VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Vincent Plassier
dblp:267/5658
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
6as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 6 first-author · 7 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 64% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 20% Efficient and distributed learning · 12% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation › conformal prediction
conditional coverage |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | Rectifying Conformity Scores for Better Conditional Coverage · ICML 2025 Probabilistic Conformal Prediction with Approximate Conditional Validity · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
conformal prediction |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | Rectifying Conformity Scores for Better Conditional Coverage · ICML 2025 Probabilistic Conformal Prediction with Approximate Conditional Validity · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › density estimation
conditional density estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Probabilistic Conformal Prediction with Approximate Conditional Validity · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation › conformal prediction
federated conformal prediction |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Conformal Prediction for Federated Uncertainty Quantification Under Label Shift · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Conformal Prediction for Federated Uncertainty Quantification Under Label Shift · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | DG-LMC: A Turn-key and Scalable Synchronous Distributed MCMC Algorithm via Langevin Monte Carlo within Gibbs · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation
confidence set construction |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Rectifying Conformity Scores for Better Conditional Coverage · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Rectifying Conformity Scores for Better Conditional Coverage · ICML 2025 |
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Conformal Prediction for Federated Uncertainty Quantification Under Label Shift · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed inference
distributed bayesian inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | DG-LMC: A Turn-key and Scalable Synchronous Distributed MCMC Algorithm via Langevin Monte Carlo within Gibbs · ICML 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
quantile regression · 3.1conformal prediction · 2.2importance weighting · 1.3differential privacy · 1.3trainable transformation · 0.9split conformal prediction · 0.9langevin monte carlo · 0.5gibbs sampling · 0.5distributed MCMC · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Probabilistic Conformal Prediction with Approximate Conditional ValidityabstractWe develop a new method for generating prediction sets that combines the flexibility of conformal methods with an estimate of the conditional distribution $\textup{P}_{Y \mid X}$. Existing methods, such as conformalized quantile regression and probabilistic conformal prediction, usually provide only a marginal coverage guarantee. In contrast, our approach extends these frameworks to achieve approximately conditional coverage, which is crucial for many practical applications. Our prediction sets adapt to the behavior of the predictive distribution, making them effective even under high heteroscedasticity. While exact conditional guarantees are infeasible without assumptions on the underlying data distribution, we derive non-asymptotic bounds that depend on the total variation distance of the conditional distribution and its estimate. Using extensive simulations, we show that our method consistently outperforms existing approaches in terms of conditional coverage, leading to more reliable statistical inference in a variety of applications. Vincent Plassier, Alexander Fishkov, Mohsen Guizani, Maxim Panov, Eric Moulines |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2025 | Rectifying Conformity Scores for Better Conditional CoverageabstractWe present a new method for generating confidence sets within the split conformal prediction framework. Our method performs a trainable transformation of any given conformity score to improve conditional coverage while ensuring exact marginal coverage. The transformation is based on an estimate of the conditional quantile of conformity scores. The resulting method is particularly beneficial for constructing adaptive confidence sets in multi-output problems where standard conformal quantile regression approaches have limited applicability. We develop a theoretical bound that captures the influence of the accuracy of the quantile estimate on the approximate conditional validity, unlike classical bounds for conformal prediction methods that only offer marginal coverage. We experimentally show that our method is highly adaptive to the local data structure and outperforms existing methods in terms of conditional coverage, improving the reliability of statistical inference in various applications. Vincent Plassier, Alexander Fishkov, Victor Dheur, Mohsen Guizani, Souhaib Ben Taieb, Maxim Panov, Eric Moulines |
ICML | 1 |
| 2024 | Efficient Conformal Prediction under Data HeterogeneityabstractConformal prediction (CP) stands out as a robust framework for uncertainty quantification, which is crucial for ensuring the reliability of predictions. However, common CP methods heavily rely on the data exchangeability, a condition often violated in practice. Existing approaches for tackling non-exchangeability lead to methods that are not computable beyond the simplest examples. In this work, we introduce a new efficient approach to CP that produces provably valid confidence sets for fairly general non-exchangeable data distributions. We illustrate the general theory with applications to the challenging setting of federated learning under data heterogeneity between agents. Our method allows constructing provably valid personalized prediction sets for agents in a fully federated way. The effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated in a series of experiments on real-world datasets. Vincent Plassier, Nikita Kotelevskii, Aleksandr Rubashevskii, Fedor Noskov, Maksim Velikanov, Alexander Fishkov, Samuel Horváth, Martin Takác 0001, Eric Moulines, Maxim Panov |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2023 | Federated Averaging Langevin Dynamics: Toward a unified theory and new algorithmsabstractThis paper focuses on Bayesian inference in a federated learning context (FL). While several distributed MCMC algorithms have been proposed, few consider the specific limitations of FL such as communication bottlenecks and statistical heterogeneity. Recently, Federated Averaging Langevin Dynamics (FALD) was introduced, which extends the Federated Averaging algorithm to Bayesian inference. We obtain a novel tight non-asymptotic upper bound on the Wasserstein distance to the global posterior for FALD. This bound highlights the effects of statistical heterogeneity, which causes a drift in the local updates that negatively impacts convergence. We propose a new algorithm VR-FALD* that uses control variates to correct the client drift. We establish non-asymptotic bounds showing that VR-FALD* is not affected by statistical heterogeneity. Finally, we illustrate our results on several FL benchmarks for Bayesian inference. Vincent Plassier, Eric Moulines, Alain Durmus |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2023 | Conformal Prediction for Federated Uncertainty Quantification Under Label ShiftabstractFederated Learning (FL) is a machine learning framework where many clients collaboratively train models while keeping the training data decentralized. Despite recent advances in FL, the uncertainty quantification topic (UQ) remains partially addressed. Among UQ methods, conformal prediction (CP) approaches provides distribution-free guarantees under minimal assumptions. We develop a new federated conformal prediction method based on quantile regression and take into account privacy constraints. This method takes advantage of importance weighting to effectively address the label shift between agents and provides theoretical guarantees for both valid coverage of the prediction sets and differential privacy. Extensive experimental studies demonstrate that this method outperforms current competitors. Vincent Plassier, Mehdi Makni, Aleksandr Rubashevskii, Eric Moulines, Maxim Panov |
ICML | 1 |
| 2022 | QLSD: Quantised Langevin Stochastic Dynamics for Bayesian Federated LearningabstractThe objective of Federated Learning (FL) is to perform statistical inference for data which are decentralised and stored locally on networked clients. FL raises many constraints which include privacy and data ownership, communication overhead, statistical heterogeneity, and partial client participation. In this paper, we address these problems in the framework of the Bayesian paradigm. To this end, we propose a novel federated Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm, referred to as Quantised Langevin Stochastic Dynamics which may be seen as an extension to the FL setting of Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics, which handles the communication bottleneck using gradient compression. To improve performance, we then introduce variance reduction techniques, which lead to two improved versions coined QLSD$^\star$ and QLSD$^{++}$. We give both non-asymptotic and asymptotic convergence guarantees for the proposed algorithms. We illustrate their performances using various Bayesian Federated Learning benchmarks. Maxime Vono, Vincent Plassier, Alain Durmus, Aymeric Dieuleveut, Eric Moulines |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2021 | DG-LMC: A Turn-key and Scalable Synchronous Distributed MCMC Algorithm via Langevin Monte Carlo within GibbsabstractPerforming reliable Bayesian inference on a big data scale is becoming a keystone in the modern era of machine learning. A workhorse class of methods to achieve this task are Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms and their design to handle distributed datasets has been the subject of many works. However, existing methods are not completely either reliable or computationally efficient. In this paper, we propose to fill this gap in the case where the dataset is partitioned and stored on computing nodes within a cluster under a master/slaves architecture. We derive a user-friendly centralised distributed MCMC algorithm with provable scaling in high-dimensional settings. We illustrate the relevance of the proposed methodology on both synthetic and real data experiments. Vincent Plassier, Maxime Vono, Alain Durmus, Eric Moulines |
ICML | 1 |