Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

A. Erbil Payzin

dblp:270/3579 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1983
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Physical-layer communications · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Physical-layer communications › synchronization
bit synchronization
0.011983
Analysis of a Digital Bit Synchronizer · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1983
Physical-layer communications
synchronization
0.011983
Analysis of a Digital Bit Synchronizer · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1983
Physical-layer communications
modulation and detection
0.011983
Analysis of a Digital Bit Synchronizer · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1983

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

finite-state markov chain · 0.0computer simulation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1983 Analysis of a Digital Bit Synchronizer
abstract
A simple digital bit synchronizer utilizing discrete phase control is discussed. The proposed system is intended for operation with NRZ coded binary signals. A finite state Markov chain model is used to evaluate the steady-state phase jitter performance of the bit synchronizer in the presence of additive white Gaussian noise. The theoretical results are confirmed by computer simulation. The same mathematical model is used to investigate the transient (acquisition) performance of the synchronizer. Finally, the performance of the synchronizer as a data detector is discussed and the error probability performance is compared with that of the optimum detector.
A. Erbil Payzin
IEEE Trans. Commun.1