Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yueyang Zhong
dblp:269/4489
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational finance and economics · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-free reinforcement learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Data-Driven Market-Making via Model-Free Learning · IJCAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › value-based reinforcement learning
q-learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Data-Driven Market-Making via Model-Free Learning · IJCAI 2020 |
Computational finance and economics
algorithmic trading |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Data-Driven Market-Making via Model-Free Learning · IJCAI 2020 |
Computational finance and economics › market microstructure
market making |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Data-Driven Market-Making via Model-Free Learning · IJCAI 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
state aggregation · 0.9q-learning · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Data-Driven Market-Making via Model-Free LearningabstractThis paper studies when a market-making firm should place orders to maximize their expected net profit, while also constraining risk, assuming orders are maintained on an electronic limit order book (LOB). To do this, we use a model-free and off-policy method, Q-learning, coupled with state aggregation, to develop a proposed trading strategy that can be implemented using a simple lookup table. Our main training dataset is derived from event-by-event data recording the state of the LOB. Our proposed trading strategy has passed both in-sample and out-of-sample testing in the backtester of the market-making firm with whom we are collaborating, and it also outperforms other benchmark strategies. As a result, the firm desires to put the strategy into production. Yueyang Zhong, YeeMan Bergstrom, Amy R. Ward |
IJCAI | 1 |