Robert Brand

dblp:268/8261 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational science and engineering · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision › physical simulation
differentiable physics
0.412020
Solver-in-the-Loop: Learning from Differentiable Physics to Interact with Iterative PDE-Solvers · NeurIPS 2020
Computational science and engineering
numerical simulation
0.412020
Solver-in-the-Loop: Learning from Differentiable Physics to Interact with Iterative PDE-Solvers · NeurIPS 2020
Computational science and engineering
partial differential equation solver
0.412020
Solver-in-the-Loop: Learning from Differentiable Physics to Interact with Iterative PDE-Solvers · NeurIPS 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

recurrent rollout · 0.9differentiable physics · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Solver-in-the-Loop: Learning from Differentiable Physics to Interact with Iterative PDE-Solvers
abstract
Finding accurate solutions to partial differential equations (PDEs) is a crucial task in all scientific and engineering disciplines. It has recently been shown that machine learning methods can improve the solution accuracy by correcting for effects not captured by the discretized PDE. We target the problem of reducing numerical errors of iterative PDE solvers and compare different learning approaches for finding complex correction functions. We find that previously used learning approaches are significantly outperformed by methods that integrate the solver into the training loop and thereby allow the model to interact with the PDE during training. This provides the model with realistic input distributions that take previous corrections into account, yielding improvements in accuracy with stable rollouts of several hundred recurrent evaluation steps and surpassing even tailored supervised variants. We highlight the performance of the differentiable physics networks for a wide variety of PDEs, from non-linear advection-diffusion systems to three-dimensional Navier-Stokes flows.
Kiwon Um, Robert Brand, Yun Fei, Philipp Holl, Nils Thürey
NeurIPS2