VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alexander Norcliffe
dblp:267/5290 · also Alexander Luke Ian Norcliffe
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-9983-8027ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 42% Deep learning architectures and training · 26% Trustworthy machine learning · 11% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › experimental design
active feature acquisition |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Stochastic Encodings for Active Feature Acquisition · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Stochastic Encodings for Active Feature Acquisition · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning
deep ensembles |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Composite Feature Selection Using Deep Ensembles · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
feature selection |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Composite Feature Selection Using Deep Ensembles · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Composite Feature Selection Using Deep Ensembles · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
neural differential equations |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Neural ODE Processes · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
stochastic processes |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Neural ODE Processes · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural differential equations
neural ordinary differential equations |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | On Second Order Behaviour in Augmented Neural ODEs · NeurIPS 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reinforcement learning · 0.9latent variable model · 0.9conditional mutual information · 0.9linear and non-linear interaction modeling · 0.6deep ensembles · 0.6neural ODE · 0.5gaussian process · 0.5augmented dimensions · 0.4adjoint sensitivity method · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Stochastic Encodings for Active Feature AcquisitionabstractActive Feature Acquisition is an instance-wise, sequential decision making problem. The aim is to dynamically select which feature to measure based on current observations, independently for each test instance. Common approaches either use Reinforcement Learning, which experiences training difficulties, or greedily maximize the conditional mutual information of the label and unobserved features, which makes myopic acquisitions. To address these shortcomings, we introduce a latent variable model, trained in a supervised manner. Acquisitions are made by reasoning about the features across many possible unobserved realizations in a stochastic latent space. Extensive evaluation on a large range of synthetic and real datasets demonstrates that our approach reliably outperforms a diverse set of baselines. Alexander Norcliffe, Fergus Imrie, Mihaela van der Schaar, Pietro Liò |
ICML | 1 |
| 2023 | SurvivalGAN: Generating Time-to-Event Data for Survival AnalysisabstractSynthetic data is becoming an increasingly promising technology, and successful applications can improve privacy, fairness, and data democratization. While there are many methods for generating synthetic tabular data, the task remains non-trivial and unexplored for specific scenarios. One such scenario is survival data. Here, the key difficulty is censoring: for some instances, we are not aware of the time of event, or if one even occurred. Imbalances in censoring and time horizons cause generative models to experience three new failure modes specific to survival analysis: (1) generating too few at-risk members; (2) generating too many at-risk members; and (3) censoring too early. We formalize these failure modes and provide three new generative metrics to quantify them. Following this, we propose SurvivalGAN, a generative model that handles survival data firstly by addressing the imbalance in the censoring and event horizons, and secondly by using a dedicated mechanism for approximating time-to-event/censoring. We evaluate this method via extensive experiments on medical datasets. SurvivalGAN outperforms multiple baselines at generating survival data, and in particular addresses the failure modes as measured by the new metrics, in addition to improving downstream performance of survival models trained on the synthetic data. Alexander Norcliffe, Bogdan Cebere, Fergus Imrie, Pietro Liò, Mihaela van der Schaar |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2022 | Composite Feature Selection Using Deep EnsemblesabstractIn many real world problems, features do not act alone but in combination with each other. For example, in genomics, diseases might not be caused by any single mutation but require the presence of multiple mutations. Prior work on feature selection either seeks to identify individual features or can only determine relevant groups from a predefined set. We investigate the problem of discovering groups of predictive features without predefined grouping. To do so, we define predictive groups in terms of linear and non-linear interactions between features. We introduce a novel deep learning architecture that uses an ensemble of feature selection models to find predictive groups, without requiring candidate groups to be provided. The selected groups are sparse and exhibit minimum overlap. Furthermore, we propose a new metric to measure similarity between discovered groups and the ground truth. We demonstrate the utility our model on multiple synthetic tasks and semi-synthetic chemistry datasets, where the ground truth structure is known, as well as an image dataset and a real-world cancer dataset. Fergus Imrie, Alexander Norcliffe, Pietro Liò, Mihaela van der Schaar |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2021 | Neural ODE Processes
Alexander Norcliffe, Cristian Bodnar, Ben Day, Jacob Moss, Pietro Liò |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2020 | On Second Order Behaviour in Augmented Neural ODEsabstractNeural Ordinary Differential Equations (NODEs) are a new class of models that transform data continuously through infinite-depth architectures. The continuous nature of NODEs has made them particularly suitable for learning the dynamics of complex physical systems. While previous work has mostly been focused on first order ODEs, the dynamics of many systems, especially in classical physics, are governed by second order laws. In this work, we consider Second Order Neural ODEs (SONODEs). We show how the adjoint sensitivity method can be extended to SONODEs and prove that the optimisation of a first order coupled ODE is equivalent and computationally more efficient. Furthermore, we extend the theoretical understanding of the broader class of Augmented NODEs (ANODEs) by showing they can also learn higher order dynamics with a minimal number of augmented dimensions, but at the cost of interpretability. This indicates that the advantages of ANODEs go beyond the extra space offered by the augmented dimensions, as originally thought. Finally, we compare SONODEs and ANODEs on synthetic and real dynamical systems and demonstrate that the inductive biases of the former generally result in faster training and better performance. Alexander Norcliffe, Cristian Bodnar, Ben Day, Nikola Simidjievski, Pietro Liò |
NeurIPS | 1 |