Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sven Wang

dblp:263/9141 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0003-0503-4314ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 71% Mathematical optimization · 14% Approximation and online algorithms · 14%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Learning theory · 57% Deep learning architectures and training · 19% Generative modeling · 19%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
social choice
1.422024
Manipulation-Robust Selection of Citizens' Assemblies · AAAI 2024
Distortion Under Public-Spirited Voting · EC 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.812024
Infinite-Dimensional Diffusion Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory
distribution learning
0.812024
Distribution Learning via Neural Differential Equations: A Nonparametric Statistical Perspective · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation › minimax estimation
minimax rates
0.812024
Distribution Learning via Neural Differential Equations: A Nonparametric Statistical Perspective · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural differential equations
neural ordinary differential equations
0.812024
Distribution Learning via Neural Differential Equations: A Nonparametric Statistical Perspective · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization
0.812024
Manipulation-Robust Selection of Citizens' Assemblies · AAAI 2024
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
fair division
0.812024
Manipulation-Robust Selection of Citizens' Assemblies · AAAI 2024
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › fair division › max-min fairness
leximin fairness
0.812024
Manipulation-Robust Selection of Citizens' Assemblies · AAAI 2024
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation algorithms
l_p norm objective
0.812024
Manipulation-Robust Selection of Citizens' Assemblies · AAAI 2024
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › social choice
distortion of voting rules
0.712023
Distortion Under Public-Spirited Voting · EC 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › posterior inference
bayesian inverse problems
0.212024
Infinite-Dimensional Diffusion Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
welfare maximization
0.212023
Distortion Under Public-Spirited Voting · EC 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

ordinary differential equation · 0.8metric entropy · 0.8manifold data · 0.8lp norm · 0.8likelihood maximization · 0.8leximin · 0.8dimension-independent bounds · 0.8approximation bounds · 0.8worst-case distortion analysis · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Manipulation-Robust Selection of Citizens' Assemblies
abstract
Among the recent work on designing algorithms for selecting citizens' assembly participants, one key property of these algorithms has not yet been studied: their manipulability. Strategic manipulation is a concern because these algorithms must satisfy representation constraints according to volunteers' self-reported features; misreporting these features could thereby increase a volunteer's chance of being selected, decrease someone else's chance, and/or increase the expected number of seats given to their group. Strikingly, we show that Leximin — an algorithm that is widely used for its fairness — is highly manipulable in this way. We then introduce a new class of selection algorithms that use Lp norms as objective functions. We show that the manipulability of the Lp-based algorithm decreases in O(1/n^(1-1/p)) as the number of volunteers n grows, approaching the optimal rate of O(1/n) as p approaches infinity. These theoretical results are confirmed via experiments in eight real-world datasets.
Bailey Flanigan, Jennifer Liang, Ariel D. Procaccia, Sven Wang
AAAI4
2024 Distribution Learning via Neural Differential Equations: A Nonparametric Statistical Perspective
abstract
Ordinary differential equations (ODEs), via their induced flow maps, provide a powerful framework to parameterize invertible transformations for representing complex probability distributions. While such models have achieved enormous success in machine learning, little is known about their statistical properties. This work establishes the first general nonparametric statistical convergence analysis for distribution learning via ODE models trained through likelihood maximization. We first prove a convergence theorem applicable to arbitrary velocity field classes $\mathcal{F}$ satisfying certain simple boundary constraints. This general result captures the trade-off between the approximation error and complexity of the ODE model. We show that the latter can be quantified via the $C^1$-metric entropy of the class $\mathcal{F}$. We then apply this general framework to the setting of $C^k$-smooth target densities, and establish nearly minimax-optimal convergence rates for two relevant velocity field classes $\mathcal{F}$: $C^k$ functions and neural networks. The latter is the practically important case of neural ODEs. Our results also provide insight on how the choice of velocity field class, and the dependence of this choice on sample size (e.g., the scaling of neural network classes), impact statistical performance.
Youssef Marzouk 0001, Zhi Ren 0003, Sven Wang, Jakob Zech
J. Mach. Learn. Res.3
2024 Infinite-Dimensional Diffusion Models
abstract
Diffusion models have had a profound impact on many application areas, including those where data are intrinsically infinite-dimensional, such as images or time series. The standard approach is first to discretize and then to apply diffusion models to the discretized data. While such approaches are practically appealing, the performance of the resulting algorithms typically deteriorates as discretization parameters are refined. In this paper, we instead directly formulate diffusion-based generative models in infinite dimensions and apply them to the generative modelling of functions. We prove that our formulations are well posed in the infinite-dimensional setting and provide dimension-independent distance bounds from the sample to the target measure. Using our theory, we also develop guidelines for the design of infinite-dimensional diffusion models. For image distributions, these guidelines are in line with current canonical choices. For other distributions, however, we can improve upon these canonical choices. We demonstrate these results both theoretically and empirically, by applying the algorithms to data distributions on manifolds and to distributions arising in Bayesian inverse problems or simulation-based inference.
Jakiw Pidstrigach, Youssef Marzouk 0001, Sebastian Reich, Sven Wang
J. Mach. Learn. Res.4
2023 Distortion Under Public-Spirited Voting
abstract
A key promise of voting is that, by accounting for all constituents' preferences, it produces decisions that benefit society overall. It is alarming, then, that all deterministic voting rules have unbounded distortion (i.e., arbitrarily suboptimal social welfare). Existing work usually circumvents this stark impossibility by assuming restrictions on voters' possible latent utilities [Anshelevich et al. 2021]; however, it is not clear whether such assumptions reliably hold in practice, because voters' utilities are, to a large degree, inherent.
Bailey Flanigan, Ariel D. Procaccia, Sven Wang
EC3