Minimax Optimization · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › convergence guarantees
superlinear convergence |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Online Learning Guided Curvature Approximation: A Quasi-Newton Method with Global Non-Asymptotic Superlinear Convergence · COLT 2023 |
Mathematical optimization › online optimization
online convex optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Online Learning Guided Curvature Approximation: A Quasi-Newton Method with Global Non-Asymptotic Superlinear Convergence · COLT 2023 |
Mathematical optimization
continuous optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Sharpened Quasi-Newton Methods: Faster Superlinear Rate and Larger Local Convergence Neighborhood · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › adaptive optimization
adaptive sample size |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Exploiting Local Convergence of Quasi-Newton Methods Globally: Adaptive Sample Size Approach · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
empirical risk minimization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Exploiting Local Convergence of Quasi-Newton Methods Globally: Adaptive Sample Size Approach · NeurIPS 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
BFGS · 1.3regret analysis · 1.3hybrid proximal extragradient · 1.3self-concordance analysis · 0.9line search · 0.9second-order information · 0.8optimistic method · 0.8armijo-wolfe line search · 0.8adaptive step size · 0.8greedy BFGS · 0.6quasi-newton method · 0.5adaptive sample size · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Affine-Invariant Global Non-Asymptotic Convergence Analysis of BFGS under Self-ConcordanceabstractIn this paper, we establish global non-asymptotic convergence guarantees for the BFGS quasi-Newton method without requiring strong convexity or the Lipschitz continuity of the gradient or Hessian. Instead, we consider the setting where the objective function is strictly convex and strongly self-concordant. For an arbitrary initial point and any arbitrary positive-definite initial Hessian approximation, we prove global linear and superlinear convergence guarantees for BFGS when the step size is determined using a line search scheme satisfying the weak Wolfe conditions. Moreover, all our global guarantees are affine-invariant, with the convergence rates depending solely on the initial error and the strongly self-concordant constant. Our results extend the global non-asymptotic convergence theory of BFGS beyond traditional assumptions and, for the first time, establish affine-invariant convergence guarantees—aligning with the inherent affine invariance of the BFGS method. Qiujiang Jin, Aryan Mokhtari |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2024 | Adaptive and Optimal Second-order Optimistic Methods for Minimax OptimizationabstractWe propose adaptive, line-search-free second-order methods with optimal rate of convergence for solving convex-concave min-max problems. By means of an adaptive step size, our algorithms feature a simple update rule that requires solving only one linear system per iteration, eliminating the need for line-search or backtracking mechanisms. Specifically, we base our algorithms on the optimistic method and appropriately combine it with second-order information. Moreover, distinct from common adaptive schemes, we define the step size recursively as a function of the gradient norm and the prediction error in the optimistic update. We first analyze a variant where the step size requires knowledge of the Lipschitz constant of the Hessian. Under the additional assumption of Lipschitz continuous gradients, we further design a parameter-free version by tracking the Hessian Lipschitz constant locally and ensuring the iterates remain bounded. We also evaluate the practical performance of our algorithm by comparing it to existing second-order algorithms for minimax optimization. Ruichen Jiang, Ali Kavis, Qiujiang Jin, Sujay Sanghavi, Aryan Mokhtari |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2024 | Non-asymptotic Global Convergence Analysis of BFGS with the Armijo-Wolfe Line SearchabstractIn this paper, we present the first explicit and non-asymptotic global convergence rates of the BFGS method when implemented with an inexact line search scheme satisfying the Armijo-Wolfe conditions. We show that BFGS achieves a global linear convergence rate of $(1 - \frac{1}{\kappa})^t$ for $\mu$-strongly convex functions with $L$-Lipschitz gradients, where $\kappa = \frac{L}{\mu}$ represents the condition number. Additionally, if the objective function's Hessian is Lipschitz, BFGS with the Armijo-Wolfe line search achieves a linear convergence rate that depends solely on the line search parameters, independent of the condition number. We also establish a global superlinear convergence rate of $\mathcal{O}((\frac{1}{t})^t)$. These global bounds are all valid for any starting point $x_0$ and any symmetric positive definite initial Hessian approximation matrix $B_0$, though the choice of $B_0$ impacts the number of iterations needed to achieve these rates. By synthesizing these results, we outline the first global complexity characterization of BFGS with the Armijo-Wolfe line search. Additionally, we clearly define a mechanism for selecting the step size to satisfy the Armijo-Wolfe conditions and characterize its overall complexity. Qiujiang Jin, Ruichen Jiang, Aryan Mokhtari |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2023 | Online Learning Guided Curvature Approximation: A Quasi-Newton Method with Global Non-Asymptotic Superlinear ConvergenceabstractQuasi-Newton algorithms are among the most popular iterative methods for solving unconstrained minimization problems, largely due to their favorable superlinear convergence property. However, existing results for these algorithms are limited as they provide either (i) a global convergence guarantee with an asymptotic superlinear convergence rate, or (ii) a local non-asymptotic superlinear rate for the case that the initial point and the initial Hessian approximation are chosen properly. In particular, no current analysis for quasi-Newton methods guarantees global convergence with an explicit superlinear convergence rate. In this paper, we close this gap and present the first globally convergent quasi-Newton method with an explicit non-asymptotic superlinear convergence rate. Unlike classical quasi-Newton methods, we build our algorithm upon the hybrid proximal extragradient method and propose a novel online learning framework for updating the Hessian approximation matrices. Specifically, guided by the convergence analysis, we formulate the Hessian approximation update as an online convex optimization problem in the space of matrices, and we relate the bounded regret of the online problem to the superlinear convergence of our method. Ruichen Jiang, Qiujiang Jin, Aryan Mokhtari |
COLT | 2 |
| 2022 | Sharpened Quasi-Newton Methods: Faster Superlinear Rate and Larger Local Convergence NeighborhoodabstractNon-asymptotic analysis of quasi-Newton methods have received a lot of attention recently. In particular, several works have established a non-asymptotic superlinear rate of $$\mathcal{O}((1/\sqrt{t})^t)$$ for the (classic) BFGS method by exploiting the fact that its error of Newton direction approximation approaches zero. Moreover, a greedy variant of the BFGS method was recently proposed which accelerates the convergence of BFGS by directly approximating the Hessian matrix, instead of Newton direction, and achieves a fast local quadratic convergence rate. Alas, the local quadratic convergence of Greedy-BFGS requires way more updates compared to the number of iterations that BFGS requires for a local superlinear rate. This is due to the fact that in Greedy-BFGS the Hessian is directly approximated and the Newton direction approximation may not be as accurate as the one for BFGS. In this paper, we close this gap and present a novel BFGS method that has the best of two worlds. More precisely, it leverages the approximation ideas of both BFGS and Greedy-BFGS to properly approximate both the Newton direction and the Hessian matrix. Our theoretical results show that our method out-performs both BFGS and Greedy-BFGS in terms of convergence rate, while it reaches its quadratic convergence rate with fewer steps compared to Greedy-BFGS. Numerical experiments on various datasets also confirm our theoretical findings. Qiujiang Jin, Alec Koppel, Ketan Rajawat, Aryan Mokhtari |
ICML | 1 |
| 2021 | Exploiting Local Convergence of Quasi-Newton Methods Globally: Adaptive Sample Size ApproachabstractIn this paper, we study the application of quasi-Newton methods for solving empirical risk minimization (ERM) problems defined over a large dataset. Traditional deterministic and stochastic quasi-Newton methods can be executed to solve such problems; however, it is known that their global convergence rate may not be better than first-order methods, and their local superlinear convergence only appears towards the end of the learning process. In this paper, we use an adaptive sample size scheme that exploits the superlinear convergence of quasi-Newton methods globally and throughout the entire learning process. The main idea of the proposed adaptive sample size algorithms is to start with a small subset of data points and solve their corresponding ERM problem within its statistical accuracy, and then enlarge the sample size geometrically and use the optimal solution of the problem corresponding to the smaller set as an initial point for solving the subsequent ERM problem with more samples. We show that if the initial sample size is sufficiently large and we use quasi-Newton methods to solve each subproblem, the subproblems can be solved superlinearly fast (after at most three iterations), as we guarantee that the iterates always stay within a neighborhood that quasi-Newton methods converge superlinearly. Numerical experiments on various datasets confirm our theoretical results and demonstrate the computational advantages of our method. Qiujiang Jin, Aryan Mokhtari |
NeurIPS | 1 |