Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Daniel Pflugfelder

dblp:264/6953 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0001-6187-2935ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video processing
image transform
0.412020
Practically Lossless Affine Image Transformation · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2020
Image and video processing › video frame interpolation
interpolation
0.112020
Practically Lossless Affine Image Transformation · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

spectral zero-padding · 0.4spatial zero-padding · 0.4chirp z-transform · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Practically Lossless Affine Image Transformation
abstract
In this contribution we introduce an almost lossless affine 2D image transformation method. To this end we extend the theory of the well-known Chirp-z transform to allow for fully affine transformation of general n-dimensional images. In addition we give a practical spatial and spectral zero-padding approach dramatically reducing losses of our transform, where usual transforms introduce blurring artifacts due to sub-optimal interpolation. The proposed method improves the mean squared error by approx. a factor of 1800 compared to the commonly used linear interpolation, and by a factor of 250 to the best competitor. We derive the transform from basic principles with special attention to implementation details and supplement this paper with python code for 2D images. In demonstration experiments we show the superior image quality compared to usual approaches, when using our method. However runtimes are considerably larger than when using toolbox algorithms.
Daniel Pflugfelder, Hanno Scharr
IEEE Trans. Image Process.1