Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chitturi Sidhartha
dblp:264/3658
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0007-7139-3357ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
3D vision · 50% Efficient and distributed learning · 35% Optimization for machine learning · 15% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Geometric modeling and processing · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning › model aggregation
robust aggregation |
1.8 | 2 | 2026 | Robust Averaging using Adaptive Annealing · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2026 Adaptive Annealing for Robust Averaging · ECCV (70) 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
robust estimation |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | SAC-GNC: Sample Consensus for Adaptive Graduated Non-Convexity · ICCV 2025 Adaptive Annealing for Robust Averaging · ECCV (70) 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › robust estimation
RANSAC |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SAC-GNC: Sample Consensus for Adaptive Graduated Non-Convexity · ICCV 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › nonconvex optimization
graduated non-convexity |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SAC-GNC: Sample Consensus for Adaptive Graduated Non-Convexity · ICCV 2025 |
Mathematical optimization
nonconvex optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SAC-GNC: Sample Consensus for Adaptive Graduated Non-Convexity · ICCV 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › stochastic search
annealing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Adaptive Annealing for Robust Averaging · ECCV (70) 2024 |
Geometric modeling and processing › registration
3d registration |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Adaptive Annealing for Robust Geometric Estimation · CVPR 2023 |
Geometric modeling and processing
registration |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Adaptive Annealing for Robust Geometric Estimation · CVPR 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
adaptive annealing · 2.4sample consensus · 1.7robust averaging · 0.8hessian convexity tracking · 0.7graduated nonconvexity · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Robust Averaging using Adaptive Annealing
Chitturi Sidhartha, Venu Madhav Govindu |
Int. J. Comput. Vis. | 1 |
| 2025 | SAC-GNC: Sample Consensus for Adaptive Graduated Non-Convexity
Valter Piedade, Chitturi Sidhartha, Joseé Gaspar, Venu Madhav Govindu, Pedro Miraldo |
ICCV | 2 |
| 2024 | Adaptive Annealing for Robust Averaging
Chitturi Sidhartha, Venu Madhav Govindu |
ECCV (70) | 1 |
| 2023 | Adaptive Annealing for Robust Geometric EstimationabstractGeometric estimation problems in vision are often solved via minimization of statistical loss functions which account for the presence of outliers in the observations. The corresponding energy landscape often has many local minima. Many approaches attempt to avoid local minima by an-nealing the scale parameter of loss functions using methods such as graduated non-convexity (GNC). However, little attention has been paid to the annealing schedule, which is often carried out in a fixed manner, resulting in a poor speed-accuracy trade-off and unreliable convergence to the global minimum. In this paper, we propose a principled approach for adaptively annealing the scale for GNC by tracking the positive-definiteness (i.e. local convexity) of the Hessian of the cost function. We illustrate our approach using the classic problem of registering 3D correspondences in the presence of noise and outliers. We also develop approximations to the Hessian that significantly speeds up our method. The effectiveness of our approach is validated by comparing its performance with state-of-the-art 3D registration approaches on a number of synthetic and real datasets. Our approach is accurate and efficient and converges to the global solution more reliably than the state-of-the-art methods. Chitturi Sidhartha, Lalit Manam, Venu Madhav Govindu |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2021 | It Is All In The Weights: Robust Rotation Averaging RevisitedabstractRotation averaging is the problem of recovering 3D camera rotations from a number of pairwise relative rotation estimates. The state-of-the-art method of [51 involves robust averaging in the Lie-algebra of 3D rotations using an $\ell_{\frac{1}{2}}$ loss function which is carried out using an iteratively reweighted least squares (IRLS) minimization. In this paper we argue that the performance of IRLS-based rotation averaging is intimately connected with two factors: a) the nature of the robust loss function used, and b) the initialization. We make two contributions. Firstly, we analyse the pitfalls associated with the unbounded weights in IRLS minimization of $\ell_{p}(0\lt p\lt 2)$ loss functions in the context of rotation averaging. We elucidate the design choices and modifications implicit to the state-of-the-art method of [5] that overcomes these problems. Secondly, we argue that the $\ell_{\frac{1}{2}}$ -based IRLS method is inflexible in adapting to the specific noise characteristics of individual datasets, leading to poorer performance. We remedy this limitation by means of a Geman-McClure loss function embedded in a graduated optimization framework. We present results on a number of large-scale real-world datasets to demonstrate that our proposed method outpetforms state-of-the-art methods in terms of both efficiency and accuracy. Chitturi Sidhartha, Venu Madhav Govindu |
3DV | 1 |