Simon Valentin

dblp:269/1916 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
5as first author
5since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-2039-8928ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 7 · 5 first-author · 5 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 4 first-author · 5 since 2021
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Paradoxical parsimony: How latent complexity favors theory simplicity
Tianwei Gong, Simon Valentin, Christopher G. Lucas, Neil Bramley
CogSci2
2024 Distinguishing Between Process Models of Causal Learning
Simon Valentin, Lucas Castillo, Adam Sanborn, Christopher G. Lucas
CogSci1
2021 Know your network: Sensitivity to structure in social learning
Jan-Philipp Fränken, Simon Valentin, Christopher G. Lucas, Neil Bramley
CogSci2
2021 Bayesian Experimental Design for Intractable Models of Cognition
Simon Valentin, Steven Kleinegesse, Neil Bramley, Michael U. Gutmann, Christopher G. Lucas
CogSci1
2021 Symbolic and Sub-Symbolic Systems in People and Machines
Simon Valentin, Bonan Zhao 0001, Chentian Jiang, Neil Bramley, Christopher G. Lucas
CogSci1
2020 Learning Hidden Causal Structure from Temporal Data
Simon Valentin, Neil Bramley, Christopher G. Lucas
CogSci1
2020 Interpreting neural decoding models using grouped model reliance
abstract
Machine learning algorithms are becoming increasingly popular for decoding psychological constructs based on neural data. However, as a step towards bridging the gap between theory-driven cognitive neuroscience and data-driven decoding approaches, there is a need for methods that allow to interpret trained decoding models. The present study demonstrates grouped model reliance as a model-agnostic permutation-based approach to this problem. Grouped model reliance indicates the extent to which a trained model relies on conceptually related groups of variables, such as frequency bands or regions of interest in electroencephalographic (EEG) data. As a case study to demonstrate the method, random forest and support vector machine models were trained on within-participant single-trial EEG data from a Sternberg working memory task. Participants were asked to memorize a sequence of digits (0-9), varying randomly in length between one, four and seven digits, where EEG recordings for working memory load estimation were taken from a 3-second retention interval. The present results confirm previous findings insofar as both random forest and support vector machine models relied on alpha-band activity in most subjects. However, as revealed by further analyses, patterns in frequency and topography varied considerably between individuals, pointing to more pronounced inter-individual differences than previously reported.
Simon Valentin, Maximilian Harkotte, Tzvetan Popov
PLoS Comput. Biol.1