Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Akriti Jain 0001

dblp:268/7702-1 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 54% Multi-agent systems · 46%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
document understanding
1.222026
Doc2Chart: Intent-Driven Zero-Shot Chart Generation from Documents · EMNLP 2025
Decisive: Guiding User Decisions with Optimal Preference Elicitation from Unstructured Documents · ACL (1) 2026
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › social choice › computational social choice
preference elicitation
1.012026
Decisive: Guiding User Decisions with Optimal Preference Elicitation from Unstructured Documents · ACL (1) 2026
Visualization and visual analytics › visualization generation › automated visualization generation
chart generation
0.912025
Doc2Chart: Intent-Driven Zero-Shot Chart Generation from Documents · EMNLP 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

retrieval-augmented generation · 1.7large language model · 1.7unstructured documents · 1.0preference elicitation · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Decisive: Guiding User Decisions with Optimal Preference Elicitation from Unstructured Documents
abstract
Akriti Jain, Anish Mulay, Divyansh Verma, Aishani Pandey, Pritika Ramu, Aparna Garimella. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.
Akriti Jain 0001, Anish Mulay, Divyansh Verma, Aishani Pandey, Pritika Ramu, Aparna Garimella
ACL (1)1
2025 Doc2Chart: Intent-Driven Zero-Shot Chart Generation from Documents
abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in transforming text descriptions or tables to data visualizations via instruction-tuning methods.However, it is not straightforward to apply these methods directly for a more real-world use case of visualizing data from long documents based on user-given intents, as opposed to the user pre-selecting the relevant content manually.We introduce the task of intent-based chart generation from documents: given a user-specified intent and document(s), the goal is to generate a chart adhering to the intent and grounded on the document(s) in a zero-shot setting.We propose an unsupervised, two-staged framework in which an LLM first extracts relevant information from the document(s) by decomposing the intent and iteratively validates and refines this data.Next, a heuristic-guided module selects an appropriate chart type before final code generation.To assess the data accuracy of the generated charts, we propose an attribution-based metric that uses a structured textual representation of charts, instead of relying on visual decoding metrics that often fail to capture the chart data effectively.To validate our approach, we curate a dataset comprising of 1,242 tuples from two domains, finance and scientific, in contrast to the existing datasets that are largely limited to parallel text descriptions/ tables and their corresponding charts.We compare our approach with baselines using single-shot chart generation using LLMs and query-based retrieval methods; our method outperforms by upto 9 points and 17 points in terms of chart data accuracy and chart type respectively over the best baselines.
Akriti Jain 0001, Pritika Ramu, Aparna Garimella, Apoorv Saxena
EMNLP1