Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alden Hung
dblp:266/7972
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 77% Reinforcement learning · 23% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning
predictive representation learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Probing Emergent Semantics in Predictive Agents via Question Answering · ICML 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simcore · 0.4question answering decoder · 0.4action-conditional CPC · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Probing Emergent Semantics in Predictive Agents via Question AnsweringabstractRecent work has shown how predictive modeling can endow agents with rich knowledge of their surroundings, improving their ability to act in complex environments. We propose question-answering as a general paradigm to decode and understand the representations that such agents develop, applying our method to two recent approaches to predictive modelling - action-conditional CPC (Guo et al., 2018) and SimCore (Gregor et al., 2019). After training agents with these predictive objectives in a visually-rich, 3D environment with an assortment of objects, colors, shapes, and spatial configurations, we probe their internal state representations with a host of synthetic (English) questions, without backpropagating gradients from the question-answering decoder into the agent. The performance of different agents when probed in this way reveals that they learn to encode factual, and seemingly compositional, information about objects, properties and spatial relations from their physical environment. Our approach is intuitive, i.e. humans can easily interpret the responses of the model as opposed to inspecting continuous vectors, and model-agnostic, i.e. applicable to any modeling approach. By revealing the implicit knowledge of objects, quantities, properties and relations acquired by agents as they learn, question-conditional agent probing can stimulate the design and development of stronger predictive learning objectives. Federico Carnevale, Hamza Merzic, Laura Rimell, Rosália G. Schneider, Josh Abramson, Alden Hung, Arun Ahuja, Stephen Clark, Greg Wayne, Felix Hill |
ICML | 7 |