Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
J. C. S. Kadupitige
dblp:268/1473
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Cloud and datacenter computing · 87% High-performance computing · 13% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cloud and datacenter computing
resource management |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Modeling The Temporally Constrained Preemptions of Transient Cloud VMs · HPDC 2020 |
High-performance computing › scientific computing
scientific workload |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Modeling The Temporally Constrained Preemptions of Transient Cloud VMs · HPDC 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reliability theory · 0.4probability modeling · 0.4empirical study · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Modeling The Temporally Constrained Preemptions of Transient Cloud VMsabstractTransient cloud servers such as Amazon Spot instances, Google Preemptible VMs, and Azure Low-priority batch VMs, can reduce cloud computing costs by as much as 10x, but can be unilaterally preempted by the cloud provider. Understanding preemption characteristics (such as frequency) is a key first step in minimizing the effect of preemptions on application performance, availability, and cost. However, little is understood about temporally constrained preemptions---wherein preemptions must occur in a given time window. We study temporally constrained preemptions by conducting a large scale empirical study of Google's Preemptible VMs (that have a maximum lifetime of 24 hours), develop a new preemption probability model, new model-driven resource management policies, and implement them in a batch computing service for scientific computing workloads. Our statistical and experimental analysis indicates that temporally constrained preemptions are not uniformly distributed but are time-dependent and have a bathtub shape. We find that existing memoryless models and policies are not suitable for temporally constrained preemptions. We develop a new probability model for bathtub preemptions and analyze it through the lens of reliability theory. To highlight the effectiveness of our model, we develop optimized policies for job scheduling and checkpointing. Compared to existing techniques, our model-based policies can reduce the probability of job failure by more than 2x. We also implement our policies as part of a batch computing service for scientific computing applications, which reduces cost by 5x compared to conventional cloud deployments and keeps performance overheads under 3%. J. C. S. Kadupitige, Vikram Jadhao, Prateek Sharma 0001 |
HPDC | 1 |