VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sujit Rao
dblp:270/0971
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0009-0009-8067-952XORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Quantum computing and quantum information · 70% Computational complexity · 30% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum complexity theory
QMA |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Quantum Search-To-Decision Reductions and the State Synthesis Problem · CCC 2022 |
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum complexity theory |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Quantum Search-To-Decision Reductions and the State Synthesis Problem · CCC 2022 |
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum computing
quantum state preparation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Quantum Search-To-Decision Reductions and the State Synthesis Problem · CCC 2022 |
Computational complexity › reduction
search-to-decision reduction |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Quantum Search-To-Decision Reductions and the State Synthesis Problem · CCC 2022 |
Computational complexity › relativization
oracle separation |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Quantum Search-To-Decision Reductions and the State Synthesis Problem · CCC 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
query complexity · 0.6quantum oracle · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Quantum Search-To-Decision Reductions and the State Synthesis ProblemabstractIt is a useful fact in classical computer science that many search problems are reducible to decision problems; this has led to decision problems being regarded as the $\textit{de facto}$ computational task to study in complexity theory. In this work, we explore search-to-decision reductions for quantum search problems, wherein a quantum algorithm makes queries to a classical decision oracle to output a desired quantum state. In particular, we focus on search-to-decision reductions for $\mathsf{QMA}$, and show that there exists a quantum polynomial-time algorithm that can generate a witness for a $\mathsf{QMA}$ problem up to inverse polynomial precision by making one query to a $\mathsf{PP}$ decision oracle. We complement this result by showing that $\mathsf{QMA}$-search does $\textit{not}$ reduce to $\mathsf{QMA}$-decision in polynomial-time, relative to a quantum oracle. We also explore the more general $\textit{state synthesis problem}$, in which the goal is to efficiently synthesize a target state by making queries to a classical oracle encoding the state. We prove that there exists a classical oracle with which any quantum state can be synthesized to inverse polynomial precision using only one oracle query and to inverse exponential precision using two oracle queries. This answers an open question of Aaronson from 2016, who presented a state synthesis algorithm that makes $O(n)$ queries to a classical oracle to prepare an $n$-qubit state, and asked if the query complexity could be made sublinear. Sandy Irani, Anand Natarajan 0001, Chinmay Nirkhe, Sujit Rao, Henry Yuen |
CCC | 4 |