Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chung-En Sun

dblp:264/5788 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
5as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 4 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 77% Language models and text generation · 15% Reinforcement learning · 6%

Topics — the 15 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
2.632025
Concept Bottleneck Large Language Models · ICLR 2025
ThinkEdit: Interpretable Weight Editing to Mitigate Overly Short Thinking in Reasoning Models · EMNLP 2025
Interpretable Generative Models through Post-hoc Concept Bottlenecks · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
concept bottleneck model
1.722025
Concept Bottleneck Large Language Models · ICLR 2025
Interpretable Generative Models through Post-hoc Concept Bottlenecks · CVPR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
chain-of-thought reasoning
0.912025
ThinkEdit: Interpretable Weight Editing to Mitigate Overly Short Thinking in Reasoning Models · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › neural network interpretation
interpretability of generative models
0.912025
Interpretable Generative Models through Post-hoc Concept Bottlenecks · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
language model interpretability
0.912025
Concept Bottleneck Large Language Models · ICLR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model reasoning
0.912025
ThinkEdit: Interpretable Weight Editing to Mitigate Overly Short Thinking in Reasoning Models · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
mechanistic interpretability
0.912025
ThinkEdit: Interpretable Weight Editing to Mitigate Overly Short Thinking in Reasoning Models · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › concept bottleneck model
post-hoc concept bottleneck model
0.912025
Interpretable Generative Models through Post-hoc Concept Bottlenecks · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness
0.812024
Breaking the Barrier: Enhanced Utility and Robustness in Smoothed DRL Agents · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
deep reinforcement learning
0.812024
Breaking the Barrier: Enhanced Utility and Robustness in Smoothed DRL Agents · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › certified robustness
randomized smoothing
0.812024
Breaking the Barrier: Enhanced Utility and Robustness in Smoothed DRL Agents · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.812024
Breaking the Barrier: Enhanced Utility and Robustness in Smoothed DRL Agents · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network
0.312025
Interpretable Generative Models through Post-hoc Concept Bottlenecks · CVPR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation
0.312025
Concept Bottleneck Large Language Models · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial attack
0.212024
Breaking the Barrier: Enhanced Utility and Robustness in Smoothed DRL Agents · ICML 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

weight editing · 0.9post-hoc training · 0.9concept-bottleneck autoencoder · 0.9concept detection · 0.9concept controller · 0.9concept bottleneck model · 0.9activation steering · 0.9randomized smoothing · 0.8adversarial training · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Interpretable Generative Models through Post-hoc Concept Bottlenecks
abstract
Concept bottleneck models (CBM) aim to produce inherently interpretable models that rely on human-understandable concepts for their predictions. However, existing approaches to design interpretable generative models based on CBMs are not yet efficient and scalable, as they require expensive generative model training from scratch as well as real images with labor-intensive concept supervision. To address these challenges, we present two novel and low-cost methods to build interpretable generative models through post-hoc techniques and we name our approaches: concept-bottleneck autoencoder (CB-AE) and concept controller (CC). Our proposed approaches enable efficient and scalable training without the need of real data and require only minimal to no concept supervision. Additionally, our methods generalize across modern generative model families including generative adversarial networks and diffusion models. We demonstrate the superior interpretability and steerability of our methods on numerous standard datasets like CelebA, CelebA-HQ, and CUB with large improvements (average ∼25%) over the prior work, while being 4-15× faster to train. Finally, a large-scale user study is performed to validate the inter-pretability and steerability of our methods1.
Akshay R. Kulkarni, Chung-En Sun, Tuomas P. Oikarinen, Tsui-Wei Weng
CVPR3
2025 ThinkEdit: Interpretable Weight Editing to Mitigate Overly Short Thinking in Reasoning Models
abstract
Recent studies have shown that Large Language Models (LLMs) augmented with chainof-thought (CoT) reasoning demonstrate impressive problem-solving abilities.However, in this work, we identify a recurring issue where these models occasionally generate overly short reasoning, leading to degraded performance on even simple mathematical problems.Specifically, we investigate how reasoning length is embedded in the hidden representations of reasoning models and its impact on accuracy.Our analysis reveals that reasoning length is governed by a linear direction in the representation space, allowing us to induce overly short reasoning by steering the model along this direction.Building on this insight, we introduce ThinkEdit, a simple yet effective weight-editing approach to mitigate the issue of overly short reasoning.We first identify a small subset of attention heads (approximately 4%) that predominantly drive short reasoning behavior.We then edit the output projection weights of these heads to remove the short reasoning direction.With changes to only 0.2% of the model's parameters, ThinkEdit effectively reduces overly short reasoning and yields notable accuracy gains for short reasoning outputs (+6.39%), along with an overall improvement across multiple math benchmarks (+3.34%).Our findings provide new mechanistic insights into how reasoning length is controlled within LLMs and highlight the potential of fine-grained model interventions to improve reasoning quality.Our code is available
Chung-En Sun, Tsui-Wei Weng
EMNLP1
2025 Concept Bottleneck Large Language Models
abstract
We introduce Concept Bottleneck Large Language Models (CB-LLMs), a novel framework for building inherently interpretable Large Language Models (LLMs). In contrast to traditional black-box LLMs that rely on limited post-hoc interpretations, CB-LLMs integrate intrinsic interpretability directly into the LLMs -- allowing accurate explanations with scalability and transparency. We build CB-LLMs for two essential NLP tasks: text classification and text generation. In text classification, CB-LLMs is competitive with, and at times outperforms, traditional black-box models while providing explicit and interpretable reasoning. For the more challenging task of text generation, interpretable neurons in CB-LLMs enable precise concept detection, controlled generation, and safer outputs. The embedded interpretability empowers users to transparently identify harmful content, steer model behavior, and unlearn undesired concepts -- significantly enhancing the safety, reliability, and trustworthiness of LLMs, which are critical capabilities notably absent in existing language models.
Chung-En Sun, Tuomas P. Oikarinen, Berk Ustun, Tsui-Wei Weng
ICLR1
2025 Effective Skill Unlearning through Intervention and Abstention
abstract
Yongce Li, Chung-En Sun, Tsui-Wei Weng. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025.
Yongce Li, Chung-En Sun, Tsui-Wei Weng
NAACL (Long Papers)2
2025 Iterative Self-Tuning LLMs for Enhanced Jailbreaking Capabilities
abstract
Chung-En Sun, Xiaodong Liu, Weiwei Yang, Tsui-Wei Weng, Hao Cheng, Aidan San, Michel Galley, Jianfeng Gao. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025.
Chung-En Sun, Xiaodong Liu 0003, Tsui-Wei Weng, Hao Cheng 0002, Aidan San, Michel Galley, Jianfeng Gao 0001
NAACL (Long Papers)1
2024 Breaking the Barrier: Enhanced Utility and Robustness in Smoothed DRL Agents
abstract
Robustness remains a paramount concern in deep reinforcement learning (DRL), with randomized smoothing emerging as a key technique for enhancing this attribute. However, a notable gap exists in the performance of current smoothed DRL agents, often characterized by significantly low clean rewards and weak robustness. In response to this challenge, our study introduces innovative algorithms aimed at training effective smoothed robust DRL agents. We propose S-DQN and S-PPO, novel approaches that demonstrate remarkable improvements in clean rewards, empirical robustness, and robustness guarantee across standard RL benchmarks. Notably, our S-DQN and S-PPO agents not only significantly outperform existing smoothed agents by an average factor of $2.16\times$ under the strongest attack, but also surpass previous robustly-trained agents by an average factor of $2.13\times$. This represents a significant leap forward in the field. Furthermore, we introduce Smoothed Attack, which is $1.89\times$ more effective in decreasing the rewards of smoothed agents than existing adversarial attacks. Our code is available at: https://github.com/Trustworthy-ML-Lab/Robust_HighUtil_Smoothed_DRL
Chung-En Sun, Sicun Gao, Tsui-Wei Weng
ICML1
2021 Melody Harmonization Using Orderless Nade, Chord Balancing, and Blocked Gibbs Sampling
abstract
Coherence and interestingness are two criteria for evaluating the performance of melody harmonization, which aims to generate a chord progression from a symbolic melody. In this study, we apply the concept of orderless NADE, which takes the melody and its partially masked chord sequence as the input of the BiLSTM-based networks to learn the masked ground truth, to the training process. In addition, the class weights are used to compensate for some reasonable chord labels that are rarely seen in the training set. Consistent with the stochasticity in training, blocked Gibbs sampling with proper numbers of masking/generating loops is used in the inference phase to progressively trade the coherence of the generated chord sequence off against its interestingness. The experiments were conducted on a dataset of 18,005 melody/chord pairs. Our proposed model outperforms the state-of-the-art system MTHarmonizer in five of six different objective metrics based on chord/melody harmonicity and chord progression. The subjective test results with more than 100 participants also show the superiority of our model.
Chung-En Sun, Yi-Wei Chen, Hung-Shin Lee, Yen-Hsing Chen, Hsin-Min Wang
ICASSP1