Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mukta G. Palshikar

dblp:269/0801 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-1179-7903ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › systems bioinformatics
pathway analysis
0.612022
WikiNetworks: translating manually created biological pathways for topological analysis · Bioinform. 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology › systems bioinformatics
pathway model curation
0.212022
WikiNetworks: translating manually created biological pathways for topological analysis · Bioinform. 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

network construction · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 WikiNetworks: translating manually created biological pathways for topological analysis
abstract
SUMMARY: WikiPathways is a database of 2979 biological pathways across 31 species created using the drawing software PathVisio. Many of these pathways are not directly usable for network-based topological analyses due to differences in curation styles and drawings. We developed the WikiNetworks package to standardize and construct directed networks by combining geometric information and manual annotations from WikiPathways. WikiNetworks performs significantly better than existing tools. This enables the use of high-quality WikiPathways resource for network-based topological analysis of high-throughput data. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: WikiNetworks is written in Python3 and is available on github.com/Thakar-Lab/wikinetworks and on PyPI. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Mukta G. Palshikar, Shannon P. Hilchey, Martin S. Zand, Juilee Thakar
Bioinform.1
2019 Executable pathway analysis using ensemble discrete-state modeling for large-scale data
abstract
Pathway analysis is widely used to gain mechanistic insights from high-throughput omics data. However, most existing methods do not consider signal integration represented by pathway topology, resulting in enrichment of convergent pathways when downstream genes are modulated. Incorporation of signal flow and integration in pathway analysis could rank the pathways based on modulation in key regulatory genes. This implementation can be facilitated for large-scale data by discrete state network modeling due to simplicity in parameterization. Here, we model cellular heterogeneity using discrete state dynamics and measure pathway activities in cross-sectional data. We introduce a new algorithm, Boolean Omics Network Invariant-Time Analysis (BONITA), for signal propagation, signal integration, and pathway analysis. Our signal propagation approach models heterogeneity in transcriptomic data as arising from intercellular heterogeneity rather than intracellular stochasticity, and propagates binary signals repeatedly across networks. Logic rules defining signal integration are inferred by genetic algorithm and are refined by local search. The rules determine the impact of each node in a pathway, which is used to score the probability of the pathway's modulation by chance. We have comprehensively tested BONITA for application to transcriptomics data from translational studies. Comparison with state-of-the-art pathway analysis methods shows that BONITA has higher sensitivity at lower levels of source node modulation and similar sensitivity at higher levels of source node modulation. Application of BONITA pathway analysis to previously validated RNA-sequencing studies identifies additional relevant pathways in in-vitro human cell line experiments and in-vivo infant studies. Additionally, BONITA successfully detected modulation of disease specific pathways when comparing relevant RNA-sequencing data with healthy controls. Most interestingly, the two highest impact score nodes identified by BONITA included known drug targets. Thus, BONITA is a powerful approach to prioritize not only pathways but also specific mechanistic role of genes compared to existing methods. BONITA is available at: https://github.com/thakar-lab/BONITA.
Rohith Palli, Mukta G. Palshikar, Juilee Thakar
PLoS Comput. Biol.2