VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jonathan E. Taylor
dblp:27/10733
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
4 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning theory · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization
selective inference |
0.4 | 2 | 2015 | Evaluating the statistical significance of biclusters · NIPS 2015 Exact Post Model Selection Inference for Marginal Screening · NIPS 2014 |
Mathematical optimization › statistical learning theory
high-dimensional regression |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Communication-efficient Sparse Regression · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Mathematical optimization
statistical learning theory |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Communication-efficient Sparse Regression · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Data mining › clustering
co-clustering |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Evaluating the statistical significance of biclusters · NIPS 2015 |
Mathematical optimization › selective inference
post-selection inference |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Exact Post Model Selection Inference for Marginal Screening · NIPS 2014 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › model selection
consistent model selection |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | On model selection consistency of penalized M-estimators: a geometric theory · NIPS 2013 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
selective inference · 0.4p-values · 0.4confidence intervals · 0.4irrepresentability · 0.3geometric decomposability · 0.3generalized linear model · 0.3debiased lasso · 0.3approximate inverse covariance · 0.3post-selection inference · 0.2marginal screening · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Communication-efficient Sparse RegressionabstractWe devise a communication-efficient approach to distributed sparse regression in the high-dimensional setting. The key idea is to average debiased or desparsified lasso estimators. We show the approach converges at the same rate as the lasso as long as the dataset is not split across too many machines, and consistently estimates the support under weaker conditions than the lasso. On the computational side, we propose a new parallel and computationally-efficient algorithm to compute the approximate inverse covariance required in the debiasing approach, when the dataset is split across samples. We further extend the approach to generalized linear models. Jason D. Lee, Qiang Liu 0001, Yuekai Sun, Jonathan E. Taylor |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 4 |
| 2015 | Evaluating the statistical significance of biclustersabstractBiclustering (also known as submatrix localization) is a problem of high practical relevance in exploratory analysis of high-dimensional data. We develop a framework for performing statistical inference on biclusters found by score-based algorithms. Since the bicluster was selected in a data dependent manner by a biclustering or localization algorithm, this is a form of selective inference. Our framework gives exact (non-asymptotic) confidence intervals and p-values for the significance of the selected biclusters. Further, we generalize our approach to obtain exact inference for Gaussian statistics. Jason D. Lee, Yuekai Sun, Jonathan E. Taylor |
NIPS | 3 |
| 2014 | Exact Post Model Selection Inference for Marginal Screening
Jason D. Lee, Jonathan E. Taylor |
NIPS | 2 |
| 2013 | On model selection consistency of penalized M-estimators: a geometric theoryabstractPenalized M-estimators are used in diverse areas of science and engineering to fit high-dimensional models with some low-dimensional structure. Often, the penalties are \emph{geometrically decomposable}, \ie\ can be expressed as a sum of (convex) support functions. We generalize the notion of irrepresentable to geometrically decomposable penalties and develop a general framework for establishing consistency and model selection consistency of M-estimators with such penalties. We then use this framework to derive results for some special cases of interest in bioinformatics and statistical learning. Jason D. Lee, Yuekai Sun, Jonathan E. Taylor |
NIPS | 3 |