Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Brett W. Larsen

dblp:268/6684 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-8922-3918ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 49% Deep learning architectures and training · 25% Representation and self-supervised learning · 10%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › sparse training
lottery ticket hypothesis
1.222023
Unmasking the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: What's Encoded in a Winning Ticket's Mask? · ICLR 2023
Lottery Tickets on a Data Diet: Finding Initializations with Sparse Trainable Networks · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
pruning
1.222023
Unmasking the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: What's Encoded in a Winning Ticket's Mask? · ICLR 2023
Lottery Tickets on a Data Diet: Finding Initializations with Sparse Trainable Networks · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation analysis
representational similarity analysis
0.812024
Estimating Shape Distances on Neural Representations with Limited Samples · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical guarantees
0.812024
Estimating Shape Distances on Neural Representations with Limited Samples · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
0.712023
Unmasking the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: What's Encoded in a Winning Ticket's Mask? · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › pruning
iterative magnitude pruning
0.612022
Lottery Tickets on a Data Diet: Finding Initializations with Sparse Trainable Networks · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
loss landscape
0.612022
How many degrees of freedom do we need to train deep networks: a loss landscape perspective · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › loss landscape
loss landscape geometry
0.612022
Lottery Tickets on a Data Diet: Finding Initializations with Sparse Trainable Networks · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training dynamics
0.612022
Lottery Tickets on a Data Diet: Finding Initializations with Sparse Trainable Networks · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
sparse neural network
0.212023
Unmasking the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: What's Encoded in a Winning Ticket's Mask? · ICLR 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

method-of-moments estimation · 0.8bias-variance trade-off · 0.8linear mode connectivity · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Estimating Shape Distances on Neural Representations with Limited Samples
abstract
Measuring geometric similarity between high-dimensional network representations is a topic of longstanding interest to neuroscience and deep learning. Although many methods have been proposed, only a few works have rigorously analyzed their statistical efficiency or quantified estimator uncertainty in data-limited regimes. Here, we derive upper and lower bounds on the worst-case convergence of standard estimators of shape distance—a measure of representational dissimilarity proposed by Williams et al. (2021). These bounds reveal the challenging nature of the problem in high-dimensional feature spaces. To overcome these challenges, we introduce a novel method-of-moments estimator with a tunable bias-variance tradeoff parameterized by an upper bound on bias. We show that this estimator achieves superior performance to standard estimators in simulation and on neural data, particularly in high-dimensional settings. Our theoretical work and estimator thus respectively define and dramatically expand the scope of neural data for which geometric similarity can be accurately measured.
Dean A. Pospisil, Brett W. Larsen, Sarah E. Harvey, Alex H. Williams
ICLR2
2023 Unmasking the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: What's Encoded in a Winning Ticket's Mask?
Mansheej Paul, Feng Chen 0046, Brett W. Larsen, Jonathan Frankle, Surya Ganguli, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite
ICLR3
2022 How many degrees of freedom do we need to train deep networks: a loss landscape perspective
Brett W. Larsen, Stanislav Fort, Nic Becker, Surya Ganguli
ICLR1
2022 Lottery Tickets on a Data Diet: Finding Initializations with Sparse Trainable Networks
abstract
A striking observation about iterative magnitude pruning (IMP; Frankle et al. 2020) is that—after just a few hundred steps of dense training—the method can find a sparse sub-network that can be trained to the same accuracy as the dense network. However, the same does not hold at step 0, i.e. random initialization. In this work, we seek to understand how this early phase of pre-training leads to a good initialization for IMP both through the lens of the data distribution and the loss landscape geometry. Empirically we observe that, holding the number of pre-training iterations constant, training on a small fraction of (randomly chosen) data suffices to obtain an equally good initialization for IMP. We additionally observe that by pre-training only on "easy" training data, we can decrease the number of steps necessary to find a good initialization for IMP compared to training on the full dataset or a randomly chosen subset. Finally, we identify novel properties of the loss landscape of dense networks that are predictive of IMP performance, showing in particular that more examples being linearly mode connected in the dense network correlates well with good initializations for IMP. Combined, these results provide new insight into the role played by the early phase training in IMP.
Mansheej Paul, Brett W. Larsen, Surya Ganguli, Jonathan Frankle, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite
NeurIPS2
2022 Towards a more general understanding of the algorithmic utility of recurrent connections
abstract
Lateral and recurrent connections are ubiquitous in biological neural circuits. Yet while the strong computational abilities of feedforward networks have been extensively studied, our understanding of the role and advantages of recurrent computations that might explain their prevalence remains an important open challenge. Foundational studies by Minsky and Roelfsema argued that computations that require propagation of global information for local computation to take place would particularly benefit from the sequential, parallel nature of processing in recurrent networks. Such "tag propagation" algorithms perform repeated, local propagation of information and were originally introduced in the context of detecting connectedness, a task that is challenging for feedforward networks. Here, we advance the understanding of the utility of lateral and recurrent computation by first performing a large-scale empirical study of neural architectures for the computation of connectedness to explore feedforward solutions more fully and establish robustly the importance of recurrent architectures. In addition, we highlight a tradeoff between computation time and performance and construct hybrid feedforward/recurrent models that perform well even in the presence of varying computational time limitations. We then generalize tag propagation architectures to propagating multiple interacting tags and demonstrate that these are efficient computational substrates for more general computations of connectedness by introducing and solving an abstracted biologically inspired decision-making task. Our work thus clarifies and expands the set of computational tasks that can be solved efficiently by recurrent computation, yielding hypotheses for structure in population activity that may be present in such tasks.
Brett W. Larsen, Shaul Druckmann
PLoS Comput. Biol.1