VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Abhishek Singh 0001
dblp:27/2328-1
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
7as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 10 · 7 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Electronic design automation · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › VLSI testing
defect-based testing |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Power supply transient signal analysis for defect-oriented test · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2003 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
delay fault testing |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Power supply transient signal analysis for defect-oriented test · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2003 |
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Power supply transient signal analysis for defect-oriented test · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2003 |
Electronic design automation › hardware test
defect detection |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Power supply transient signal analysis for defect-oriented test · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2003 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
linear regression analysis · 0.0cross-correlation analysis · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | Defect Simulation Methodology for iDDT Testing
Abhishek Singh 0001, James F. Plusquellic, Dhananjay S. Phatak, Chintan Patel |
J. Electron. Test. | 1 |
| 2005 | Defect Detection Using Quiescent Signal Analysis
Chintan Patel, Abhishek Singh 0001, James F. Plusquellic |
J. Electron. Test. | 2 |
| 2004 | Defect detection under Realistic Leakage Models using Multiple IDDQ MeasurementabstractI/sub DDQ/ or steady state current testing has been extensively used in the industry as a mainstream defect detection and reliability screen. The background leakage current has increased significantly with the advent of ultra deep submicron technologies. The increased background leakage makes it difficult to use single threshold I/sub DDQ/ testing to differentiate defect-free chips from those with defects that draw small amount of currents. Several techniques that improve the resolution of I/sub DDQ/ testing have been proposed to replace the single threshold detection scheme. However, even these techniques are challenged to detect defects in the presence of leakage currents in excess of a few mA. All of these techniques use a single I/sub DDQ/ measurement per circuit configuration for detection and thus the scalability of these techniques is limited. Quiescent signal analysis (QSA) is a novel I/sub DDQ/ defect detection and diagnosis technique that uses I/sub DDQ/ measurements at multiple chip supply pads. Implicit in our methodology is a leakage calibration technique that scales the total leakage current over multiple simultaneous measurements. This helps in decreasing the background leakage component in individual measurements and thus increases the resolution of this technique to subtle defects. The effectiveness of this technique is demonstrated in This work using simulation experiments on portion of a production power grid. Predicted chip size and leakage values from the International Technology Roadmap for semiconductors (ITRS) are used in these experiments. The performance of the proposed technique is evaluated using three different intra-die process variation distribution models. Chintan Patel, Abhishek Singh 0001, James F. Plusquellic |
ITC | 2 |
| 2004 | On-Chip Impulse Response Generation for Analog and Mixed-Signal TestingabstractA technique for testing analog and mixed-signal linear circuit components based on their impulse response (IR) signatures is presented in This work. A simple DFT structure is proposed to enable the on-chip generation of the impulse response signatures from the corresponding step responses of the circuit components. The proposed technique circumvents the need to apply pseudorandom patterns and perform complex on-chip cross-correlation for IR generation. A set of post processing steps based on cross/auto-correlation are proposed to efficiently compare IR signatures. A statistical approach based on linear regression and outlier analysis is used for defect screening. A continuous-time active state variable filter benchmark circuit is used as the device-under-test as a means of validating this technique. The detection sensitivity for shorting and open resistive faults across various defect severity levels is analyzed. The detection results are compared and shown to be superior to a typical specification based test. Abhishek Singh 0001, Chintan Patel, James F. Plusquellic |
ITC | 1 |
| 2004 | Fault Simulation Model for i{DDT} Testing: An InvestigationabstractIn today's technologies, resistive shorting and open defects are becoming more predominant. Conventional fault models, and tools based on these models are becoming inadequate in addressing these defects resulting from new failure mechanisms. In prior works i/sub DDT/ testing techniques have been shown to detect resistive defects. However, in order to incorporate i/sub DDT/ based methods into production test flows, it is necessary to develop a fault simulation strategy to enable ATPG and fault coverage to be determined. To our knowledge, no practical technique exists to perform fault simulation for i/sub DDT/ based methods. At the heart of the difficulty of developing a fault simulation strategy is the analog nature of the test observable. In this paper we investigate a fault simulation model that partitions the task of simulating the CUT (chip under test) into linear and non-linear components. We also propose a path isolation strategy for core-logic as a means of reducing the computational complexity involved in deriving i/sub DDT/ signals in the non-linear portion. More specifically an Impulse Response based method is derived to eliminate the need for transient simulations of the entire CUT. Abhishek Singh 0001, Chintan Patel, James F. Plusquellic |
VTS | 1 |
| 2003 | Comparison of Branching CORDIC ImplementationsabstractWe compare implementations of Duprat and Muller's branching CORDIC and Phatak's double step branching (DSB)-CORDIC algorithms for sine and cosine evaluation. For reference we also report on classical CORDIC implementations for the same wordlengths. We have also implemented double stepping in the classical algorithm and report on the performance of this method. CORDIC evaluation of sine and cosine includes two parts, the zeroer and the rotator. We discuss implementation issues related to the minimization of the delay of each iteration of the algorithm (including delays for both the zeroer as well the rotator). We then examine hybrid methods that select the components from different algorithms (such as a DSB zeroer together with a classical rotator or vice versa). Abhishek Singh 0001, Dhananjay S. Phatak, Tom Goff, Mike Riggs, James F. Plusquellic, Chintan Patel |
ASAP | 1 |
| 2003 | Path Delay Estimation using Power Supply Transient Signals: A Comparative Study using Fourier and Wavelet Analysis
Abhishek Singh 0001, Jitin Tharian, James F. Plusquellic |
ICCAD | 1 |
| 2003 | Power supply transient signal analysis for defect-oriented testabstractTransient signal analysis (TSA) is a testing method that is based on the analysis of a set of V/sub DD/ transient waveforms measured simultaneously at each supply port. Defect detection is performed by applying linear regression analysis to the time or frequency domain representations of these signals. Chip-wide process variation effects introduce signal variations that are correlated across the individual power port measurements. In contrast, defects introduce uncorrelated local variations across these measurements that can be detected as anomalies in the cross-correlation profile derived (using regression analysis) from the power port measurements of defect-free chips. This paper focuses on the application of TSA to the detection of delay faults. James F. Plusquellic, Abhishek Singh 0001, Chintan Patel, Anne E. Gattiker |
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. | 2 |
| 2002 | Power Supply Transient Signal Analysis Under Real Process and Test Hardware ModelsabstractA device testing method called Transient Signal Analysis (TSA) is subjected to elements of a real process and testing environment in this paper. Simulation experiments are designed to determine the effects of process skew (obtained from measured parameters of a real process) on the accuracy of TSA in estimating path delays from power supply I/sub DDT/ and V/sub DDT/ waveforms. The circuit model is designed to test TSA under deep submicron process models that incorporate advanced parameters such as transistor V/sub t/ width dependencies. Modeling elements of a testing environment including the probe card are subsequently introduced as a means of evaluating the effects of tester measurement noise in an actual implementation. Abhishek Singh 0001, James F. Plusquellic, Anne E. Gattiker |
VTS | 1 |
| 2001 | Detecting delay faults using power supply transient signal analysisabstractA delay-fault testing strategy based on the analysis of power supply transient signals is presented. The method is an extension to a Go/No-Go device testing method called Transient Signal Analysis (TSA). TSA detects defects through the analysis of a set of power supply transient waveforms in the time or frequency domain, e.g., Fourier phase components. A recent extension to TSA demonstrated a correlation between the V/sub DDT/ Fourier phase components and path delays in defect-free devices. The method proposed here is able to detect increases in delay due to resistive shorting and open defects using a similar technique. In particular simulation results show that a delay defective device can be distinguished from a defect-free device through an anomaly in the Fourier phase correlation profile of the device. Abhishek Singh 0001, Chintan Patel, Shirong Liao, James F. Plusquellic, Anne E. Gattiker |
ITC | 1 |