Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ivan Kondofersky
dblp:262/8869
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 67% Medical and health informatics · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
consensus clustering |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | longmixr: a tool for robust clustering of high-dimensional cross-sectional and longitudinal variables of mixed data types · Bioinform. 2024 |
Medical and health informatics › precision medicine
patient stratification |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | longmixr: a tool for robust clustering of high-dimensional cross-sectional and longitudinal variables of mixed data types · Bioinform. 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
statistical genetics |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | longmixr: a tool for robust clustering of high-dimensional cross-sectional and longitudinal variables of mixed data types · Bioinform. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
finite mixture modeling · 0.8consensus clustering · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | longmixr: a tool for robust clustering of high-dimensional cross-sectional and longitudinal variables of mixed data typesabstractSUMMARY: Accurate clustering of mixed data, encompassing binary, categorical, and continuous variables, is vital for effective patient stratification in clinical questionnaire analysis. To address this need, we present longmixr, a comprehensive R package providing a robust framework for clustering mixed longitudinal data using finite mixture modeling techniques. By incorporating consensus clustering, longmixr ensures reliable and stable clustering results. Moreover, the package includes a detailed vignette that facilitates cluster exploration and visualization. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The R package is freely available at https://cran.r-project.org/package=longmixr with detailed documentation, including a case vignette, at https://cellmapslab.github.io/longmixr/. Jonas Hagenberg, Monika Budde, Teodora Pandeva, Ivan Kondofersky, Sabrina K. Schaupp, Fabian J. Theis, Thomas G. Schulze, Nikola S. Müller, Urs Heilbronner, Richa Batra, Janine Knauer-Arloth |
Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2020 | Copy number aberrations from Affymetrix SNP 6.0 genotyping data - how accurate are commonly used prediction approaches?abstractCopy number aberrations (CNAs) are known to strongly affect oncogenes and tumour suppressor genes. Given the critical role CNAs play in cancer research, it is essential to accurately identify CNAs from tumour genomes. One particular challenge in finding CNAs is the effect of confounding variables. To address this issue, we assessed how commonly used CNA identification algorithms perform on SNP 6.0 genotyping data in the presence of confounding variables. We simulated realistic synthetic data with varying levels of three confounding variables-the tumour purity, the length of a copy number region and the CNA burden (the percentage of CNAs present in a profiled genome)-and evaluated the performance of OncoSNP, ASCAT, GenoCNA, GISTIC and CGHcall. Furthermore, we implemented and assessed CGHcall*, an adjusted version of CGHcall accounting for high CNA burden. Our analysis on synthetic data indicates that tumour purity and the CNA burden strongly influence the performance of all the algorithms. No algorithm can correctly find lost and gained genomic regions across all tumour purities. The length of CNA regions influenced the performance of ASCAT, CGHcall and GISTIC. OncoSNP, GenoCNA and CGHcall* showed little sensitivity. Overall, CGHcall* and OncoSNP showed reasonable performance, particularly in samples with high tumour purity. Our analysis on the HapMap data revealed a good overlap between CGHcall, CGHcall* and GenoCNA results and experimentally validated data. Our exploratory analysis on the TCGA HNSCC data revealed plausible results of CGHcall, CGHcall* and GISTIC in consensus HNSCC CNA regions. Code is available at https://github.com/adspit/PASCAL. Adriana Pitea, Ivan Kondofersky, Steffen Sass, Fabian J. Theis, Nikola S. Müller, Kristian Unger |
Briefings Bioinform. | 2 |