Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michael Twiton

dblp:263/2689 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 56% Generative modeling · 28% Language models and text generation · 16%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
bias mitigation
1.022022
Linear Adversarial Concept Erasure · ICML 2022
Null It Out: Guarding Protected Attributes by Iterative Nullspace Projection · ACL 2020
Machine learning › Generative modeling
concept erasure
1.022022
Linear Adversarial Concept Erasure · ICML 2022
Null It Out: Guarding Protected Attributes by Iterative Nullspace Projection · ACL 2020
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
1.022022
Linear Adversarial Concept Erasure · ICML 2022
Null It Out: Guarding Protected Attributes by Iterative Nullspace Projection · ACL 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › knowledge editing
representation editing
0.612022
Linear Adversarial Concept Erasure · ICML 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

linear minimax game · 0.6convex relaxation · 0.6linear classifier · 0.4iterative nullspace projection · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Linear Adversarial Concept Erasure
abstract
Modern neural models trained on textual data rely on pre-trained representations that emerge without direct supervision. As these representations are increasingly being used in real-world applications, the inability to control their content becomes an increasingly important problem. In this work, we formulate the problem of identifying a linear subspace that corresponds to a given concept, and removing it from the representation. We formulate this problem as a constrained, linear minimax game, and show that existing solutions are generally not optimal for this task. We derive a closed-form solution for certain objectives, and propose a convex relaxation that works well for others. When evaluated in the context of binary gender removal, the method recovers a low-dimensional subspace whose removal mitigates bias by intrinsic and extrinsic evaluation. Surprisingly, we show that the method—despite being linear—is highly expressive, effectively mitigating bias in the output layers of deep, nonlinear classifiers while maintaining tractability and interpretability.
Shauli Ravfogel, Michael Twiton, Yoav Goldberg, Ryan Cotterell
ICML2
2020 Null It Out: Guarding Protected Attributes by Iterative Nullspace Projection
abstract
The ability to control for the kinds of information encoded in neural representation has a variety of use cases, especially in light of the challenge of interpreting these models.We present Iterative Null-space Projection (INLP), a novel method for removing information from neural representations.Our method is based on repeated training of linear classifiers that predict a certain property we aim to remove, followed by projection of the representations on their null-space.By doing so, the classifiers become oblivious to that target property, making it hard to linearly separate the data according to it.While applicable for multiple uses, we evaluate our method on bias and fairness use-cases, and show that our method is able to mitigate bias in word embeddings, as well as to increase fairness in a setting of multi-class classification.
Shauli Ravfogel, Yanai Elazar, Hila Gonen, Michael Twiton, Yoav Goldberg
ACL4