Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lisa Schut

dblp:262/3618 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Learning theory · 42% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 25% Efficient and distributed learning · 15%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
accuracy estimation
0.512021
Speedy Performance Estimation for Neural Architecture Search · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds
0.512021
Speedy Performance Estimation for Neural Architecture Search · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning
neural architecture search
0.512021
Speedy Performance Estimation for Neural Architecture Search · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
PAC-Bayes bounds
0.512021
Speedy Performance Estimation for Neural Architecture Search · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian model selection
0.412020
A Bayesian Perspective on Training Speed and Model Selection · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization
0.412020
A Bayesian Perspective on Training Speed and Model Selection · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian model selection
marginal likelihood estimation
0.412020
A Bayesian Perspective on Training Speed and Model Selection · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent
0.112020
A Bayesian Perspective on Training Speed and Model Selection · NeurIPS 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

bayesian estimation · 0.5PAC-Bayes bounds · 0.5stochastic gradient descent · 0.4bayesian inference · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Exploring resource-rational planning under time pressure in online chess
Ionatan Kuperwajs, Evan M. Russek, Lisa Schut, Yotam Sagiv, Marcelo G. Mattar, Wei Ji Ma, Thomas L. Griffiths 0001
CogSci3
2025 Learning in online chess increases with more time spent thinking and diversity of experience
Lisa Schut, Evan M. Russek, Ionatan Kuperwajs, Marcelo G. Mattar, Wei Ji Ma, Thomas L. Griffiths 0001
CogSci1
2025 Hindsight Merging: Diverse Data Generation with Language Models
abstract
Pre-training a language model equips it with a broad understanding of the world, while fine- tuning refines it into a helpful assistant. However, fine-tuning does not exclusively enhance task- specific behaviors but also suppresses some of the beneficial variability from pre-training. This reduction in diversity is partly due to the optimization process, which theoretically decreases model entropy in exchange for task performance. To counteract this, we introduce hindsight merging, a technique that combines a fine-tuned model with a previous training checkpoint using linear interpolation to restore entropy and improve performance. Hindsight-merged models retain strong instruction-following capabilities and alignment while displaying increased diversity present in the base model. Additionally, this results in improved inference scaling, achieving a consistent 20-50% increase in pass@10 relative to the instruction tuned model across a coding benchmark and series of models. Our findings suggest that hindsight merging is an effective strategy for generating diverse generations that follow instructions.
Veniamin Veselovsky, Benedikt Stroebl, Gianluca M. Bencomo, Dilip Arumugam, Lisa Schut, Arvind Narayanan, Thomas L. Griffiths 0001
UAI5
2021 Generating Interpretable Counterfactual Explanations By Implicit Minimisation of Epistemic and Aleatoric Uncertainties
abstract
Counterfactual explanations (CEs) are a practical tool for demonstrating why machine learning classifiers make particular decisions. For CEs to be useful, it is important that they are easy for users to interpret. Existing methods for generating interpretable CEs rely on auxiliary generative models, which may not be suitable for complex datasets, and incur engineering overhead. We introduce a simple and fast method for generating interpretable CEs in a white-box setting without an auxiliary model, by using the predictive uncertainty of the classifier. Our experiments show that our proposed algorithm generates more interpretable CEs, according to IM1 scores (Van Looveren et al., 2019), than existing methods. Additionally, our approach allows us to estimate the uncertainty of a CE, which may be important in safety-critical applications, such as those in the medical domain.
Lisa Schut, Oscar Key, Rory McGrath, Luca Costabello, Bogdan Sacaleanu, Medb Corcoran, Yarin Gal
AISTATS1
2021 Speedy Performance Estimation for Neural Architecture Search
abstract
Reliable yet efficient evaluation of generalisation performance of a proposed architecture is crucial to the success of neural architecture search (NAS). Traditional approaches face a variety of limitations: training each architecture to completion is prohibitively expensive, early stopped validation accuracy may correlate poorly with fully trained performance, and model-based estimators require large training sets. We instead propose to estimate the final test performance based on a simple measure of training speed. Our estimator is theoretically motivated by the connection between generalisation and training speed, and is also inspired by the reformulation of a PAC-Bayes bound under the Bayesian setting. Our model-free estimator is simple, efficient, and cheap to implement, and does not require hyperparameter-tuning or surrogate training before deployment. We demonstrate on various NAS search spaces that our estimator consistently outperforms other alternatives in achieving better correlation with the true test performance rankings. We further show that our estimator can be easily incorporated into both query-based and one-shot NAS methods to improve the speed or quality of the search.
Robin Ru, Clare Lyle, Lisa Schut, Miroslav Fil, Mark van der Wilk, Yarin Gal
NeurIPS3
2020 A Bayesian Perspective on Training Speed and Model Selection
abstract
We take a Bayesian perspective to illustrate a connection between training speed and the marginal likelihood in linear models. This provides two major insights: first, that a measure of a model's training speed can be used to estimate its marginal likelihood. Second, that this measure, under certain conditions, predicts the relative weighting of models in linear model combinations trained to minimize a regression loss. We verify our results in model selection tasks for linear models and for the infinite-width limit of deep neural networks. We further provide encouraging empirical evidence that the intuition developed in these settings also holds for deep neural networks trained with stochastic gradient descent. Our results suggest a promising new direction towards explaining why neural networks trained with stochastic gradient descent are biased towards functions that generalize well.
Clare Lyle, Lisa Schut, Binxin Ru, Yarin Gal, Mark van der Wilk
NeurIPS2