VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Marcel Schaal
dblp:27/8314
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 56% Emerging computing paradigms · 26% Electronic design automation · 10% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 100% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
machine learning accelerator |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | RaPiD: AI Accelerator for Ultra-low Precision Training and Inference · ISCA 2021 Efficient AI System Design With Cross-Layer Approximate Computing · Proc. IEEE 2020 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › machine learning accelerator
DNN training accelerator |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | RaPiD: AI Accelerator for Ultra-low Precision Training and Inference · ISCA 2021 |
Emerging computing paradigms
approximate computing |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Efficient AI System Design With Cross-Layer Approximate Computing · Proc. IEEE 2020 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
approximate computing accelerator |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Efficient AI System Design With Cross-Layer Approximate Computing · Proc. IEEE 2020 |
Emerging computing paradigms › approximate computing
cross-layer approximate computing |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Efficient AI System Design With Cross-Layer Approximate Computing · Proc. IEEE 2020 |
Energy-efficient computing › energy-efficient architecture
energy-efficient accelerator |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | RaPiD: AI Accelerator for Ultra-low Precision Training and Inference · ISCA 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
neural network inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Efficient AI System Design With Cross-Layer Approximate Computing · Proc. IEEE 2020 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
fault simulation |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Efficient fault simulation on many-core processors · DAC 2010 |
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Efficient fault simulation on many-core processors · DAC 2010 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
many-core architecture |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Efficient fault simulation on many-core processors · DAC 2010 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › fault simulation
parallel fault simulation |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Efficient fault simulation on many-core processors · DAC 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
quantization · 0.9pruning · 0.9mixed-precision arithmetic · 0.9custom number representation · 0.9performance modeling · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | RaPiD: AI Accelerator for Ultra-low Precision Training and InferenceabstractThe growing prevalence and computational demands of Artificial Intelligence (AI) workloads has led to widespread use of hardware accelerators in their execution. Scaling the performance of AI accelerators across generations is pivotal to their success in commercial deployments. The intrinsic error-resilient nature of AI workloads present a unique opportunity for performance/energy improvement through precision scaling. Motivated by the recent algorithmic advances in precision scaling for inference and training, we designed RaPiD1, a 4-core AI accelerator chip supporting a spectrum of precisions, namely, 16 and 8-bit floating-point and 4 and 2-bit fixed-point. The 36mm2RaPiD chip fabricated in 7nm EUV technology delivers a peak 3.5 TFLOPS/W in HFP8 mode and 16.5 TOPS/W in INT4 mode at nominal voltage. Using a performance model calibrated to within 1% of the measurement results, we evaluated DNN inference using 4-bit fixed-point representation for a 4-core 1 RaPiD chip system and DNN training using 8-bit floating point representation for a 768 TFLOPs AI system comprising 4 32-core RaPiD chips. Our results show INT4 inference for batch size of 1 achieves 3 - 13.5 (average 7) TOPS/W and FP8 training for a mini-batch of 512 achieves a sustained 102 - 588 (average 203) TFLOPS across a wide range of applications. Swagath Venkataramani, Vijayalakshmi Srinivasan, Wei Wang 0333, Sanchari Sen, Ankur Agrawal, Monodeep Kar, Shubham Jain 0004, Alberto Mannari, Hoang Tran, Eri Ogawa, Kazuaki Ishizaki, Hiroshi Inoue, Marcel Schaal, Mauricio J. Serrano, Jungwook Choi, Xiao Sun 0013, Naigang Wang, Chia-Yu Chen, Allison Allain, James Bonanno, Nianzheng Cao, Robert Casatuta, Matthew Cohen, Bruce M. Fleischer, Michael Guillorn, Howard Haynie, Jinwook Jung, Mingu Kang, Kyu-Hyoun Kim, Siyu Koswatta, Sae Kyu Lee, Martin Lutz, Silvia M. Müller, Jinwook Oh, Ashish Ranjan 0001, Zhibin Ren, Scot Rider, Kerstin Schelm, Michael Scheuermann, Joel Silberman, Vidhi Zalani, Xin Zhang 0025, Ching Zhou, Matthew M. Ziegler, Vinay Shah, Moriyoshi Ohara, Pong-Fei Lu, Brian W. Curran, Sunil Shukla, Leland Chang, Kailash Gopalakrishnan |
ISCA | 15 |
| 2020 | Efficient AI System Design With Cross-Layer Approximate ComputingabstractAdvances in deep neural networks (DNNs) and the availability of massive real-world data have enabled superhuman levels of accuracy on many AI tasks and ushered the explosive growth of AI workloads across the spectrum of computing devices. However, their superior accuracy comes at a high computational cost, which necessitates approaches beyond traditional computing paradigms to improve their operational efficiency. Leveraging the application-level insight of error resilience, we demonstrate how approximate computing (AxC) can significantly boost the efficiency of AI platforms and play a pivotal role in the broader adoption of AI-based applications and services. To this end, we present RaPiD, a multi-tera operations per second (TOPS) AI hardware accelerator core (fabricated at 14-nm technology) that we built from the ground-up using AxC techniques across the stack including algorithms, architecture, programmability, and hardware. We highlight the workload-guided systematic explorations of AxC techniques for AI, including custom number representations, quantization/pruning methodologies, mixed-precision architecture design, instruction sets, and compiler technologies with quality programmability, employed in the RaPiD accelerator. Swagath Venkataramani, Xiao Sun 0013, Naigang Wang, Chia-Yu Chen, Jungwook Choi, Mingu Kang, Ankur Agarwal, Jinwook Oh, Shubham Jain 0004, Tina Babinsky, Nianzheng Cao, Thomas W. Fox, Bruce M. Fleischer, George Gristede, Michael Guillorn, Howard Haynie, Hiroshi Inoue, Kazuaki Ishizaki, Michael J. Klaiber, Shih-Hsien Lo, Gary W. Maier, Silvia M. Müller, Michael Scheuermann, Eri Ogawa, Marcel Schaal, Mauricio J. Serrano, Joel Silberman, Christos Vezyrtzis, Wei Wang 0333, Fanchieh Yee, Matthew M. Ziegler, Ching Zhou, Moriyoshi Ohara, Pong-Fei Lu, Brian W. Curran, Sunil Shukla, Vijayalakshmi Srinivasan, Leland Chang, Kailash Gopalakrishnan |
Proc. IEEE | 25 |
| 2016 | Test Strategies for Reconfigurable Scan NetworksabstractOn-chip infrastructure is an essential part of today's complex designs and enables their cost-efficient manufacturing and operation. The diversity and high number of infrastructure elements demands flexible and low-latency access mechanisms, such as reconfigurable scan networks (RSNs). The correct operation of the infrastructure access itself is highly important for the test of the system logic, its diagnosis, debug and bring-up, as well as post-silicon validation. Ensuring correct operation requires the thorough testing of the RSN.Because of sequential and combinational dependencies in RSN accesses, test generation for general RSNs is computationally very difficult and requires dedicated test strategies. This paper explores different test strategies for general RSNs and discusses the achieved structural fault coverage. Experimental results show that the combination of functional test heuristics together with a dedicated RSN test pattern generation approach significantly outperforms the test quality of a standard ATPG tool. Michael A. Kochte, Rafal Baranowski, Marcel Schaal, Hans-Joachim Wunderlich |
ATS | 3 |
| 2010 | Efficient fault simulation on many-core processorsabstractFault simulation is essential in test generation, design for test and reliability assessment of integrated circuits. Reliability analysis and the simulation of self-test structures are particularly computationally expensive as a large number of patterns has to be evaluated. Michael A. Kochte, Marcel Schaal, Hans-Joachim Wunderlich, Christian G. Zoellin |
DAC | 2 |