Recommender systems are known to exhibit fairness issues, particularly on the product side, where products and their associated suppliers receive unequal exposure in recommended results. While this problem has been widely studied in traditional recommendation settings, its implications for bundle recommendation (BR) remain largely unexplored. This emerging task introduces additional complexity: recommendations are generated at the bundle level, yet user satisfaction and product (or supplier) exposure depend on both the bundle and the individual items it contains. Existing fairness frameworks and metrics designed for traditional recommender systems may not directly translate to this multi-layered setting. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive reproducibility study of product-side fairness in BR across three real-world datasets using four state-of-the-art BR methods. We analyze exposure disparities at both the bundle and item levels using multiple fairness metrics, uncovering important patterns. Our results show that exposure patterns differ notably between bundles and items, revealing the need for fairness interventions that go beyond bundle-level assumptions. We also find that fairness assessments vary considerably depending on the metric used, reinforcing the need for multi-faceted evaluation. Furthermore, user behavior plays a critical role: when users interact more frequently with bundles than with individual items, BR systems tend to yield fairer exposure distributions across both levels. Overall, our findings offer actionable insights for building fairer bundle recommender systems and establish a vital foundation for future research in this emerging domain.

In modern information retrieval (IR), going beyond accuracy is crucial for maintaining a healthy ecosystem, particularly in meeting fairness and diversity requirements. To address these needs, various datasets, algorithms, and evaluation methods have been developed. These algorithms are often tested with different metrics, datasets, and experimental settings, making comparisons inconsistent and challenging. Consequently, there is an urgent need for a comprehensive IR toolkit, enabling standardized assessments of fairness- and diversity-aware algorithms across IR tasks. To address these issues, we introduce an open-source standardized toolkit called FairDiverse. First, FairDiverse provides a comprehensive framework for incorporating fairness- and diversity-aware approaches, including pre-processing, in-processing, and post-processing methods, into different pipeline stages of IR. Second, FairDiverse enables the evaluation of 29 fairness, and diversity algorithms across 16 base models for two fundamental IR tasks-search and recommendation-facilitating the establishment of a comprehensive benchmark. Finally, FairDiverse is highly extensible, offering multiple APIs to enable IR researchers to quickly develop their own fairness- and diversity-aware IR models, and allows for fair comparisons with existing baselines. The project is open-sourced on GitHub:~ https://github.com/XuChen0427/FairDiverse.

Fairness-aware information retrieval (IR) has attracted growing attention, with numerous metrics and algorithms proposed. However, the complexity of fairness and IR systems makes it challenging to systematically summarize progress and identify future directions. Economics has long studied fairness and offers a system-oriented perspective that naturally captures societal and intertemporal trade-offs. In this tutorial, we first frame IR systems as specialized economic markets and reorganize fairness algorithms along three key economic dimensions: macro vs. micro, demand vs. supply, and short-term vs. long-term. Unlike prior fairness-aware tutorials, this economic lens not only provides a structured reframing of fairness-aware IR, but also points toward new opportunities by encouraging the use of economic tools to address open problems.

Next basket recommendation ( NBR) is a special type of sequential recommendation that is increasingly receiving attention. So far, most NBR studies have focused on optimizing the accuracy of the recommendation, whereas optimizing for beyond-accuracy metrics, e.g., item fairness and diversity remains largely unexplored. Recent studies into NBR have found a substantial performance difference between recommending repeat items and explore items. Repeat items contribute most of the users' perceived accuracy compared with explore items.