Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ivan Kondofersky

dblp:262/8869 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 67% Medical and health informatics · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
consensus clustering
0.812024
longmixr: a tool for robust clustering of high-dimensional cross-sectional and longitudinal variables of mixed data types · Bioinform. 2024
Medical and health informatics › precision medicine
patient stratification
0.812024
longmixr: a tool for robust clustering of high-dimensional cross-sectional and longitudinal variables of mixed data types · Bioinform. 2024
Bioinformatics and computational biology
statistical genetics
0.812024
longmixr: a tool for robust clustering of high-dimensional cross-sectional and longitudinal variables of mixed data types · Bioinform. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

finite mixture modeling · 0.8consensus clustering · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 longmixr: a tool for robust clustering of high-dimensional cross-sectional and longitudinal variables of mixed data types
abstract
SUMMARY: Accurate clustering of mixed data, encompassing binary, categorical, and continuous variables, is vital for effective patient stratification in clinical questionnaire analysis. To address this need, we present longmixr, a comprehensive R package providing a robust framework for clustering mixed longitudinal data using finite mixture modeling techniques. By incorporating consensus clustering, longmixr ensures reliable and stable clustering results. Moreover, the package includes a detailed vignette that facilitates cluster exploration and visualization. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The R package is freely available at https://cran.r-project.org/package=longmixr with detailed documentation, including a case vignette, at https://cellmapslab.github.io/longmixr/.
Jonas Hagenberg, Monika Budde, Teodora Pandeva, Ivan Kondofersky, Sabrina K. Schaupp, Fabian J. Theis, Thomas G. Schulze, Nikola S. Müller, Urs Heilbronner, Richa Batra, Janine Knauer-Arloth
Bioinform.4
2020 Copy number aberrations from Affymetrix SNP 6.0 genotyping data - how accurate are commonly used prediction approaches?
abstract
Copy number aberrations (CNAs) are known to strongly affect oncogenes and tumour suppressor genes. Given the critical role CNAs play in cancer research, it is essential to accurately identify CNAs from tumour genomes. One particular challenge in finding CNAs is the effect of confounding variables. To address this issue, we assessed how commonly used CNA identification algorithms perform on SNP 6.0 genotyping data in the presence of confounding variables. We simulated realistic synthetic data with varying levels of three confounding variables-the tumour purity, the length of a copy number region and the CNA burden (the percentage of CNAs present in a profiled genome)-and evaluated the performance of OncoSNP, ASCAT, GenoCNA, GISTIC and CGHcall. Furthermore, we implemented and assessed CGHcall*, an adjusted version of CGHcall accounting for high CNA burden. Our analysis on synthetic data indicates that tumour purity and the CNA burden strongly influence the performance of all the algorithms. No algorithm can correctly find lost and gained genomic regions across all tumour purities. The length of CNA regions influenced the performance of ASCAT, CGHcall and GISTIC. OncoSNP, GenoCNA and CGHcall* showed little sensitivity. Overall, CGHcall* and OncoSNP showed reasonable performance, particularly in samples with high tumour purity. Our analysis on the HapMap data revealed a good overlap between CGHcall, CGHcall* and GenoCNA results and experimentally validated data. Our exploratory analysis on the TCGA HNSCC data revealed plausible results of CGHcall, CGHcall* and GISTIC in consensus HNSCC CNA regions. Code is available at https://github.com/adspit/PASCAL.
Adriana Pitea, Ivan Kondofersky, Steffen Sass, Fabian J. Theis, Nikola S. Müller, Kristian Unger
Briefings Bioinform.2