Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Anirudh Thatipelli
dblp:269/9685
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-6859-6416ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Video understanding and tracking · 85% 3D vision · 9% Representation and self-supervised learning · 5% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
action recognition |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Spatio-temporal Relation Modeling for Few-shot Action Recognition · CVPR 2022 Quo Vadis, Skeleton Action Recognition? · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2021 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › action recognition
few-shot action recognition |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Spatio-temporal Relation Modeling for Few-shot Action Recognition · CVPR 2022 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › spatio-temporal modeling
spatio-temporal relation modeling |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Spatio-temporal Relation Modeling for Few-shot Action Recognition · CVPR 2022 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › action recognition
skeleton-based action recognition |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Quo Vadis, Skeleton Action Recognition? · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2021 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
pose estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Quo Vadis, Skeleton Action Recognition? · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2021 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d shape representation
skeleton representation |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Quo Vadis, Skeleton Action Recognition? · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
relational matching · 0.6metric learning · 0.6survey · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Egocentric and exocentric methods: A short survey
Anirudh Thatipelli, Shao-Yuan Lo, Amit K. Roy-Chowdhury |
Comput. Vis. Image Underst. | 1 |
| 2022 | Spatio-temporal Relation Modeling for Few-shot Action RecognitionabstractWe propose a novel few-shot action recognition framework, STRM, which enhances class-specific feature discrim-inability while simultaneously learning higher-order temporal representations. The focus of our approach is a novel spatio-temporal enrichment module that aggregates spatial and temporal contexts with dedicated local patch-level and global frame-level feature enrichment sub-modules. Local patch-level enrichment captures the appearance-based characteristics of actions. On the other hand, global framelevel enrichment explicitly encodes the broad temporal context, thereby capturing the relevant object features over time. The resulting spatio-temporally enriched representations are then utilized to learn the relational matching between query and support action sub-sequences. We further introduce a query-class similarity classifier on the patch-level enriched features to enhance class-specific feature dis-criminability by reinforcing the feature learning at different stages in the proposed framework. Experiments are performed on four few-shot action recognition benchmarks: Kinetics, SSv2, HMDB51 and UCF101. Our extensive ablation study reveals the benefits of the proposed contributions. Furthermore, our approach sets a new state-of-the-art on all four benchmarks. On the challenging SSv2 benchmark, our approach achieves an absolute gain of 3.5% in classification accuracy, as compared to the best existing method in the literature. Our code and models are available at https://github.com/Anirudh257/strm. Anirudh Thatipelli, Sanath Narayan, Salman Khan 0001, Rao Muhammad Anwer, Fahad Shahbaz Khan, Bernard Ghanem |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2021 | Quo Vadis, Skeleton Action Recognition?
Pranay Gupta, Anirudh Thatipelli, Aditya Aggarwal, Shubh Maheshwari, Neel Trivedi, Ravi Kiran Sarvadevabhatla |
Int. J. Comput. Vis. | 2 |