Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Luisa Eck

dblp:268/6652 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 50% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › corruption robustness
common corruption robustness
0.412020
Improving robustness against common corruptions by covariate shift adaptation · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation › distribution adaptation
covariate shift adaptation
0.412020
Improving robustness against common corruptions by covariate shift adaptation · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.412020
Improving robustness against common corruptions by covariate shift adaptation · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
test-time adaptation
0.412020
Improving robustness against common corruptions by covariate shift adaptation · NeurIPS 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

unsupervised online adaptation · 0.4batch normalization statistics adaptation · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Improving robustness against common corruptions by covariate shift adaptation
abstract
Today’s state-of-the-art machine vision models are vulnerable to image corruptions like blurring or compression artefacts, limiting their performance in many real-world applications. We here argue that popular benchmarks to measure model robustness against common corruptions (like ImageNet-C) underestimate model robustness in many (but not all) application scenarios. The key insight is that in many scenarios, multiple unlabeled examples of the corruptions are available and can be used for unsupervised online adaptation. Replacing the activation statistics estimated by batch normalization on the training set with the statistics of the corrupted images consistently improves the robustness across 25 different popular computer vision models. Using the corrected statistics, ResNet-50 reaches 62.2% mCE on ImageNet-C compared to 76.7% without adaptation. With the more robust DeepAugment+AugMix model, we improve the state of the art achieved by a ResNet50 model up to date from 53.6% mCE to 45.4% mCE. Even adapting to a single sample improves robustness for the ResNet-50 and AugMix models, and 32 samples are sufficient to improve the current state of the art for a ResNet-50 architecture. We argue that results with adapted statistics should be included whenever reporting scores in corruption benchmarks and other out-of-distribution generalization settings.
Steffen Schneider 0001, Evgenia Rusak, Luisa Eck, Oliver Bringmann 0001, Wieland Brendel, Matthias Bethge
NeurIPS3