Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Prasanna Sanjay Raut

dblp:266/3254 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 56% Approximation and online algorithms · 25% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 20%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization › submodular optimization › submodular maximization
online submodular maximization
0.922021
Online DR-Submodular Maximization: Minimizing Regret and Constraint Violation · AAAI 2021
A Single Recipe for Online Submodular Maximization with Adversarial or Stochastic Constraints · NeurIPS 2020
Approximation and online algorithms
online algorithms
0.512021
Online DR-Submodular Maximization: Minimizing Regret and Constraint Violation · AAAI 2021
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
regret minimization
0.512021
Online DR-Submodular Maximization: Minimizing Regret and Constraint Violation · AAAI 2021
Mathematical optimization
submodular optimization
0.512021
Online DR-Submodular Maximization: Minimizing Regret and Constraint Violation · AAAI 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

lagrangian method · 0.5frank-wolfe · 0.5convex constraints · 0.4DR-submodular optimization · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Online DR-Submodular Maximization: Minimizing Regret and Constraint Violation
abstract
In this paper, we consider online continuous DR-submodular maximization with linear stochastic long-term constraints. Compared to the prior work on online submodular maximization, our setting introduces the extra complication of stochastic linear constraint functions that are i.i.d. generated at each round. In particular, at each time step a DR-submodular utility function and a constraint vector, i.i.d. generated from an unknown distribution, are revealed after committing to an action and we aim to maximize the overall utility while the expected cumulative resource consumption is below a fixed budget. Stochastic long-term constraints arise naturally in applications where there is a limited budget or resource available and resource consumption at each step is governed by stochastically time-varying environments. We propose the Online Lagrangian Frank-Wolfe (OLFW) algorithm to solve this class of online problems. We analyze the performance of the OLFW algorithm and we obtain sub-linear regret bounds as well as sub-linear cumulative constraint violation bounds, both in expectation and with high probability.
Prasanna Sanjay Raut, Omid Sadeghi, Maryam Fazel
AAAI1
2020 A Single Recipe for Online Submodular Maximization with Adversarial or Stochastic Constraints
abstract
In this paper, we consider an online optimization problem in which the reward functions are DR-submodular, and in addition to maximizing the total reward, the sequence of decisions must satisfy some convex constraints on average. Specifically, at each round $t\in\{1,\dots,T\}$, upon committing to an action $x_t$, a DR-submodular utility function $f_t(\cdot)$ and a convex constraint function $g_t(\cdot)$ are revealed, and the goal is to maximize the overall utility while ensuring the average of the constraint functions $\frac{1}{T}\sum_{t=1}^T g_t(x_t)$ is non-positive. Such cumulative constraints arise naturally in applications where the average resource consumption is required to remain below a prespecified threshold. We study this problem under an adversarial model and a stochastic model for the convex constraints, where the functions $g_t$ can vary arbitrarily or according to an i.i.d. process over time slots $t\in\{1,\dots,T\}$, respectively. We propose a single algorithm which achieves sub-linear (with respect to $T$) regret as well as sub-linear constraint violation bounds in both settings, without prior knowledge of the regime. Prior works have studied this problem in the special case of linear constraint functions. Our results not only improve upon the existing bounds under linear cumulative constraints, but also give the first sub-linear bounds for general convex long-term constraints.
Omid Sadeghi, Prasanna Sanjay Raut, Maryam Fazel
NeurIPS2