Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

William T. Redman

dblp:266/7985 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 70% Deep learning architectures and training · 15% Optimization for machine learning · 11%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
1.122022
Universality of Winning Tickets: A Renormalization Group Perspective · ICML 2022
An Operator Theoretic View On Pruning Deep Neural Networks · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
pruning
1.122022
Universality of Winning Tickets: A Renormalization Group Perspective · ICML 2022
An Operator Theoretic View On Pruning Deep Neural Networks · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training dynamics
0.812024
Identifying Equivalent Training Dynamics · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › pruning
iterative magnitude pruning
0.612022
Universality of Winning Tickets: A Renormalization Group Perspective · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › sparse training
lottery ticket hypothesis
0.612022
Universality of Winning Tickets: A Renormalization Group Perspective · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
optimization
0.412020
Optimizing Neural Networks via Koopman Operator Theory · NeurIPS 2020
Mathematical optimization
dynamical systems
0.412020
Optimizing Neural Networks via Koopman Operator Theory · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient-based optimization
gradient descent
0.112020
Optimizing Neural Networks via Koopman Operator Theory · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › efficient training
training acceleration
0.112020
Optimizing Neural Networks via Koopman Operator Theory · NeurIPS 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

koopman operator theory · 1.6dynamical systems analysis · 0.9topological conjugacy · 0.8renormalization group theory · 0.6operator theory · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Identifying Equivalent Training Dynamics
abstract
Study of the nonlinear evolution deep neural network (DNN) parameters undergo during training has uncovered regimes of distinct dynamical behavior. While a detailed understanding of these phenomena has the potential to advance improvements in training efficiency and robustness, the lack of methods for identifying when DNN models have equivalent dynamics limits the insight that can be gained from prior work. Topological conjugacy, a notion from dynamical systems theory, provides a precise definition of dynamical equivalence, offering a possible route to address this need. However, topological conjugacies have historically been challenging to compute. By leveraging advances in Koopman operator theory, we develop a framework for identifying conjugate and non-conjugate training dynamics. To validate our approach, we demonstrate that comparing Koopman eigenvalues can correctly identify a known equivalence between online mirror descent and online gradient descent. We then utilize our approach to: (a) identify non-conjugate training dynamics between shallow and wide fully connected neural networks; (b) characterize the early phase of training dynamics in convolutional neural networks; (c) uncover non-conjugate training dynamics in Transformers that do and do not undergo grokking. Our results, across a range of DNN architectures, illustrate the flexibility of our framework and highlight its potential for shedding new light on training dynamics.
William T. Redman, Juan M. Bello-Rivas, Maria Fonoberova, Ryan Mohr, Ioannis G. Kevrekidis, Igor Mezic
NeurIPS1
2022 An Operator Theoretic View On Pruning Deep Neural Networks
William T. Redman, Maria Fonoberova, Ryan Mohr, Ioannis G. Kevrekidis, Igor Mezic
ICLR1
2022 Universality of Winning Tickets: A Renormalization Group Perspective
abstract
Foundational work on the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis has suggested an exciting corollary: winning tickets found in the context of one task can be transferred to similar tasks, possibly even across different architectures. This has generated broad interest, but methods to study this universality are lacking. We make use of renormalization group theory, a powerful tool from theoretical physics, to address this need. We find that iterative magnitude pruning, the principal algorithm used for discovering winning tickets, is a renormalization group scheme, and can be viewed as inducing a flow in parameter space. We demonstrate that ResNet-50 models with transferable winning tickets have flows with common properties, as would be expected from the theory. Similar observations are made for BERT models, with evidence that their flows are near fixed points. Additionally, we leverage our framework to study winning tickets transferred across ResNet architectures, observing that smaller models have flows with more uniform properties than larger models, complicating transfer between them.
William T. Redman, Tianlong Chen 0001, Zhangyang Wang, Akshunna S. Dogra
ICML1
2020 Optimizing Neural Networks via Koopman Operator Theory
abstract
Koopman operator theory, a powerful framework for discovering the underlying dynamics of nonlinear dynamical systems, was recently shown to be intimately connected with neural network training. In this work, we take the first steps in making use of this connection. As Koopman operator theory is a linear theory, a successful implementation of it in evolving network weights and biases offers the promise of accelerated training, especially in the context of deep networks, where optimization is inherently a non-convex problem. We show that Koopman operator theoretic methods allow for accurate predictions of weights and biases of feedforward, fully connected deep networks over a non-trivial range of training time. During this window, we find that our approach is >10x faster than various gradient descent based methods (e.g. Adam, Adadelta, Adagrad), in line with our complexity analysis. We end by highlighting open questions in this exciting intersection between dynamical systems and neural network theory. We highlight additional methods by which our results could be expanded to broader classes of networks and larger training intervals, which shall be the focus of future work.
Akshunna S. Dogra, William T. Redman
NeurIPS2