VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Max Hirschhorn
dblp:266/8361
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 77% Requirements engineering and software design · 23% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software testing › model-based testing
model-based test generation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | eXtreme Modelling in Practice · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020 |
Software testing
model-based testing |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | eXtreme Modelling in Practice · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020 |
Requirements engineering and software design › software architecture
architecture-implementation conformance |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | eXtreme Modelling in Practice · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020 |
Requirements engineering and software design
formal specification |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | eXtreme Modelling in Practice · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
TLA+ · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | eXtreme Modelling in PracticeabstractFormal modelling is a powerful tool for developing complex systems. At MongoDB, we use TLA + to model and verify multiple aspects of several systems. Ensuring conformance between a specification and its implementation can add value to any specification; it can avoid transcription errors, prevent bugs as a large organization rapidly develops the specified code, and even keep multiple implementations of the same specification in sync. In this paper, we explore model-based testing as a tool for ensuring specification-implementation conformance. We attempted two case studies: model-based trace-checking (MBTC) in the MongoDB Server's replication protocol and model-based test-case generation (MBTCG) in MongoDB Realm Sync's operational transformation algorithm. We found MBTC to be impractical for testing that the Server conformed to a highly abstract specification. MBTCG was highly successful for Realm Sync, however. We analyze why one technique succeeded and the other failed, and advise future implementers making similar attempts at model-based testing. A. Jesse Jiryu Davis, Max Hirschhorn, Judah Schvimer |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 2 |