Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Arnaud Bergeron
dblp:27/8577
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Compilers and program optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
off-policy reinforcement learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Tapered Off-Policy REINFORCE - Stable and efficient reinforcement learning for large language models · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
policy gradient |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Tapered Off-Policy REINFORCE - Stable and efficient reinforcement learning for large language models · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization › policy gradient
REINFORCE |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Tapered Off-Policy REINFORCE - Stable and efficient reinforcement learning for large language models · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning from human feedback |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Tapered Off-Policy REINFORCE - Stable and efficient reinforcement learning for large language models · NeurIPS 2025 |
Compilers and program optimization
automatic differentiation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Automatic differentiation in ML: Where we are and where we should be going · NeurIPS 2018 |
Compilers and program optimization
intermediate representation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Automatic differentiation in ML: Where we are and where we should be going · NeurIPS 2018 |
Compilers and program optimization › program transformation
source-to-source transformation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Automatic differentiation in ML: Where we are and where we should be going · NeurIPS 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
monte carlo · 0.9importance sampling · 0.9KL regularization · 0.9source transformation · 0.3operator overloading · 0.3functional programming · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Tapered Off-Policy REINFORCE - Stable and efficient reinforcement learning for large language modelsabstractWe propose a new algorithm for fine-tuning large language models using reinforcement learning. Tapered Off-Policy REINFORCE (TOPR) uses an asymmetric, tapered variant of importance sampling to speed up learning while maintaining stable learning dynamics, even without the use of KL regularization. TOPR can be applied in a fully offline fashion, allows the handling of positive and negative examples in a unified framework, and benefits from the implementational simplicity that is typical of Monte Carlo algorithms. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach with a series of experiments on the GSM8K and MATH reasoning benchmarks, finding performance gains for training both a model for solution generation and as a generative verifier. We show that properly leveraging positive and negative examples alike in the off-policy regime simultaneously increases test-time accuracy and training data efficiency, all the while avoiding the ``wasted inference'' that comes with discarding negative examples. We find that this advantage persists over multiple iterations of training and can be amplified by dataset curation techniques, enabling us to match 70B-parameter model performance with 8B language models. As a corollary to this work, we find that REINFORCE's baseline parameter plays an important and unexpected role in defining dataset composition in the presence of negative examples, and is consequently critical in driving off-policy performance. Nicolas Le Roux, Marc G. Bellemare, Jonathan Lebensold, Arnaud Bergeron, Joshua Greaves, Alexandre Fréchette, Carolyne Pelletier, Eric Thibodeau-Laufer, Sándor Tóth, Sam Work |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2018 | Automatic differentiation in ML: Where we are and where we should be goingabstractWe review the current state of automatic differentiation (AD) for array programming in machine learning (ML), including the different approaches such as operator overloading (OO) and source transformation (ST) used for AD, graph-based intermediate representations for programs, and source languages. Based on these insights, we introduce a new graph-based intermediate representation (IR) which specifically aims to efficiently support fully-general AD for array programming. Unlike existing dataflow programming representations in ML frameworks, our IR naturally supports function calls, higher-order functions and recursion, making ML models easier to implement. The ability to represent closures allows us to perform AD using ST without a tape, making the resulting derivative (adjoint) program amenable to ahead-of-time optimization using tools from functional language compilers, and enabling higher-order derivatives. Lastly, we introduce a proof of concept compiler toolchain called Myia which uses a subset of Python as a front end. Bart van Merrienboer, Olivier Breuleux, Arnaud Bergeron, Pascal Lamblin |
NeurIPS | 3 |