Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Felix Mujkanovic

dblp:270/2188 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0009-9122-4408ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Geometric modeling and processing · 55% Image and video processing · 39% Rendering · 6%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 77% Graph learning · 23%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Geometric modeling and processing › isosurface extraction
surface extraction
0.912025
Marching Neurons: Accurate Surface Extraction for Neural Implicit Shapes · ACM Trans. Graph. 2025
Image and video processing › multiscale analysis › multiresolution analysis
gaussian scale-space
0.812024
Neural Gaussian Scale-Space Fields · ACM Trans. Graph. 2024
Geometric modeling and processing
implicit neural representation
0.812024
Neural Gaussian Scale-Space Fields · ACM Trans. Graph. 2024
Image and video processing › image representation
multiscale representation
0.812024
Neural Gaussian Scale-Space Fields · ACM Trans. Graph. 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness
0.612022
Are Defenses for Graph Neural Networks Robust? · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › adversarial machine learning › graph neural network robustness
graph adversarial defense
0.612022
Are Defenses for Graph Neural Networks Robust? · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
0.612022
Are Defenses for Graph Neural Networks Robust? · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness evaluation
0.612022
Are Defenses for Graph Neural Networks Robust? · NeurIPS 2022
Geometric modeling and processing › shape representation
implicit representation
0.312025
Marching Neurons: Accurate Surface Extraction for Neural Implicit Shapes · ACM Trans. Graph. 2025
Geometric modeling and processing › shape representation › implicit representation
signed distance function
0.312025
Marching Neurons: Accurate Surface Extraction for Neural Implicit Shapes · ACM Trans. Graph. 2025
Rendering
antialiasing
0.212024
Neural Gaussian Scale-Space Fields · ACM Trans. Graph. 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial attack
adaptive attack
0.212022
Are Defenses for Graph Neural Networks Robust? · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

parallel computation · 0.9depth-first traversal · 0.9self-supervised learning · 0.8lipschitz bounding · 0.8fourier feature modulation · 0.8black-box unit testing · 0.6adaptive attack · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Learning Image Fractals Using Chaotic Differentiable Point Splatting
abstract
Abstract Fractal geometry, defined by self‐similar patterns across scales, is crucial for understanding natural structures. This work addresses the fractal inverse problem, which involves extracting fractal codes from images to explain these patterns and synthesize them at arbitrary finer scales. We introduce a novel algorithm that optimizes Iterated Function System parameters using a custom fractal generator combined with differentiable point splatting. By integrating both stochastic and gradient‐based optimization techniques, our approach effectively navigates the complex energy landscapes typical of fractal inversion, ensuring robust performance and the ability to escape local minima. We demonstrate the method's effectiveness through comparisons with various fractal inversion techniques, highlighting its ability to recover high‐quality fractal codes and perform extensive zoom‐ins to reveal intricate patterns from just a single image.
Adarsh Djeacoumar, Felix Mujkanovic, Hans-Peter Seidel, Thomas Leimkühler
Comput. Graph. Forum2
2025 Marching Neurons: Accurate Surface Extraction for Neural Implicit Shapes
abstract
Accurate surface geometry representation is crucial in 3D visual computing. Explicit representations, such as polygonal meshes, and implicit representations, like signed distance functions, each have distinct advantages, making efficient conversions between them increasingly important. Conventional surface extraction methods for implicit representations, such as the widely used Marching Cubes algorithm, rely on spatial decomposition and sampling, leading to inaccuracies due to fixed and limited resolution. We introduce a novel approach for analytically extracting surfaces from neural implicit functions. Our method operates natively in parallel and can navigate large neural architectures. By leveraging the fact that each neuron partitions the domain, we develop a depth-first traversal strategy to efficiently track the encoded surface. The resulting meshes faithfully capture the full geometric information from the network without ad-hoc spatial discretization, achieving unprecedented accuracy across diverse shapes and network architectures while maintaining competitive speed.
Christian Stippel, Felix Mujkanovic, Thomas Leimkühler, Pedro Hermosilla
ACM Trans. Graph.2
2024 Neural Gaussian Scale-Space Fields
abstract
Gaussian scale spaces are a cornerstone of signal representation and processing, with applications in filtering, multiscale analysis, anti-aliasing, and many more. However, obtaining such a scale space is costly and cumbersome, in particular for continuous representations such as neural fields. We present an efficient and lightweight method to learn the fully continuous, anisotropic Gaussian scale space of an arbitrary signal. Based on Fourier feature modulation and Lipschitz bounding, our approach is trained self-supervised, i.e., training does not require any manual filtering. Our neural Gaussian scale-space fields faithfully capture multiscale representations across a broad range of modalities, and support a diverse set of applications. These include images, geometry, light-stage data, texture anti-aliasing, and multiscale optimization.
Felix Mujkanovic, Ntumba Elie Nsampi, Christian Theobalt, Hans-Peter Seidel, Thomas Leimkühler
ACM Trans. Graph.1
2022 Are Defenses for Graph Neural Networks Robust?
abstract
A cursory reading of the literature suggests that we have made a lot of progress in designing effective adversarial defenses for Graph Neural Networks (GNNs). Yet, the standard methodology has a serious flaw – virtually all of the defenses are evaluated against non-adaptive attacks leading to overly optimistic robustness estimates. We perform a thorough robustness analysis of 7 of the most popular defenses spanning the entire spectrum of strategies, i.e., aimed at improving the graph, the architecture, or the training. The results are sobering – most defenses show no or only marginal improvement compared to an undefended baseline. We advocate using custom adaptive attacks as a gold standard and we outline the lessons we learned from successfully designing such attacks. Moreover, our diverse collection of perturbed graphs forms a (black-box) unit test offering a first glance at a model's robustness.
Felix Mujkanovic, Simon Geisler, Stephan Günnemann, Aleksandar Bojchevski
NeurIPS1