The operational behavior of control operators has been studied comprehensively in the past few decades, but type systems of control operators have not. There are distinct type systems for shift, control, and shift0 without any relationship between them, and there has not been a type system that directly corresponds to control0. This paper remedies this situation by giving a uniform type system for all the four control operators. Following Danvy and Filinski’s approach, we derive a monomorphic type system from the CPS interpreter that defines the operational semantics of the four control operators. By implementing the typed CPS interpreter in Agda, we show that the CPS translation preserves types and that the calculus with all the four control operators is terminating. Furthermore, we show the relationship between our type system and the previous type systems for shift, control, and shift0.

In their paper "A Functional Abstraction of Typed Contexts", Danvy and Filinski show how to derive a monomorphic type system of the shift and reset operators from a CPS semantics. In this paper, we show how this method scales to Felleisen's control and prompt operators. Compared to shift and reset, control and prompt exhibit a more dynamic behavior, in that they can manipulate a trail of contexts surrounding the invocation of previously captured continuations. Our key observation is that, by adopting a functional representation of trails in the CPS semantics, we can derive a type system that encodes all and only constraints imposed by the CPS semantics.