Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yuefei Chen
dblp:265/7099
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 67% Language models and text generation · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
causal reasoning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | CounterBench: Evaluating and Improving Counterfactual Reasoning in Large Language Models · AAAI 2026 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › causal reasoning
counterfactual reasoning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | CounterBench: Evaluating and Improving Counterfactual Reasoning in Large Language Models · AAAI 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model reasoning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | CounterBench: Evaluating and Improving Counterfactual Reasoning in Large Language Models · AAAI 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
iterative reasoning · 1.0chain-of-thought · 1.0backtracking · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | CounterBench: Evaluating and Improving Counterfactual Reasoning in Large Language ModelsabstractCounterfactual reasoning is widely recognized as one of the most challenging and intricate aspects of causality in artificial intelligence. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of large language models (LLMs) in counterfactual reasoning. In contrast to previous studies that primarily focus on commonsense causal reasoning, where LLMs often rely on prior knowledge for inference, we specifically assess their ability to perform counterfactual inference using a set of formal rules. To support this evaluation, we introduce a new benchmark dataset, CounterBench, comprising 1.2K counterfactual reasoning questions. The dataset is designed with varying levels of difficulty, diverse causal graph structures, distinct types of counterfactual questions, and multiple nonsensical name variants. Our experiments demonstrate that counterfactual reasoning poses a significant challenge for LLMs, with most models performing at levels comparable to random guessing. To enhance LLM's counterfactual reasoning ability, we propose a novel reasoning paradigm, CoIn, which guides LLMs through iterative reasoning and backtracking to systematically explore counterfactual solutions. Experimental results show that our method significantly improves LLM performance on counterfactual reasoning tasks and consistently enhances performance across different LLMs. Yuefei Chen, Vivek K. Singh 0001, Ruixiang Tang |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2023 | ForETaxi: Data-Driven Fleet-Oriented Charging Resource Allocation in Large-Scale Electric Taxi NetworksabstractCharging processes are the key to promoting electric taxis and improving their operational efficiency due to frequent charging activities and long charging time. Nevertheless, optimizing charging resource allocation in real time is extremely challenging because of uneven charging demand/supply distributions, heuristic-based charging behaviors of drivers, and city-scale of the fleets. The existing solutions have utilized real-time contextual information for charging recommendation, but they do not consider the much-richer fleet information, leading to the suboptimal individual-based charging recommendation. In this paper, we design a data-driven fleet-oriented charging recommendation system for charging resource allocation called ForETaxi for electric taxis , which aims to minimize the overall charging overhead for the entire fleet, instead of individual vehicles. ForETaxi considers not only current charging requests but also possible charging requests of other nearby electric taxis in the near future by inferring their status in real time. More importantly, we implement ForETaxi with multiple types of sensor data from the Chinese Shenzhen city including GPS data, and taxi transaction data from more than 13,000 electric taxis, combined with road network data and charging station data. The data-driven evaluation results show that compared to the state-of-the-art individual-based recommendation methods, our fleet-oriented ForETaxi outperforms them by 16% in the total charging time reduction and 82% in the queuing time reduction. Guang Wang 0001, Yuefei Chen, Shuai Wang 0008, Fan Zhang 0019, Desheng Zhang 0002 |
ACM Trans. Sens. Networks | 2 |