Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Max Hirschhorn

dblp:266/8361 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 77% Requirements engineering and software design · 23%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing › model-based testing
model-based test generation
0.412020
eXtreme Modelling in Practice · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020
Software testing
model-based testing
0.412020
eXtreme Modelling in Practice · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020
Requirements engineering and software design › software architecture
architecture-implementation conformance
0.112020
eXtreme Modelling in Practice · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020
Requirements engineering and software design
formal specification
0.112020
eXtreme Modelling in Practice · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

TLA+ · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 eXtreme Modelling in Practice
abstract
Formal modelling is a powerful tool for developing complex systems. At MongoDB, we use TLA + to model and verify multiple aspects of several systems. Ensuring conformance between a specification and its implementation can add value to any specification; it can avoid transcription errors, prevent bugs as a large organization rapidly develops the specified code, and even keep multiple implementations of the same specification in sync. In this paper, we explore model-based testing as a tool for ensuring specification-implementation conformance. We attempted two case studies: model-based trace-checking (MBTC) in the MongoDB Server's replication protocol and model-based test-case generation (MBTCG) in MongoDB Realm Sync's operational transformation algorithm. We found MBTC to be impractical for testing that the Server conformed to a highly abstract specification. MBTCG was highly successful for Realm Sync, however. We analyze why one technique succeeded and the other failed, and advise future implementers making similar attempts at model-based testing.
A. Jesse Jiryu Davis, Max Hirschhorn, Judah Schvimer
Proc. VLDB Endow.2