Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lena Funcke

dblp:270/3670 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-5022-9506ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Optimization for machine learning · 100%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Quantum computing and quantum information · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization
1.422024
Adaptive Observation Cost Control for Variational Quantum Eigensolvers · ICML 2024
Physics-Informed Bayesian Optimization of Variational Quantum Circuits · NeurIPS 2023
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum algorithms
1.422024
Adaptive Observation Cost Control for Variational Quantum Eigensolvers · ICML 2024
Physics-Informed Bayesian Optimization of Variational Quantum Circuits · NeurIPS 2023
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum algorithms
variational quantum eigensolver
1.422024
Adaptive Observation Cost Control for Variational Quantum Eigensolvers · ICML 2024
Physics-Informed Bayesian Optimization of Variational Quantum Circuits · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
model-based optimization
0.812024
Adaptive Observation Cost Control for Variational Quantum Eigensolvers · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
acquisition function
0.712023
Physics-Informed Bayesian Optimization of Variational Quantum Circuits · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sequential minimal optimization · 1.5gaussian process · 1.5bayesian optimization · 1.3VQE-kernel · 1.3EMICoRe · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Adaptive Observation Cost Control for Variational Quantum Eigensolvers
abstract
The objective to be minimized in the variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) has a restricted form, which allows a specialized sequential minimal optimization (SMO) that requires only a few observations in each iteration. However, the SMO iteration is still costly due to the observation noise—one observation at a point typically requires averaging over hundreds to thousands of repeated quantum measurement shots for achieving a reasonable noise level. In this paper, we propose an adaptive cost control method, named subspace in confident region (SubsCoRe), for SMO. SubsCoRe uses the Gaussian process (GP) surrogate, and requires it to have low uncertainty over the subspace being updated, so that optimization in each iteration is performed with guaranteed accuracy. Adaptive cost control is performed by setting the required accuracy according to the progress of the optimization, and identifying the minimum number of measurement shots, as well as their distribution, satisfying the SubsCoRe requirement.
Christopher J. Anders, Kim Nicoli, Bingting Wu, Naima Elosegui, Samuele Pedrielli, Lena Funcke, Karl Jansen, Stefan Kühn, Shinichi Nakajima
ICML6
2023 Physics-Informed Bayesian Optimization of Variational Quantum Circuits
abstract
In this paper, we propose a novel and powerful method to harness Bayesian optimization for variational quantum eigensolvers (VQEs) - a hybrid quantum-classical protocol used to approximate the ground state of a quantum Hamiltonian. Specifically, we derive a *VQE-kernel* which incorporates important prior information about quantum circuits: the kernel feature map of the VQE-kernel exactly matches the known functional form of the VQE's objective function and thereby significantly reduces the posterior uncertainty. Moreover, we propose a novel acquisition function for Bayesian optimization called \emph{Expected Maximum Improvement over Confident Regions} (EMICoRe) which can actively exploit the inductive bias of the VQE-kernel by treating regions with low predictive uncertainty as indirectly "observed". As a result, observations at as few as three points in the search domain are sufficient to determine the complete objective function along an entire one-dimensional subspace of the optimization landscape. Our numerical experiments demonstrate that our approach improves over state-of-the-art baselines.
Kim Nicoli, Christopher J. Anders, Lena Funcke, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Stefan Kühn, Klaus-Robert Müller, Paolo Stornati, Pan Kessel, Shinichi Nakajima
NeurIPS3
2021 Best-approximation error for parametric quantum circuits
abstract
In Variational Quantum Simulations, the construction of a suitable parametric quantum circuit is subject to two counteracting effects. The number of parameters should be small for the device noise to be manageable, but also large enough for the circuit to be able to represent the solution. Dimensional expressivity analysis can optimize a candidate circuit considering both aspects. In this article, we will first discuss an inductive construction for such candidate circuits. Furthermore, it is sometimes necessary to choose a circuit with fewer parameters than necessary to represent all relevant states. To characterize such circuits, we estimate the best-approximation error using Voronoi diagrams. Moreover, we discuss a hybrid quantum-classical algorithm to estimate the worst-case best-approximation error, its complexity, and its scaling in state space dimensionality. This allows us to identify some obstacles for variational quantum simulations with local optimizers and underparametrized circuits, and we discuss possible remedies.
Lena Funcke, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Stefan Kühn, Manuel Schneider, Paolo Stornati
ICWS1