Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Philipp Liznerski

dblp:268/8258 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 76% Vision and language · 18% Time series and sequential data · 7%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
2.332026
Reimagining Anomalies: What If Anomalies Were Normal? · AAAI 2026
Interpretable Tensor Fusion · IJCAI 2024
Explainable Deep One-Class Classification · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explainable AI
anomaly explanation
1.012026
Reimagining Anomalies: What If Anomalies Were Normal? · AAAI 2026
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal fusion
tensor fusion
0.812024
Interpretable Tensor Fusion · IJCAI 2024
Data mining
anomaly detection
0.512021
Explainable Deep One-Class Classification · ICLR 2021
Data mining › anomaly detection
one-class classification
0.512021
Explainable Deep One-Class Classification · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › anomaly detection
visual anomaly detection
0.312026
Reimagining Anomalies: What If Anomalies Were Normal? · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

deep one-class classification · 1.0deep anomaly detection · 1.0counterfactual generation · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Reimagining Anomalies: What If Anomalies Were Normal?
abstract
Deep learning-based methods have achieved a breakthrough in image anomaly detection, but their complexity introduces a considerable challenge to understanding why an instance is predicted to be anomalous. We introduce a novel explanation method that generates multiple alternative modifications for each anomaly, capturing diverse concepts of anomalousness. Each modification is trained to be perceived as normal by the anomaly detector. The method provides a semantic explanation of the mechanism that triggered the detector, allowing users to explore ``what-if scenarios.'' Qualitative and quantitative analyses across various image datasets demonstrate that applying this method to state-of-the-art detectors provides high-quality semantic explanations.
Philipp Liznerski, Saurabh Varshneya, Ece Calikus, Puyu Wang, Alexander Bartscher, Sebastian J. Vollmer, Sophie Fellenz, Marius Kloft
AAAI1
2024 Non-vacuous Generalization Bounds for Adversarial Risk in Stochastic Neural Networks
abstract
Adversarial examples are manipulated samples used to deceive machine learning models, posing a serious threat in safety-critical applications. Existing safety certificates for machine learning models are limited to individual input examples, failing to capture generalization to unseen data. To address this limitation, we propose novel generalization bounds based on the PAC-Bayesian and randomized smoothing frameworks, providing certificates that predict the model’s performance and robustness on unseen test samples based solely on the training data. We present an effective procedure to train and compute the first non-vacuous generalization bounds for neural networks in adversarial settings. Experimental results on the widely recognized MNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets demonstrate the efficacy of our approach, yielding the first robust risk certificates for stochastic convolutional neural networks under the $L_2$ threat model. Our method offers valuable tools for evaluating model susceptibility to real-world adversarial risks.
Waleed Mustafa, Philipp Liznerski, Antoine Ledent, Dennis Wagner, Puyu Wang, Marius Kloft
AISTATS2
2024 Interpretable Tensor Fusion
Saurabh Varshneya, Antoine Ledent, Philipp Liznerski, Andriy Balinskyy, Purvanshi Mehta, Waleed Mustafa, Marius Kloft
IJCAI3
2021 Explainable Deep One-Class Classification
Philipp Liznerski, Lukas Ruff, Robert A. Vandermeulen, Billy Joe Franks, Marius Kloft, Klaus-Robert Müller
ICLR1