Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jing Chen 0026

dblp:27/4364-26 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-2672-4587ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 44% Web and social media mining · 28% Machine learning and data management · 28%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Web and social media mining
malicious behavior detection
1.012026
Live or Lie: Action-Aware Capsule Multiple Instance Learning for Risk Assessment in Live Streaming Platforms · KDD (1) 2026
Machine learning and data management › weak supervision
multiple instance learning
1.012026
Live or Lie: Action-Aware Capsule Multiple Instance Learning for Risk Assessment in Live Streaming Platforms · KDD (1) 2026
Information retrieval
retrieval-augmented generation
0.312026
Deja Vu in Plots: Leveraging Cross-Session Evidence with Retrieval-Augmented LLMs for Live Streaming Risk Assessment · SIGIR 2026
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.312026
Deja Vu in Plots: Leveraging Cross-Session Evidence with Retrieval-Augmented LLMs for Live Streaming Risk Assessment · SIGIR 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

retrieval-augmented LLM · 1.0multiple instance learning · 1.0cross-session evidence retrieval · 1.0capsule network · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Live or Lie: Action-Aware Capsule Multiple Instance Learning for Risk Assessment in Live Streaming Platforms
abstract
Live streaming has become a cornerstone of today's internet, enabling massive real-time social interactions. However, it faces severe risks arising from sparse, coordinated malicious behaviors among multiple participants, which are often concealed within normal activities and challenging to detect timely and accurately. In this work, we provide a pioneering study on risk assessment in live streaming rooms, characterized by weak supervision where only room-level labels are available. We formulate the task as a Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) problem, treating each room as a bag and defining structured user–timeslot capsules as instances. These capsules represent subsequences of user actions within specific time windows, encapsulating localized behavioral patterns.
Yiran Qiao 0003, Jing Chen 0026, Xiang Ao 0001, Qiwei Zhong, Yang Liu 0200, Qing He 0003
KDD (1)2
2026 Deja Vu in Plots: Leveraging Cross-Session Evidence with Retrieval-Augmented LLMs for Live Streaming Risk Assessment
Yiran Qiao 0003, Xiang Ao 0001, Jing Chen 0026, Yang Liu 0200, Qiwei Zhong, Qing He 0003
SIGIR3
2021 Is low-rate distributed denial of service a great threat to the Internet?
abstract
Abstract Low‐rate Distributed Denial of Service (LDDoS) attacks, in which the attackers send packets to a victim at a sufficiently low rate to avoid being detected, are considered to be a subtype of DDoS attacks and a potential threat to Internet security. However, an overwhelming attack paradigm on the Internet has rarely been reported due to the harsh requirements for launching LDDoS attacks; therefore, most existing LDDoS attacks are constructed and evaluated through theoretical deduction and/or simulation tests. In this backdrop, the authors aim to figure out what the conditions for launching a successful LDDoS attack are, and how harmful an attack could be. They first analyse the characteristics of LDDoS attacks, and derive the conditions and parameters for initiating LDDoS attacks using a queuing model. Based on the analysis results, an LDDoS algorithm is presented. Then, an LDDoS validation prototype is built on a Network Function Virtualization network to validate the derived parameters and conditions. Finally, a series of experiments are conducted on the testbed, and the results show that a successful LDDoS attack could be achieved based on the derived algorithm; however, its attack effect only lasts for a short time compared with its DDoS counterparts.
Ming Chen 0003, Jing Chen 0026, Xianglin Wei, Bing Chen 0002
IET Inf. Secur.2