Mike Laszkiewicz

dblp:264/5914 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Generative modeling · 52% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 30% Time series and sequential data · 18%
Network and information security
1 paper
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Security and privacy of machine learning › model intellectual property protection
model provenance
0.812024
Single-Model Attribution of Generative Models Through Final-Layer Inversion · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
density estimation
0.612022
Marginal Tail-Adaptive Normalizing Flows · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Generative modeling
normalizing flow
0.612022
Marginal Tail-Adaptive Normalizing Flows · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Generative modeling › normalizing flow
tail-adaptive flows
0.612022
Marginal Tail-Adaptive Normalizing Flows · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
anomaly detection
0.212024
Single-Model Attribution of Generative Models Through Final-Layer Inversion · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › anomaly detection
generative anomaly detection
0.212024
Single-Model Attribution of Generative Models Through Final-Layer Inversion · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling › normalizing flow
autoregressive flow
0.212022
Marginal Tail-Adaptive Normalizing Flows · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model
0.212022
Marginal Tail-Adaptive Normalizing Flows · ICML 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

final-layer inversion · 1.5anomaly detection · 1.5lasso optimization · 0.8LASSO optimization · 0.8normalizing flow · 0.6convex optimization · 0.6autoregressive modeling · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 AnomalyDINO: Boosting Patch-based Few-Shot Anomaly Detection with DINOv2
abstract
Recent advances in multimodal foundation models have set new standards in few-shot anomaly detection. This paper explores whether high-quality visual features alone are sufficient to rival existing state-of-the-art vision-language models. We affirm this by adapting DINOv2 for oneshot and few-shot anomaly detection, with a focus on industrial applications. We show that this approach does not only rival existing techniques but can even outmatch them in many settings. Our proposed vision-only approach, AnomalyDINO, follows the well-established patchlevel deep nearest neighbor paradigm, and enables both image-level anomaly prediction and pixel-level anomaly segmentation. The approach is methodologically simple and training-free and, thus, does not require any additional data for fine-tuning or meta-learning. Despite its simplicity, AnomalyDINO achieves state-of-the-art results in oneand few-shot anomaly detection (e.g., pushing the one-shot performance on MVTec-AD from an AUROC of 93.1% to 96.6%). The reduced overhead, coupled with its outstanding few-shot performance, makes AnomalyDINO a strong candidate for fast deployment, e.g., in industrial contexts.
Simon Damm, Mike Laszkiewicz, Johannes Lederer, Asja Fischer
WACV2
2024 Single-Model Attribution of Generative Models Through Final-Layer Inversion
abstract
Recent breakthroughs in generative modeling have sparked interest in practical single-model attribution. Such methods predict whether a sample was generated by a specific generator or not, for instance, to prove intellectual property theft. However, previous works are either limited to the closed-world setting or require undesirable changes to the generative model. We address these shortcomings by, first, viewing single-model attribution through the lens of anomaly detection. Arising from this change of perspective, we propose FLIPAD, a new approach for single-model attribution in the open-world setting based on final-layer inversion and anomaly detection. We show that the utilized final-layer inversion can be reduced to a convex lasso optimization problem, making our approach theoretically sound and computationally efficient. The theoretical findings are accompanied by an experimental study demonstrating the effectiveness of our approach and its flexibility to various domains.
Mike Laszkiewicz, Jonas Ricker, Johannes Lederer, Asja Fischer
ICML1
2022 Marginal Tail-Adaptive Normalizing Flows
abstract
Learning the tail behavior of a distribution is a notoriously difficult problem. By definition, the number of samples from the tail is small, and deep generative models, such as normalizing flows, tend to concentrate on learning the body of the distribution. In this paper, we focus on improving the ability of normalizing flows to correctly capture the tail behavior and, thus, form more accurate models. We prove that the marginal tailedness of an autoregressive flow can be controlled via the tailedness of the marginals of its base distribution. This theoretical insight leads us to a novel type of flows based on flexible base distributions and data-driven linear layers. An empirical analysis shows that the proposed method improves on the accuracy{—}especially on the tails of the distribution{—}and is able to generate heavy-tailed data. We demonstrate its application on a weather and climate example, in which capturing the tail behavior is essential.
Mike Laszkiewicz, Johannes Lederer, Asja Fischer
ICML1
2021 Thresholded Adaptive Validation: Tuning the Graphical Lasso for Graph Recovery
abstract
Many Machine Learning algorithms are formulated as regularized optimization problems, but their performance hinges on a regularization parameter that needs to be calibrated to each application at hand. In this paper, we propose a general calibration scheme for regularized optimization problems and apply it to the graphical lasso, which is a method for Gaussian graphical modeling. The scheme is equipped with theoretical guarantees and motivates a thresholding pipeline that can improve graph recovery. Moreover, requiring at most one line search over the regularization path, the calibration scheme is computationally more efficient than competing schemes that are based on resampling. Finally, we show in simulations that our approach can improve on the graph recovery of other approaches considerably.
Mike Laszkiewicz, Asja Fischer, Johannes Lederer
AISTATS1