Dimensionality reduction techniques help analysts make sense of complex, high-dimensional spatial datasets, such as multiplexed tissue imaging, satellite imagery, and astronomical observations, by projecting data attributes into a two-dimensional space. However, these techniques typically abstract away crucial spatial, positional, and morphological contexts, complicating interpretation and limiting insights. To address these limitations, we present SEAL, an interactive visual analytics system designed to bridge the gap between abstract 2D embeddings and their rich spatial imaging context. SEAL introduces a novel hybrid-embedding visualization that preserves image and morphological information while integrating critical high-dimensional feature data. By adapting set visualization methods, SEAL allows analysts to identify, visualize, and compare selections-defined manually or algorithmically-in both the embedding and original spatial views, facilitating a deeper understanding of the spatial arrangement and morphological characteristics of entities of interest. To elucidate differences between selected sets of items, SEAL employs a scalable surrogate model to calculate feature importance scores, identifying the most influential features governing the position of objects within embeddings. These importance scores are visually summarized across selections, with mathematical set operations enabling detailed comparative analyses. We demonstrate SEAL's effectiveness and versatility through three case studies: colorectal cancer tissue analysis with a pharmacologist, melanoma investigation with a cell biologist, and exploration of sky survey data with an astronomer. These studies underscore the importance of integrating image context into embedding spaces when interpreting complex imaging datasets. Implemented as a standalone tool while also integrating seamlessly with computational notebooks, SEAL provides an interactive platform for spatially informed exploration of high-dimensional datasets, significantly enhancing interpretability and insight generation.

Visualization recommendation systems make data exploration less tedious by automating the process of visualization generation. They are particularly helpful for non-expert users who may not be familiar with a data set or the process of visualization specification. These systems allow users to input their preferences in the form of partial specifications to steer the recommendations made. However, the interaction approaches for partial specification input and their trade-offs have not been explored in prior work. In this article, we compare three different combinations of interaction approaches and granularities for users to indicate a preferred partial specification: 1) manual input, 2) inferring preferred partial specifications from binary like/dislike ratings for a visualization as a whole, or 3) inferring preferred partial specifications from binary like/dislike ratings for granular components of a visualization specification. In a between-subjects study, participants were assigned to one of three conditions and asked to complete a data exploration task. Our results indicate that manual input led to a greater coverage of data dimensions, while like/dislike ratings led to a greater diversity of marks and channels used. Qualitative participant feedback also reveals differences in user strategy and visualization comprehension across the three interaction conditions. Finally, we conclude with a discussion on implications for multiplicity and visualization comprehension during visual data exploration.

Intelligent tutoring systems leverage AI models of expert learning and student knowledge to deliver personalized tutoring to students. While these intelligent tutors have demonstrated improved student learning outcomes, it is still unclear how teachers might integrate them into curriculum and course planning to support responsive pedagogy. In this paper, we conducted a design study with five teachers who have deployed Apprentice Tutors, an intelligent tutoring platform, in their classes. We characterized their challenges around analyzing student interaction data from intelligent tutoring systems and built VisTA (Visualizations for Tutor Analytics), a visual analytics system that shows detailed provenance data across multiple coordinated views. We evaluated VisTA with the same five teachers, and found that the visualizations helped them better interpret intelligent tutor data, gain insights into student problem-solving provenance, and decide on necessary follow-up actions – such as providing students with further support or reviewing skills in the classroom. Finally, we discuss potential extensions of VisTA into sequence query and detection, as well as the potential for the visualizations to be useful for encouraging self-directed learning in students.

Visual augmentations are commonly added to charts and graphs in order to convey richer and more nuanced information about relationships in the data. However, many design spaces proposed for categorizing augmentations were defined in a top-down manner, based on expert heuristics or from surveys of published visualizations. Less well understood are user preferences and intuitions when designing augmentations. In this paper, we address the gap by conducting a design elicitation study, where study participants were asked to draw the different ways they would visually express the meaning of ten different prompts. We obtained 364 drawings from the study, and identified the emergent categories of augmentations used by participants. The contributions of this paper are: (i) a user-defined design space of visualization augmentations, (ii) a repository of hand drawn augmentations made by study participants, and (iii) a discussion of insights into participant considerations, and connections between our study and existing design guidelines.

Activists, governments, and academics regularly advocate for more open data. But how is data made open, and for whom is it made useful and usable? In this paper, we investigate and describe the work of making eviction data open to tenant organizers. We do this through an ethnographic description of ongoing work with a local housing activist organization. This work combines observation, direct participation in data work, and creating media artifacts, specifically digital maps. Our interpretation is grounded in D’Ignazio and Klein’s Data Feminism, emphasizing standpoint theory. Through our analysis and discussion, we highlight how shifting positionalities from data intermediaries to data accomplices affects the design of data sets and maps. We provide HCI scholars with three design implications when situating data for grassroots organizers: becoming a domain beginner, striving for data actionability, and evaluating our design artifacts by the social relations they sustain rather than just their technical efficacy.

Causal inference is a statistical paradigm for quantifying causal effects using observational data. It is a complex process, requiring multiple steps, iterations, and collaborations with domain experts. Analysts often rely on visualizations to evaluate the accuracy of each step. However, existing visualization toolkits are not designed to support the entire causal inference process within computational environments familiar to analysts. In this paper, we address this gap with Causalvis, a Python visualization package for causal inference. Working closely with causal inference experts, we adopted an iterative design process to develop four interactive visualization modules to support causal inference analysis tasks. The modules are then presented back to the experts for feedback and evaluation. We found that Causalvis effectively supported the iterative causal inference process. We discuss the implications of our findings for designing visualizations for causal inference, particularly for tasks of communication and collaboration.

Abstract Visual analytics systems integrate interactive visualizations and machine learning to enable expert users to solve complex analysis tasks. Applications combine techniques from various fields of research and are consequently not trivial to evaluate. The result is a lack of structure and comparability between evaluations. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive overview of evaluations in the field of human‐centered machine learning. We particularly focus on human‐related factors that influence trust, interpretability, and explainability. We analyze the evaluations presented in papers from top conferences and journals in information visualization and human‐computer interaction to provide a systematic review of their setup and findings. From this survey, we distill design dimensions for structured evaluations, identify evaluation gaps, and derive future research opportunities.