VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mike Laszkiewicz
dblp:264/5914
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Generative modeling · 52% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 30% Time series and sequential data · 18% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Security and privacy of machine learning › model intellectual property protection
model provenance |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Single-Model Attribution of Generative Models Through Final-Layer Inversion · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
density estimation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Marginal Tail-Adaptive Normalizing Flows · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
normalizing flow |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Marginal Tail-Adaptive Normalizing Flows · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › normalizing flow
tail-adaptive flows |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Marginal Tail-Adaptive Normalizing Flows · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
anomaly detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Single-Model Attribution of Generative Models Through Final-Layer Inversion · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › anomaly detection
generative anomaly detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Single-Model Attribution of Generative Models Through Final-Layer Inversion · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › normalizing flow
autoregressive flow |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Marginal Tail-Adaptive Normalizing Flows · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Marginal Tail-Adaptive Normalizing Flows · ICML 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
final-layer inversion · 1.5anomaly detection · 1.5lasso optimization · 0.8LASSO optimization · 0.8normalizing flow · 0.6convex optimization · 0.6autoregressive modeling · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | AnomalyDINO: Boosting Patch-based Few-Shot Anomaly Detection with DINOv2abstractRecent advances in multimodal foundation models have set new standards in few-shot anomaly detection. This paper explores whether high-quality visual features alone are sufficient to rival existing state-of-the-art vision-language models. We affirm this by adapting DINOv2 for oneshot and few-shot anomaly detection, with a focus on industrial applications. We show that this approach does not only rival existing techniques but can even outmatch them in many settings. Our proposed vision-only approach, AnomalyDINO, follows the well-established patchlevel deep nearest neighbor paradigm, and enables both image-level anomaly prediction and pixel-level anomaly segmentation. The approach is methodologically simple and training-free and, thus, does not require any additional data for fine-tuning or meta-learning. Despite its simplicity, AnomalyDINO achieves state-of-the-art results in oneand few-shot anomaly detection (e.g., pushing the one-shot performance on MVTec-AD from an AUROC of 93.1% to 96.6%). The reduced overhead, coupled with its outstanding few-shot performance, makes AnomalyDINO a strong candidate for fast deployment, e.g., in industrial contexts. Simon Damm, Mike Laszkiewicz, Johannes Lederer, Asja Fischer |
WACV | 2 |
| 2024 | Single-Model Attribution of Generative Models Through Final-Layer InversionabstractRecent breakthroughs in generative modeling have sparked interest in practical single-model attribution. Such methods predict whether a sample was generated by a specific generator or not, for instance, to prove intellectual property theft. However, previous works are either limited to the closed-world setting or require undesirable changes to the generative model. We address these shortcomings by, first, viewing single-model attribution through the lens of anomaly detection. Arising from this change of perspective, we propose FLIPAD, a new approach for single-model attribution in the open-world setting based on final-layer inversion and anomaly detection. We show that the utilized final-layer inversion can be reduced to a convex lasso optimization problem, making our approach theoretically sound and computationally efficient. The theoretical findings are accompanied by an experimental study demonstrating the effectiveness of our approach and its flexibility to various domains. Mike Laszkiewicz, Jonas Ricker, Johannes Lederer, Asja Fischer |
ICML | 1 |
| 2022 | Marginal Tail-Adaptive Normalizing FlowsabstractLearning the tail behavior of a distribution is a notoriously difficult problem. By definition, the number of samples from the tail is small, and deep generative models, such as normalizing flows, tend to concentrate on learning the body of the distribution. In this paper, we focus on improving the ability of normalizing flows to correctly capture the tail behavior and, thus, form more accurate models. We prove that the marginal tailedness of an autoregressive flow can be controlled via the tailedness of the marginals of its base distribution. This theoretical insight leads us to a novel type of flows based on flexible base distributions and data-driven linear layers. An empirical analysis shows that the proposed method improves on the accuracy{—}especially on the tails of the distribution{—}and is able to generate heavy-tailed data. We demonstrate its application on a weather and climate example, in which capturing the tail behavior is essential. Mike Laszkiewicz, Johannes Lederer, Asja Fischer |
ICML | 1 |
| 2021 | Thresholded Adaptive Validation: Tuning the Graphical Lasso for Graph RecoveryabstractMany Machine Learning algorithms are formulated as regularized optimization problems, but their performance hinges on a regularization parameter that needs to be calibrated to each application at hand. In this paper, we propose a general calibration scheme for regularized optimization problems and apply it to the graphical lasso, which is a method for Gaussian graphical modeling. The scheme is equipped with theoretical guarantees and motivates a thresholding pipeline that can improve graph recovery. Moreover, requiring at most one line search over the regularization path, the calibration scheme is computationally more efficient than competing schemes that are based on resampling. Finally, we show in simulations that our approach can improve on the graph recovery of other approaches considerably. Mike Laszkiewicz, Asja Fischer, Johannes Lederer |
AISTATS | 1 |