VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Paul E. Chang
dblp:270/0387 · also Paul Edmund Chang
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 54% Deep learning architectures and training · 18% Learning paradigms · 9% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
2.4 | 4 | 2024 | Function-space Parameterization of Neural Networks for Sequential Learning · ICLR 2024 Memory-Based Dual Gaussian Processes for Sequential Learning · ICML 2023 Dual Parameterization of Sparse Variational Gaussian Processes · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
sequence modeling |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Function-space Parameterization of Neural Networks for Sequential Learning · ICLR 2024 Memory-Based Dual Gaussian Processes for Sequential Learning · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
continual learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Function-space Parameterization of Neural Networks for Sequential Learning · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Function-space Parameterization of Neural Networks for Sequential Learning · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process › sparse gaussian process
sparse variational gaussian process |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Memory-Based Dual Gaussian Processes for Sequential Learning · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Dual Parameterization of Sparse Variational Gaussian Processes · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
approximate bayesian inference |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | State Space Expectation Propagation: Efficient Inference Schemes for Temporal Gaussian Processes · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
expectation propagation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | State Space Expectation Propagation: Efficient Inference Schemes for Temporal Gaussian Processes · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › time series analysis › bayesian filtering and smoothing
kalman smoothing |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | State Space Expectation Propagation: Efficient Inference Schemes for Temporal Gaussian Processes · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Memory-Based Dual Gaussian Processes for Sequential Learning · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient-based optimization › gradient descent
natural gradient descent |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Dual Parameterization of Sparse Variational Gaussian Processes · NeurIPS 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variational inference · 1.1sparsification · 0.8gaussian process · 0.8function-space parameterization · 0.8dual sparse variational gaussian process · 0.7sparse variational gaussian process · 0.5natural gradient descent · 0.5dual parameterization · 0.5unscented transform · 0.4linearization · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Amortized Probabilistic Conditioning for Optimization, Simulation and InferenceabstractAmortized meta-learning methods based on pre-training have propelled fields like natural language processing and vision. Transformer-based neural processes and their variants are leading models for probabilistic meta-learning with a tractable objective. Often trained on synthetic data, these models implicitly capture essential latent information in the data-generation process. However, existing methods do not allow users to flexibly inject (condition on) and extract (predict) this probabilistic latent information at runtime, which is key to many tasks. We introduce the Amortized Conditioning Engine (ACE), a new transformer-based meta-learning model that explicitly represents latent variables of interest. ACE affords conditioning on both observed data and interpretable latent variables, the inclusion of priors at runtime, and outputs predictive distributions for discrete and continuous data and latents. We show ACE’s practical utility across diverse tasks such as image completion and classification, Bayesian optimization, and simulation-based inference, demonstrating how a general conditioning framework can replace task-specific solutions. Paul E. Chang, Nasrulloh R. B. S. Loka, Daolang Huang, Ulpu Remes, Samuel Kaski, Luigi Acerbi |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2024 | Function-space Parameterization of Neural Networks for Sequential LearningabstractSequential learning paradigms pose challenges for gradient-based deep learning due to difficulties incorporating new data and retaining prior knowledge. While Gaussian processes elegantly tackle these problems, they struggle with scalability and handling rich inputs, such as images. To address these issues, we introduce a technique that converts neural networks from weight space to function space, through a dual parameterization. Our parameterization offers: (*i*) a way to scale function-space methods to large data sets via sparsification, (*ii*) retention of prior knowledge when access to past data is limited, and (*iii*) a mechanism to incorporate new data without retraining. Our experiments demonstrate that we can retain knowledge in continual learning and incorporate new data efficiently. We further show its strengths in uncertainty quantification and guiding exploration in model-based RL. Further information and code is available on the project website. Aidan Scannell, Riccardo Mereu, Paul E. Chang, Ella Tamir, Joni Pajarinen, Arno Solin |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2023 | Memory-Based Dual Gaussian Processes for Sequential LearningabstractSequential learning with Gaussian processes (GPs) is challenging when access to past data is limited, for example, in continual and active learning. In such cases, errors can accumulate over time due to inaccuracies in the posterior, hyperparameters, and inducing points, making accurate learning challenging. Here, we present a method to keep all such errors in check using the recently proposed dual sparse variational GP. Our method enables accurate inference for generic likelihoods and improves learning by actively building and updating a memory of past data. We demonstrate its effectiveness in several applications involving Bayesian optimization, active learning, and continual learning. Paul E. Chang, Prakhar Verma, S. T. John, Arno Solin, Mohammad Emtiyaz Khan |
ICML | 1 |
| 2021 | Dual Parameterization of Sparse Variational Gaussian ProcessesabstractSparse variational Gaussian process (SVGP) methods are a common choice for non-conjugate Gaussian process inference because of their computational benefits. In this paper, we improve their computational efficiency by using a dual parameterization where each data example is assigned dual parameters, similarly to site parameters used in expectation propagation. Our dual parameterization speeds-up inference using natural gradient descent, and provides a tighter evidence lower bound for hyperparameter learning. The approach has the same memory cost as the current SVGP methods, but it is faster and more accurate. Vincent Adam, Paul E. Chang, Mohammad Emtiyaz Khan, Arno Solin |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2020 | State Space Expectation Propagation: Efficient Inference Schemes for Temporal Gaussian ProcessesabstractWe formulate approximate Bayesian inference in non-conjugate temporal and spatio-temporal Gaussian process models as a simple parameter update rule applied during Kalman smoothing. This viewpoint encompasses most inference schemes, including expectation propagation (EP), the classical (Extended, Unscented, etc.) Kalman smoothers, and variational inference. We provide a unifying perspective on these algorithms, showing how replacing the power EP moment matching step with linearisation recovers the classical smoothers. EP provides some benefits over the traditional methods via introduction of the so-called cavity distribution, and we combine these benefits with the computational efficiency of linearisation, providing extensive empirical analysis demonstrating the efficacy of various algorithms under this unifying framework. We provide a fast implementation of all methods in JAX. William J. Wilkinson, Paul E. Chang, Michael Riis Andersen, Arno Solin |
ICML | 2 |