VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Robert Brand
dblp:268/8261
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
3D vision · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision › physical simulation
differentiable physics |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Solver-in-the-Loop: Learning from Differentiable Physics to Interact with Iterative PDE-Solvers · NeurIPS 2020 |
Computational science and engineering
numerical simulation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Solver-in-the-Loop: Learning from Differentiable Physics to Interact with Iterative PDE-Solvers · NeurIPS 2020 |
Computational science and engineering
partial differential equation solver |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Solver-in-the-Loop: Learning from Differentiable Physics to Interact with Iterative PDE-Solvers · NeurIPS 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
recurrent rollout · 0.9differentiable physics · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Solver-in-the-Loop: Learning from Differentiable Physics to Interact with Iterative PDE-SolversabstractFinding accurate solutions to partial differential equations (PDEs) is a crucial task in all scientific and engineering disciplines. It has recently been shown that machine learning methods can improve the solution accuracy by correcting for effects not captured by the discretized PDE. We target the problem of reducing numerical errors of iterative PDE solvers and compare different learning approaches for finding complex correction functions. We find that previously used learning approaches are significantly outperformed by methods that integrate the solver into the training loop and thereby allow the model to interact with the PDE during training. This provides the model with realistic input distributions that take previous corrections into account, yielding improvements in accuracy with stable rollouts of several hundred recurrent evaluation steps and surpassing even tailored supervised variants. We highlight the performance of the differentiable physics networks for a wide variety of PDEs, from non-linear advection-diffusion systems to three-dimensional Navier-Stokes flows. Kiwon Um, Robert Brand, Yun Fei, Philipp Holl, Nils Thürey |
NeurIPS | 2 |