Sujit Rao

dblp:270/0971 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0009-0009-8067-952XORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Quantum computing and quantum information · 70% Computational complexity · 30%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum complexity theory
QMA
0.612022
Quantum Search-To-Decision Reductions and the State Synthesis Problem · CCC 2022
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum complexity theory
0.612022
Quantum Search-To-Decision Reductions and the State Synthesis Problem · CCC 2022
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum computing
quantum state preparation
0.612022
Quantum Search-To-Decision Reductions and the State Synthesis Problem · CCC 2022
Computational complexity › reduction
search-to-decision reduction
0.612022
Quantum Search-To-Decision Reductions and the State Synthesis Problem · CCC 2022
Computational complexity › relativization
oracle separation
0.212022
Quantum Search-To-Decision Reductions and the State Synthesis Problem · CCC 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

query complexity · 0.6quantum oracle · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Quantum Search-To-Decision Reductions and the State Synthesis Problem
abstract
It is a useful fact in classical computer science that many search problems are reducible to decision problems; this has led to decision problems being regarded as the $\textit{de facto}$ computational task to study in complexity theory. In this work, we explore search-to-decision reductions for quantum search problems, wherein a quantum algorithm makes queries to a classical decision oracle to output a desired quantum state. In particular, we focus on search-to-decision reductions for $\mathsf{QMA}$, and show that there exists a quantum polynomial-time algorithm that can generate a witness for a $\mathsf{QMA}$ problem up to inverse polynomial precision by making one query to a $\mathsf{PP}$ decision oracle. We complement this result by showing that $\mathsf{QMA}$-search does $\textit{not}$ reduce to $\mathsf{QMA}$-decision in polynomial-time, relative to a quantum oracle. We also explore the more general $\textit{state synthesis problem}$, in which the goal is to efficiently synthesize a target state by making queries to a classical oracle encoding the state. We prove that there exists a classical oracle with which any quantum state can be synthesized to inverse polynomial precision using only one oracle query and to inverse exponential precision using two oracle queries. This answers an open question of Aaronson from 2016, who presented a state synthesis algorithm that makes $O(n)$ queries to a classical oracle to prepare an $n$-qubit state, and asked if the query complexity could be made sublinear.
Sandy Irani, Anand Natarajan 0001, Chinmay Nirkhe, Sujit Rao, Henry Yuen
CCC4