Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zixin Hu
dblp:270/3167
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 67% Representation and self-supervised learning · 33% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video processing · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Medical and health informatics › medical report generation
radiology report generation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | PET2Rep: Towards Vision-Language Model-Drived Automated Radiology Report Generation for Positron Emission Tomography · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › sparse bayesian learning
automatic relevance determination |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Efficient Network Automatic Relevance Determination · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › gaussian graphical model
precision matrix estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Efficient Network Automatic Relevance Determination · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction › feature selection
sparse feature selection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Efficient Network Automatic Relevance Determination · ICML 2025 |
Image and video processing › biomedical image analysis
medical image analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | PET2Rep: Towards Vision-Language Model-Drived Automated Radiology Report Generation for Positron Emission Tomography · AAAI 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
vision-language model · 2.0diffusion model · 2.0surrogate function method · 0.9sequential feature evaluation · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | PET2Rep: Towards Vision-Language Model-Drived Automated Radiology Report Generation for Positron Emission TomographyabstractPositron emission tomography (PET) is a cornerstone of modern oncologic and neurologic imaging, distinguished by its unique ability to illuminate dynamic metabolic processes that transcend the anatomical focus of traditional imaging technologies. Radiology reports are essential for clinical decision making, yet their manual creation is labor-intensive and time-consuming. Recent advancements of vision-language models (VLMs) have shown strong potential in medical applications, presenting a promising avenue for automating report generation. However, existing applications of VLMs in the medical domain have predominantly focused on structural imaging modalities, while the unique characteristics of molecular PET imaging have largely been overlooked. To bridge the gap, we introduce PET2Rep, a large-scale comprehensive benchmark for evaluation of general and medical VLMs for radiology report generation for PET images. PET2Rep stands out as the first dedicated dataset for PET report generation with metabolic information, uniquely capturing whole-body image-report pairs that cover dozens of organs to fill the critical gap in existing benchmarks and mirror real-world clinical comprehensiveness. In addition to widely recognized natural language generation metrics, we introduce a series of clinical efficiency metrics to evaluate the quality of radiotracer uptake pattern description in key organs in generated reports. We conduct a head-to-head comparison of 30 cutting-edge general-purpose and medical-specialized VLMs. The results show that the current state-of-the-art VLMs perform poorly on PET report generation task, falling considerably short of fulfilling practical needs. Moreover, we identify several key insufficiency that need to be addressed to advance the development in medical applications. We believe PET2Rep will serve as a platform for the development and application of VLMs for PET imaging, accelerating the development of trustworthy reporting tools that can genuinely alleviate radiologist burden and enhance patient care. Yichi Zhang 0007, Zehui Ling, Sisi Peng, Deshu Chen, Lanlan Li, Limei Han, Zixin Hu, Yuan Qi 0001, Le Xue |
AAAI | 13 |
| 2026 | Weight-Instance Early Fusion for Neural Multi-Objective Combinatorial Optimization
Zixin Hu, Yuan Liu 0026, Jinhua Zheng |
PPSN (2) | 1 |
| 2025 | Efficient Network Automatic Relevance DeterminationabstractWe propose Network Automatic Relevance Determination (NARD), an extension of ARD for linearly probabilistic models, to simultaneously model sparse relationships between inputs $X \in \mathbb R^{d \times N}$ and outputs $Y \in \mathbb R^{m \times N}$, while capturing the correlation structure among the $Y$. NARD employs a matrix normal prior which contains a sparsity-inducing parameter to identify and discard irrelevant features, thereby promoting sparsity in the model. Algorithmically, it iteratively updates both the precision matrix and the relationship between $Y$ and the refined inputs. To mitigate the computational inefficiencies of the $\mathcal O(m^3 + d^3)$ cost per iteration, we introduce Sequential NARD, which evaluates features sequentially, and a Surrogate Function Method, leveraging an efficient approximation of the marginal likelihood and simplifying the calculation of determinant and inverse of an intermediate matrix. Combining the Sequential update with the Surrogate Function method further reduces computational costs. The computational complexity per iteration for these three methods is reduced to $\mathcal O(m^3+p^3)$, $\mathcal O(m^3 + d^2)$, $\mathcal O(m^3+p^2)$ respectively, where $p \ll d$ is the final number of features in the model. Our methods demonstrate significant improvements in computational efficiency with comparable performance on both synthetic and real-world datasets. Ziqi Ye, Xin Guo 0010, Zenglin Xu, Zixin Hu, Yuan Qi 0001 |
ICML | 7 |
| 2025 | I2HGNN: Iterative Interpretable HyperGraph Neural Network for semi-supervised classification
Saizhuo Wang, Zixin Hu, Yuan Qi 0001, Zengfeng Huang |
Neural Networks | 3 |