Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yueyang Zhong

dblp:269/4489 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational finance and economics · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-free reinforcement learning
0.412020
Data-Driven Market-Making via Model-Free Learning · IJCAI 2020
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › value-based reinforcement learning
q-learning
0.412020
Data-Driven Market-Making via Model-Free Learning · IJCAI 2020
Computational finance and economics
algorithmic trading
0.412020
Data-Driven Market-Making via Model-Free Learning · IJCAI 2020
Computational finance and economics › market microstructure
market making
0.412020
Data-Driven Market-Making via Model-Free Learning · IJCAI 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

state aggregation · 0.9q-learning · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Data-Driven Market-Making via Model-Free Learning
abstract
This paper studies when a market-making firm should place orders to maximize their expected net profit, while also constraining risk, assuming orders are maintained on an electronic limit order book (LOB). To do this, we use a model-free and off-policy method, Q-learning, coupled with state aggregation, to develop a proposed trading strategy that can be implemented using a simple lookup table. Our main training dataset is derived from event-by-event data recording the state of the LOB. Our proposed trading strategy has passed both in-sample and out-of-sample testing in the backtester of the market-making firm with whom we are collaborating, and it also outperforms other benchmark strategies. As a result, the firm desires to put the strategy into production.
Yueyang Zhong, YeeMan Bergstrom, Amy R. Ward
IJCAI1