Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Bohan Xuan
dblp:264/9868
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-4364-049XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
3 papers |
Systems and software security · 40% Cyber-physical and IoT security · 23% Hardware security and side channels · 21% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 45% Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs · 45% Embedded and real-time systems · 10% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Systems and software security
automated attack discovery |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Constructing Cyber-Physical System Testing Suites Using Active Sensor Fuzzing · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2023 |
Software testing
fuzzing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Constructing Cyber-Physical System Testing Suites Using Active Sensor Fuzzing · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2023 |
Hardware security and side channels
fault attacks |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Terminator on SkyNet: a practical DVFS attack on DNN hardware IP for UAV object detection · DAC 2022 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › machine learning accelerator › trustworthy machine learning accelerator
DNN accelerator security |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Terminator on SkyNet: a practical DVFS attack on DNN hardware IP for UAV object detection · DAC 2022 |
Network security › intrusion detection and prevention › intrusion detection
anomaly detection |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Active fuzzing for testing and securing cyber-physical systems · ISSTA 2020 |
Cyber-physical and IoT security
early warning system |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Active fuzzing for testing and securing cyber-physical systems · ISSTA 2020 |
Systems and software security › vulnerability discovery
fuzzing |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Active fuzzing for testing and securing cyber-physical systems · ISSTA 2020 |
Embedded and real-time systems
cyber-physical system platforms |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Active fuzzing for testing and securing cyber-physical systems · ISSTA 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
fuzzing · 1.3active learning · 1.3fault injection · 1.1dynamic voltage and frequency scaling · 1.1regression model · 0.9online active learning · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Constructing Cyber-Physical System Testing Suites Using Active Sensor FuzzingabstractCyber-physical systems (CPSs) automating critical public infrastructure face a pervasive threat of attack, motivating research into different types of countermeasures. Assessing the effectiveness of these countermeasures is challenging, however, as benchmarks are difficult to construct manually, existing automated testing solutions often make unrealistic assumptions, and blindly fuzzing is ineffective at finding attacks due to the enormous search spaces and resource requirements. In this work, we proposeactive sensor fuzzing, a fully automated approach for building test suites without requiring anya priorknowledge about a CPS. Our approach employs active learning techniques. Applied to a real-world water treatment system, our approach manages to find attacks that drive the system into 15 different unsafe states involving water flow, pressure, and tank levels, including nine that were not covered by an established attack benchmark. Furthermore, we successfully generate targeted multi-point attacks which have been long suspected to be possible. We reveal that active sensor fuzzing successfully extends the attack benchmarks generated by our previous work, an ML-guided fuzzing tool, with two more kinds of attacks. Finally, we investigate the impact of active learning on models and the reason that the model trained with active learning is able to discover more attacks. Fan Zhang 0010, Qianmei Wu, Bohan Xuan, Yuqi Chen 0001, Christopher M. Poskitt, Jun Sun 0001, Binbin Chen 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 3 |
| 2022 | Terminator on SkyNet: a practical DVFS attack on DNN hardware IP for UAV object detectionabstractWith increasing computation of various applications, dynamic voltage and frequency scaling (DVFS) is gradually deployed on FPGAs. However, its reliability and security haven't been sufficiently evaluated. In this paper, we present a practical DVFS fault attack targeting at the SkyNet accelerator IP and successfully destroy the detection accuracy. With no knowledge about the internal accelerator structure, our attack can achieve more than 98% detection accuracy loss under ten vulnerable operating point pairs (OPPs). Meanwhile, we explore the local injection with 1 ms duration and next double the intensity which can achieve more than 50% and 74% average accuracy loss respectively. Junge Xu, Bohan Xuan, Anlin Liu, Mo Sun 0001, Fan Zhang 0010, Zeke Wang, Kui Ren 0001 |
DAC | 2 |
| 2020 | Active fuzzing for testing and securing cyber-physical systemsabstractCyber-physical systems (CPSs) in critical infrastructure face a pervasive threat from attackers, motivating research into a variety of countermeasures for securing them. Assessing the effectiveness of these countermeasures is challenging, however, as realistic benchmarks of attacks are difficult to manually construct, blindly testing is ineffective due to the enormous search spaces and resource requirements, and intelligent fuzzing approaches require impractical amounts of data and network access. In this work, we propose active fuzzing, an automatic approach for finding test suites of packet-level CPS network attacks, targeting scenarios in which attackers can observe sensors and manipulate packets, but have no existing knowledge about the payload encodings. Our approach learns regression models for predicting sensor values that will result from sampled network packets, and uses these predictions to guide a search for payload manipulations (i.e. bit flips) most likely to drive the CPS into an unsafe state. Key to our solution is the use of online active learning, which iteratively updates the models by sampling payloads that are estimated to maximally improve them. We evaluate the efficacy of active fuzzing by implementing it for a water purification plant testbed, finding it can automatically discover a test suite of flow, pressure, and over/underflow attacks, all with substantially less time, data, and network access than the most comparable approach. Finally, we demonstrate that our prediction models can also be utilised as countermeasures themselves, implementing them as anomaly detectors and early warning systems. Yuqi Chen 0001, Bohan Xuan, Christopher M. Poskitt, Jun Sun 0001, Fan Zhang 0010 |
ISSTA | 2 |