Brandon A. Mayer

dblp:27/11261 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0009-0006-7814-8576ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Performance modeling and evaluation · 74% Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 13% High-performance computing · 13%
Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Graph learning · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Graph learning
network embedding
0.712023
HUGE: Huge Unsupervised Graph Embeddings with TPUs · KDD 2023
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
graph neural network evaluation
0.612022
GraphWorld: Fake Graphs Bring Real Insights for GNNs · KDD 2022
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking
0.612022
GraphWorld: Fake Graphs Bring Real Insights for GNNs · KDD 2022
Performance modeling and evaluation
synthetic graph generation
0.612022
GraphWorld: Fake Graphs Bring Real Insights for GNNs · KDD 2022
High-performance computing
large-scale graph processing
0.212023
HUGE: Huge Unsupervised Graph Embeddings with TPUs · KDD 2023
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
machine learning accelerator
0.212023
HUGE: Huge Unsupervised Graph Embeddings with TPUs · KDD 2023
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › auction theory
bidding strategy
0.212013
Accounting for price dependencies in simultaneous sealed-bid auctions · EC 2013
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › auction theory › multi-item auctions
simultaneous auctions
0.212013
Accounting for price dependencies in simultaneous sealed-bid auctions · EC 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

tensor processing unit · 1.3high-bandwidth memory · 1.3joint price distribution prediction · 0.3heuristic bidding · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 HUGE: Huge Unsupervised Graph Embeddings with TPUs
abstract
Graphs are a representation of structured data that captures the relationships between sets of objects. With the ubiquity of available network data, there is increasing industrial and academic need to quickly analyze graphs with billions of nodes and trillions of edges. A common first step for network understanding is Graph Embedding, the process of creating a continuous representation of nodes in a graph. A continuous representation is often more amenable, especially at scale, for solving downstream machine learning tasks such as classification, link prediction, and clustering. A high-performance graph embedding architecture leveraging Tensor Processing Units (TPUs) with configurable amounts of high-bandwidth memory is presented that simplifies the graph embedding problem and can scale to graphs with billions of nodes and trillions of edges. We verify the embedding space quality on real and synthetic large-scale datasets.
Brandon A. Mayer, Anton Tsitsulin, Hendrik Fichtenberger, Jonathan Halcrow, Bryan Perozzi
KDD1
2022 GraphWorld: Fake Graphs Bring Real Insights for GNNs
abstract
Despite advances in the field of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), only a small number (~5) of datasets are currently used to evaluate new models. This continued reliance on a handful of datasets provides minimal insight into the performance differences between models, and is especially challenging for industrial practitioners who are likely to have datasets which are very different from academic benchmarks. In the course of our work on GNN infrastructure and open-source software at Google, we have sought to develop benchmarks that are robust, tunable, scalable, and generalizable.
John Palowitch, Anton Tsitsulin, Brandon A. Mayer, Bryan Perozzi
KDD3
2014 Duration Dependent Codebooks for Change Detection
Brandon A. Mayer, Joseph L. Mundy
BMVC1
2013 Accounting for price dependencies in simultaneous sealed-bid auctions
abstract
Current autonomous bidding strategies for complex auctions typically employ a two phased architecture: first, the agent predicts a distribution over good prices, and then the agent generates bids given those predictions, usually using a heuristic. For computational reasons, previous state-of-the-art methods assumed prices were independent across goods, and then bid based on marginal price distributions. However, prices for goods are typically dependent, especially for complements and substitutes. We examine and bound the potential error from bidding with respect to marginal price distributions when good prices are in fact correlated. Then, to mitigate this error, we develop computationally feasible methods for predicting joint price distributions, and employing such predictions in bidding strategies. We also demonstrate experimentally that the state-of-the-art heuristic for bidding in simultaneous second-price sealed-bid auctions is outdone by the analog of this same heuristic bidding with respect to joint instead of marginal price predictions.
Brandon A. Mayer, Eric Sodomka, Amy Greenwald, Michael P. Wellman
EC1
2012 Object Recognition in Probabilistic 3-d Volumetric Scenes
Maria I. Restrepo 0002, Brandon A. Mayer, Joseph L. Mundy
ICPRAM (2)2