Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mitchell van Zuijlen

dblp:263/2139 · also Mitchell J. P. van Zuijlen · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0002-5739-6507ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visual content generation and editing · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
data augmentation for robustness
0.512021
What Can Style Transfer and Paintings Do for Model Robustness? · CVPR 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.512021
What Can Style Transfer and Paintings Do for Model Robustness? · CVPR 2021
Visual content generation and editing
style transfer
0.512021
What Can Style Transfer and Paintings Do for Model Robustness? · CVPR 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

style transfer · 1.0data augmentation · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 What Can Style Transfer and Paintings Do for Model Robustness?
abstract
A common strategy for improving model robustness is through data augmentations. Data augmentations encourage models to learn desired invariances, such as invariance to horizontal flipping or small changes in color. Recent work has shown that arbitrary style transfer can be used as a form of data augmentation to encourage invariance to textures by creating painting-like images from photographs. However, a stylized photograph is not quite the same as an artist-created painting. Artists depict perceptually meaningful cues in paintings so that humans can recognize salient components in scenes, an emphasis which is not enforced in style transfer. Therefore, we study how style transfer and paintings differ in their impact on model robustness. First, we investigate the role of paintings as style images for stylization-based data augmentation. We find that style transfer functions well even without paintings as style images. Second, we show that learning from paintings as a form of perceptual data augmentation can improve model robustness. Finally, we investigate the invariances learned from stylization and from paintings, and show that models learn different invariances from these differing forms of data. Our results provide insights into how stylization improves model robustness, and provide evidence that artist-created paintings can be a valuable source of data for model robustness. Code and data are available at: https://github.com/hubertsgithub/style_painting_robustness
Hubert Lin, Mitchell van Zuijlen, Sylvia C. Pont, Maarten Wijntjes, Kavita Bala
CVPR2