VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Philipp Liznerski
dblp:268/8258
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 76% Vision and language · 18% Time series and sequential data · 7% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
2.3 | 3 | 2026 | Reimagining Anomalies: What If Anomalies Were Normal? · AAAI 2026 Interpretable Tensor Fusion · IJCAI 2024 Explainable Deep One-Class Classification · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explainable AI
anomaly explanation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Reimagining Anomalies: What If Anomalies Were Normal? · AAAI 2026 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal fusion
tensor fusion |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Interpretable Tensor Fusion · IJCAI 2024 |
Data mining
anomaly detection |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Explainable Deep One-Class Classification · ICLR 2021 |
Data mining › anomaly detection
one-class classification |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Explainable Deep One-Class Classification · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › anomaly detection
visual anomaly detection |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Reimagining Anomalies: What If Anomalies Were Normal? · AAAI 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
deep one-class classification · 1.0deep anomaly detection · 1.0counterfactual generation · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Reimagining Anomalies: What If Anomalies Were Normal?abstractDeep learning-based methods have achieved a breakthrough in image anomaly detection, but their complexity introduces a considerable challenge to understanding why an instance is predicted to be anomalous. We introduce a novel explanation method that generates multiple alternative modifications for each anomaly, capturing diverse concepts of anomalousness. Each modification is trained to be perceived as normal by the anomaly detector. The method provides a semantic explanation of the mechanism that triggered the detector, allowing users to explore ``what-if scenarios.'' Qualitative and quantitative analyses across various image datasets demonstrate that applying this method to state-of-the-art detectors provides high-quality semantic explanations. Philipp Liznerski, Saurabh Varshneya, Ece Calikus, Puyu Wang, Alexander Bartscher, Sebastian J. Vollmer, Sophie Fellenz, Marius Kloft |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2024 | Non-vacuous Generalization Bounds for Adversarial Risk in Stochastic Neural NetworksabstractAdversarial examples are manipulated samples used to deceive machine learning models, posing a serious threat in safety-critical applications. Existing safety certificates for machine learning models are limited to individual input examples, failing to capture generalization to unseen data. To address this limitation, we propose novel generalization bounds based on the PAC-Bayesian and randomized smoothing frameworks, providing certificates that predict the model’s performance and robustness on unseen test samples based solely on the training data. We present an effective procedure to train and compute the first non-vacuous generalization bounds for neural networks in adversarial settings. Experimental results on the widely recognized MNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets demonstrate the efficacy of our approach, yielding the first robust risk certificates for stochastic convolutional neural networks under the $L_2$ threat model. Our method offers valuable tools for evaluating model susceptibility to real-world adversarial risks. Waleed Mustafa, Philipp Liznerski, Antoine Ledent, Dennis Wagner, Puyu Wang, Marius Kloft |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2024 | Interpretable Tensor Fusion
Saurabh Varshneya, Antoine Ledent, Philipp Liznerski, Andriy Balinskyy, Purvanshi Mehta, Waleed Mustafa, Marius Kloft |
IJCAI | 3 |
| 2021 | Explainable Deep One-Class Classification
Philipp Liznerski, Lukas Ruff, Robert A. Vandermeulen, Billy Joe Franks, Marius Kloft, Klaus-Robert Müller |
ICLR | 1 |