Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Changmin Yu
dblp:266/9733
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
5as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 5 first-author · 7 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 48% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 40% Representation and self-supervised learning · 11% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 20 heaviest of 22, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model › factor analysis
gaussian process factor analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Discovering Temporally Compositional Neural Manifolds with Switching Infinite GPFA · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Discovering Temporally Compositional Neural Manifolds with Switching Infinite GPFA · ICLR 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience
neural population analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Discovering Temporally Compositional Neural Manifolds with Switching Infinite GPFA · ICLR 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience
neuroinformatics |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Discovering Temporally Compositional Neural Manifolds with Switching Infinite GPFA · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
exploration |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Successor-Predecessor Intrinsic Exploration · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration
intrinsic motivation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Successor-Predecessor Intrinsic Exploration · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
sparse reward reinforcement learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Successor-Predecessor Intrinsic Exploration · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference › amortized inference
amortized variational inference |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Structured Recognition for Generative Models with Explaining Away · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Structured Recognition for Generative Models with Explaining Away · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › function approximation › representation learning for reinforcement learning
policy embedding |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | What about Inputting Policy in Value Function: Policy Representation and Policy-Extended Value Function Approximator · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › function approximation › representation learning for reinforcement learning
policy representation learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | What about Inputting Policy in Value Function: Policy Representation and Policy-Extended Value Function Approximator · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › latent representation learning
state representation learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Learning State Representations via Retracing in Reinforcement Learning · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
value-based reinforcement learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | What about Inputting Policy in Value Function: Policy Representation and Policy-Extended Value Function Approximator · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
value function approximation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | What about Inputting Policy in Value Function: Policy Representation and Policy-Extended Value Function Approximator · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Structured Recognition for Generative Models with Explaining Away · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › computational neuroscience › neural coding
grid cell |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Prediction and generalisation over directed actions by grid cells · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian nonparametric model |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Discovering Temporally Compositional Neural Manifolds with Switching Infinite GPFA · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian nonparametric model
indian buffet process |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Discovering Temporally Compositional Neural Manifolds with Switching Infinite GPFA · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
deep reinforcement learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Successor-Predecessor Intrinsic Exploration · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
unsupervised learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Structured Recognition for Generative Models with Explaining Away · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variational expectation-maximization · 1.7sparse variational gaussian process · 1.7successor representation · 0.7predecessor representation · 0.7variational message passing · 0.6self-supervised representation learning · 0.6retracing · 0.6representation learning · 0.6proximal policy optimization · 0.6gaussian process factor analysis · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Discovering Temporally Compositional Neural Manifolds with Switching Infinite GPFAabstractGaussian Process Factor Analysis (GPFA) is a powerful latent variable model for extracting low-dimensional manifolds underlying population neural activities. However, one limitation of standard GPFA models is that the number of latent factors needs to be pre-specified or selected through heuristic-based processes, and that all factors contribute at all times. We propose the infinite GPFA model, a fully Bayesian non-parametric extension of the classical GPFA by incorporating an Indian Buffet Process (IBP) prior over the factor loading process, such that it is possible to infer a potentially infinite set of latent factors, and the identity of those factors that contribute to neural firings in a compositional manner at \textit{each} time point. Learning and inference in the infinite GPFA model is performed through variational expectation-maximisation, and we additionally propose scalable extensions based on sparse variational Gaussian Process methods. We empirically demonstrate that the infinite GPFA model correctly infers dynamically changing activations of latent factors on a synthetic dataset. By fitting the infinite GPFA model to population activities of hippocampal place cells during spatial tasks with alternating random foraging and spatial memory phases, we identify novel non-trivial and behaviourally meaningful dynamics in the neural encoding process. Changmin Yu, Maneesh Sahani, Máté Lengyel |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2023 | Unsupervised representation learning with recognition-parametrised probabilistic modelsabstractWe introduce a new approach to probabilistic unsupervised learning based on the recognition-parametrised model (RPM): a normalised semi-parametric hypothesis class for joint distributions over observed and latent variables. Under the key assumption that observations are conditionally independent given latents, the RPM combines parametric prior and observation-conditioned latent distributions with non-parametric observation marginals. This approach leads to a flexible learnt recognition model capturing latent dependence between observations, without the need for an explicit, parametric generative model. The RPM admits exact maximum-likelihood learning for discrete latents, even for powerful neural network-based recognition. We develop effective approximations applicable in the continuous latent case. Experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the RPM on high-dimensional data, learning image classification from weak indirect supervision; direct image-level latent Dirichlet allocation; and Recognition-Parametrised Gaussian Process Factor Analysis (RP-GPFA) applied to multi-factorial spatiotemporal datasets. The RPM provides a powerful framework to discover meaningful latent structure underlying observational data, a function critical to both animal and artificial intelligence. William I. Walker, Hugo Soulat, Changmin Yu, Maneesh Sahani |
AISTATS | 3 |
| 2023 | Successor-Predecessor Intrinsic ExplorationabstractExploration is essential in reinforcement learning, particularly in environments where external rewards are sparse. Here we focus on exploration with intrinsic rewards, where the agent transiently augments the external rewards with self-generated intrinsic rewards. Although the study of intrinsic rewards has a long history, existing methods focus on composing the intrinsic reward based on measures of future prospects of states, ignoring the information contained in the retrospective structure of transition sequences. Here we argue that the agent can utilise retrospective information to generate explorative behaviour with structure-awareness, facilitating efficient exploration based on global instead of local information. We propose Successor-Predecessor Intrinsic Exploration (SPIE), an exploration algorithm based on a novel intrinsic reward combining prospective and retrospective information. We show that SPIE yields more efficient and ethologically plausible exploratory behaviour in environments with sparse rewards and bottleneck states than competing methods. We also implement SPIE in deep reinforcement learning agents, and show that the resulting agent achieves stronger empirical performance than existing methods on sparse-reward Atari games. Changmin Yu, Neil Burgess, Maneesh Sahani, Samuel Gershman |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2022 | What about Inputting Policy in Value Function: Policy Representation and Policy-Extended Value Function ApproximatorabstractWe study Policy-extended Value Function Approximator (PeVFA) in Reinforcement Learning (RL), which extends conventional value function approximator (VFA) to take as input not only the state (and action) but also an explicit policy representation. Such an extension enables PeVFA to preserve values of multiple policies at the same time and brings an appealing characteristic, i.e., value generalization among policies. We formally analyze the value generalization under Generalized Policy Iteration (GPI). From theoretical and empirical lens, we show that generalized value estimates offered by PeVFA may have lower initial approximation error to true values of successive policies, which is expected to improve consecutive value approximation during GPI. Based on above clues, we introduce a new form of GPI with PeVFA which leverages the value generalization along policy improvement path. Moreover, we propose a representation learning framework for RL policy, providing several approaches to learn effective policy embeddings from policy network parameters or state-action pairs. In our experiments, we evaluate the efficacy of value generalization offered by PeVFA and policy representation learning in several OpenAI Gym continuous control tasks. For a representative instance of algorithm implementation, Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) re-implemented under the paradigm of GPI with PeVFA achieves about 40% performance improvement on its vanilla counterpart in most environments. Hongyao Tang, Zhaopeng Meng, Jianye Hao, Chen Chen 0077, Daniel Graves, Dong Li 0016, Changmin Yu, Hangyu Mao, Wulong Liu, Yaodong Yang 0002, Wenyuan Tao |
AAAI | 7 |
| 2022 | Learning State Representations via Retracing in Reinforcement Learning
Changmin Yu, Dong Li 0016, Jianye Hao, Jun Wang 0012, Neil Burgess |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2022 | Structured Recognition for Generative Models with Explaining AwayabstractA key goal of unsupervised learning is to go beyond density estimation and sample generation to reveal the structure inherent within observed data. Such structure can be expressed in the pattern of interactions between explanatory latent variables captured through a probabilistic graphical model. Although the learning of structured graphical models has a long history, much recent work in unsupervised modelling has instead emphasised flexible deep-network-based generation, either transforming independent latent generators to model complex data or assuming that distinct observed variables are derived from different latent nodes. Here, we extend amortised variational inference to incorporate structured factors over multiple variables, able to capture the observation-induced posterior dependence between latents that results from “explaining away” and thus allow complex observations to depend on multiple nodes of a structured graph. We show that appropriately parametrised factors can be combined efficiently with variational message passing in rich graphical structures. We instantiate the framework in nonlinear Gaussian Process Factor Analysis, evaluating the structured recognition framework using synthetic data from known generative processes. We fit the GPFA model to high-dimensional neural spike data from the hippocampus of freely moving rodents, where the model successfully identifies latent signals that correlate with behavioural covariates. Changmin Yu, Hugo Soulat, Neil Burgess, Maneesh Sahani |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2021 | Prediction and generalisation over directed actions by grid cells
Changmin Yu, Timothy Edward John Behrens, Neil Burgess |
ICLR | 1 |