Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kristina Tesch
dblp:263/4948
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
7as first author
5since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-6458-8128ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 5 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 4 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
3 papers |
Audio and music processing · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Audio and music processing › speech enhancement
multichannel speech enhancement |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Insights Into Deep Non-Linear Filters for Improved Multi-Channel Speech Enhancement · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2023 Nonlinear Spatial Filtering in Multichannel Speech Enhancement · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2021 |
Audio and music processing
speech enhancement |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Insights Into Deep Non-Linear Filters for Improved Multi-Channel Speech Enhancement · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2023 Nonlinear Spatial Filtering in Multichannel Speech Enhancement · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2021 |
Audio and music processing › source separation › speech separation
multichannel speech separation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Multi-Channel Speech Separation Using Spatially Selective Deep Non-Linear Filters · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2024 |
Audio and music processing › source separation
speech separation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Multi-Channel Speech Separation Using Spatially Selective Deep Non-Linear Filters · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2024 |
Audio and music processing › source separation › speech separation
target speech extraction |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Insights Into Deep Non-Linear Filters for Improved Multi-Channel Speech Enhancement · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2023 |
Audio and music processing
beamforming |
0.3 | 2 | 2023 | Insights Into Deep Non-Linear Filters for Improved Multi-Channel Speech Enhancement · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2023 Nonlinear Spatial Filtering in Multichannel Speech Enhancement · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2021 |
Audio and music processing › source separation › speech separation
permutation invariant training |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Multi-Channel Speech Separation Using Spatially Selective Deep Non-Linear Filters · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
deep neural network · 1.4recurrent neural network · 0.8permutation invariant training · 0.8neural network · 0.5minimum mean square error estimation · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Multi-Channel Speech Separation Using Spatially Selective Deep Non-Linear FiltersabstractIn a multi-channel separation task with multiple speakers, we aim to recover all individual speech signals from the mixture. In contrast to single-channel approaches, which rely on the different spectro-temporal characteristics of the speech signals, multi-channel approaches should additionally utilize the different spatial locations of the sources for a more powerful separation especially when the number of sources increases. To enhance the spatial processing in a multi-channel source separation scenario, in this work, we propose a deep neural network (DNN) based spatially selective filter (SSF) that can be spatially steered to extract the speaker of interest by initializing a recurrent neural network layer with the target direction. We compare the proposed SSF with a common end-to-end direct separation (DS) approach trained using utterance-wise permutation invariant training (PIT), which only implicitly learns to perform spatial filtering. We show that the SSF has a clear advantage over a DS approach with the same underlying network architecture when there are more than two speakers in the mixture, which can be attributed to a better use of the spatial information. Furthermore, we find that the SSF generalizes much better to additional noise sources that were not seen during training and to scenarios with speakers positioned at a similar angle. Kristina Tesch, Timo Gerkmann |
IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. | 1 |
| 2023 | Spatially Selective Deep Non-Linear Filters For Speaker ExtractionabstractIn a scenario with multiple persons talking simultaneously, the spatial characteristics of the signals are the most distinct feature for extracting the target signal. In this work, we develop a deep joint spatial-spectral non-linear filter that can be steered to an arbitrary target direction. For this we propose a simple and effective conditioning mechanism, which sets the initial state of the filter’s recurrent layers based on the target direction. We show that this scheme is more effective than the baseline approach and increases the flexibility of the filter at no performance cost. The resulting spatially selective non-linear filters can also be used for speech separation of an arbitrary number of speakers and enable very accurate multi-speaker localization as we demonstrate in this paper. Kristina Tesch, Timo Gerkmann |
ICASSP | 1 |
| 2023 | Insights Into Deep Non-Linear Filters for Improved Multi-Channel Speech EnhancementabstractThe key advantage of using multiple microphones for speech enhancement is that spatial filtering can be used to complement the tempo-spectral processing. In a traditional setting, linear spatial filtering (beamforming) and single-channel post-filtering are commonly performed separately. In contrast, there is a trend towards employing (DNNs) to learn a joint spatial and tempo-spectral non-linear filter, which means that the restriction of a linear processing model and that of a separate processing of spatial and tempo-spectral information can potentially be overcome. However, the internal mechanisms that lead to good performance of such data-driven filters for multi-channel speech enhancement are not well understood. Therefore, in this work, we analyse the properties of a non-linear spatial filter realized by a DNN as well as its interdependency with temporal and spectral processing by carefully controlling the information sources (spatial, spectral, and temporal) available to the network. We confirm the superiority of a non-linear spatial processing model, which outperforms an oracle linear spatial filter in a challenging speaker extraction scenario for a low number of microphones by 0.24 POLQA score. Our analyses reveal that in particular spectral information should be processed jointly with spatial information as this increases the spatial selectivity of the filter. Our systematic evaluation then leads to a simple network architecture, that outperforms state-of-the-art network architectures on a speaker extraction task by 0.22 POLQA score and by 0.32 POLQA score on the CHiME3 data. Kristina Tesch, Timo Gerkmann |
IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. | 1 |
| 2022 | On the Role of Spatial, Spectral, and Temporal Processing for DNN-based Non-linear Multi-channel Speech Enhancement
Kristina Tesch, Nils-Hendrik Mohrmann, Timo Gerkmann |
INTERSPEECH | 1 |
| 2021 | Nonlinear Spatial Filtering in Multichannel Speech EnhancementabstractThe majority of multichannel speech enhancement algorithms are two-step procedures that first apply a linear spatial filter, a so-called beamformer, and combine it with a single-channel approach for postprocessing. However, the serial concatenation of a linear spatial filter and a postfilter is not generally optimal in the minimum mean square error (MMSE) sense for noise distributions other than a Gaussian distribution. Rather, the MMSE optimal filter is ajoint spatial and spectral nonlinearfunction. While estimating the parameters of such a filter with traditional methods is challenging, modern neural networks may provide an efficient way to learn the nonlinear function directly from data. To see if further research in this direction is worthwhile, in this work we examine the potential performance benefit of replacing the common two-step procedure with a joint spatial and spectral nonlinear filter. We analyze three different forms of non-Gaussianity: First, we evaluate on super-Gaussian noise with a high kurtosis. Second, we evaluate on inhomogeneous noise fields created by five interfering sources using two microphones, and third, we evaluate on real-world recordings from the CHiME3 database. In all scenarios, considerable improvements may be obtained. Most prominently, our analyses show that a nonlinear spatial filter uses the available spatial information more effectively than a linear spatial filter as it is capable of suppressing more than$D-1$directional interfering sources with a$D$-dimensional microphone array without spatial adaptation. Kristina Tesch, Timo Gerkmann |
IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. | 1 |
| 2020 | Nonlinear Spatial Filtering for Multichannel Speech Enhancement in Inhomogeneous Noise FieldsabstractA common processing pipeline for multichannel speech enhancement is to combine a linear spatial filter with a single-channel postfilter. In fact, it can be shown that such a combination is optimal in the minimum mean square error (MMSE) sense if the noise follows a multivariate Gaussian distribution. However, for non-Gaussian noise, this serial concatenation is generally suboptimal and may thus also lead to suboptimal results. For instance, in our previous work, we showed that a joint spatial-spectral nonlinear estimator achieves a performance gain of 2.6 dB segmental signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) improvement for heavy-tailed large-kurtosis multivariate noise compared to the traditional combination of a linear spatial beamformer and a postfilter.In this paper, we show that a joint spatial-spectral nonlinear filter is not only advantageous for noise distributions that are significantly more heavy-tailed than a Gaussian but also for distributions that model inhomogeneous noise fields while having rather low kurtosis. In experiments with artificially created noise we measure a gain of 1 dB for inhomogenous noise with low kurtosis and up to 2 dB for inhomogeneous noise fields with moderate kurtosis. Kristina Tesch, Timo Gerkmann |
ICASSP | 1 |
| 2019 | On Nonlinear Spatial Filtering in Multichannel Speech EnhancementabstractThe majority of multichannel speech enhancement algorithms are two-step procedures that first apply a linear spatial filter, a so-called beamformer, and combine it with a single-channel approach for postprocessing.However, the serial concatenation of a linear spatial filter and a postfilter is not generally optimal in the minimum mean square error (MMSE) sense for noise distributions other than a Gaussian distribution.Rather, the MMSE optimal filter is a joint spatial and spectral nonlinear function.While estimating the parameters of such a filter with traditional methods is challenging, modern neural networks may provide an efficient way to learn the nonlinear function directly from data.To see if further research in this direction is worthwhile, in this work we examine the potential performance benefit of replacing the common two-step procedure with a joint spatial and spectral nonlinear filter.We analyze three different forms of non-Gaussianity: First, we evaluate on super-Gaussian noise with a high kurtosis.Second, we evaluate on inhomogeneous noise fields created by five interfering sources using two microphones, and third, we evaluate on realworld recordings from the CHiME3 database.In all scenarios, considerable improvements may be obtained.Most prominently, our analyses show that a nonlinear spatial filter uses the available spatial information more effectively than a linear spatial filter as it is capable of suppressing more than D -1 directional interfering sources with a D-dimensional microphone array without spatial adaptation. Kristina Tesch, Robert Rehr, Timo Gerkmann |
INTERSPEECH | 1 |