Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Jonathan E. Taylor

dblp:27/10733 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
4 papers
Mathematical optimization · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Learning theory · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization
selective inference
0.422015
Evaluating the statistical significance of biclusters · NIPS 2015
Exact Post Model Selection Inference for Marginal Screening · NIPS 2014
Mathematical optimization › statistical learning theory
high-dimensional regression
0.312017
Communication-efficient Sparse Regression · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017
Mathematical optimization
statistical learning theory
0.312017
Communication-efficient Sparse Regression · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017
Data mining › clustering
co-clustering
0.212015
Evaluating the statistical significance of biclusters · NIPS 2015
Mathematical optimization › selective inference
post-selection inference
0.212014
Exact Post Model Selection Inference for Marginal Screening · NIPS 2014
Machine learning › Learning theory › model selection
consistent model selection
0.212013
On model selection consistency of penalized M-estimators: a geometric theory · NIPS 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

selective inference · 0.4p-values · 0.4confidence intervals · 0.4irrepresentability · 0.3geometric decomposability · 0.3generalized linear model · 0.3debiased lasso · 0.3approximate inverse covariance · 0.3post-selection inference · 0.2marginal screening · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Communication-efficient Sparse Regression
abstract
We devise a communication-efficient approach to distributed sparse regression in the high-dimensional setting. The key idea is to average debiased or desparsified lasso estimators. We show the approach converges at the same rate as the lasso as long as the dataset is not split across too many machines, and consistently estimates the support under weaker conditions than the lasso. On the computational side, we propose a new parallel and computationally-efficient algorithm to compute the approximate inverse covariance required in the debiasing approach, when the dataset is split across samples. We further extend the approach to generalized linear models.
Jason D. Lee, Qiang Liu 0001, Yuekai Sun, Jonathan E. Taylor
J. Mach. Learn. Res.4
2015 Evaluating the statistical significance of biclusters
abstract
Biclustering (also known as submatrix localization) is a problem of high practical relevance in exploratory analysis of high-dimensional data. We develop a framework for performing statistical inference on biclusters found by score-based algorithms. Since the bicluster was selected in a data dependent manner by a biclustering or localization algorithm, this is a form of selective inference. Our framework gives exact (non-asymptotic) confidence intervals and p-values for the significance of the selected biclusters. Further, we generalize our approach to obtain exact inference for Gaussian statistics.
Jason D. Lee, Yuekai Sun, Jonathan E. Taylor
NIPS3
2014 Exact Post Model Selection Inference for Marginal Screening
Jason D. Lee, Jonathan E. Taylor
NIPS2
2013 On model selection consistency of penalized M-estimators: a geometric theory
abstract
Penalized M-estimators are used in diverse areas of science and engineering to fit high-dimensional models with some low-dimensional structure. Often, the penalties are \emph{geometrically decomposable}, \ie\ can be expressed as a sum of (convex) support functions. We generalize the notion of irrepresentable to geometrically decomposable penalties and develop a general framework for establishing consistency and model selection consistency of M-estimators with such penalties. We then use this framework to derive results for some special cases of interest in bioinformatics and statistical learning.
Jason D. Lee, Yuekai Sun, Jonathan E. Taylor
NIPS3