Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Vasu Singla

dblp:270/9234 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
2as first author
9since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 2 first-author · 9 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 1 first-author · 5 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
7 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 36% Generative modeling · 30% Deep learning architectures and training · 14%
Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Rendering · 75% Image and video coding · 25%
Network and information security
2 papers
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 20 heaviest of 21, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Rendering › gaussian splatting
3d gaussian splatting
1.722025
PUP 3D-GS: Principled Uncertainty Pruning for 3D Gaussian Splatting · CVPR 2025
Speedy-Splat: Fast 3D Gaussian Splatting with Sparse Pixels and Sparse Primitives · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
1.322023
Understanding and Mitigating Copying in Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2023
Diffusion Art or Digital Forgery? Investigating Data Replication in Diffusion Models · CVPR 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative model evaluation
training data replication
1.322023
Understanding and Mitigating Copying in Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2023
Diffusion Art or Digital Forgery? Investigating Data Replication in Diffusion Models · CVPR 2023
Security and privacy of machine learning
poisoning attack
1.222023
What Can We Learn from Unlearnable Datasets? · NeurIPS 2023
Autoregressive Perturbations for Data Poisoning · NeurIPS 2022
Security and privacy of machine learning › poisoning attack
unlearnable examples
1.222023
What Can We Learn from Unlearnable Datasets? · NeurIPS 2023
Autoregressive Perturbations for Data Poisoning · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness
1.022021
Shift Invariance Can Reduce Adversarial Robustness · NeurIPS 2021
Low Curvature Activations Reduce Overfitting in Adversarial Training · ICCV 2021
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model
0.912025
Zero-Shot Vision Encoder Grafting via LLM Surrogates · ICCV 2025
Image and video coding
model compression
0.912025
PUP 3D-GS: Principled Uncertainty Pruning for 3D Gaussian Splatting · CVPR 2025
Rendering › rendering optimization
rendering acceleration
0.912025
Speedy-Splat: Fast 3D Gaussian Splatting with Sparse Pixels and Sparse Primitives · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
privacy and data protection
0.712023
Diffusion Art or Digital Forgery? Investigating Data Replication in Diffusion Models · CVPR 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › privacy
privacy and memorization
0.712023
Understanding and Mitigating Copying in Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › text-to-image generation
text-to-image diffusion model
0.712023
Understanding and Mitigating Copying in Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › privacy
training data memorization
0.712023
Diffusion Art or Digital Forgery? Investigating Data Replication in Diffusion Models · CVPR 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
activation function
0.512021
Low Curvature Activations Reduce Overfitting in Adversarial Training · ICCV 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness
adversarial training
0.512021
Low Curvature Activations Reduce Overfitting in Adversarial Training · ICCV 2021
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network
0.512021
Shift Invariance Can Reduce Adversarial Robustness · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.512021
Low Curvature Activations Reduce Overfitting in Adversarial Training · ICCV 2021
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › convolutional neural network
translation invariance
0.512021
Shift Invariance Can Reduce Adversarial Robustness · NeurIPS 2021
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification
0.422023
What Can We Learn from Unlearnable Datasets? · NeurIPS 2023
Autoregressive Perturbations for Data Poisoning · NeurIPS 2022
Information retrieval
image retrieval
0.212023
Diffusion Art or Digital Forgery? Investigating Data Replication in Diffusion Models · CVPR 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

adversarial training · 1.6orthogonal projection attack · 1.3image retrieval frameworks · 1.3autoregressive perturbation · 1.1zero-shot grafting · 0.9sparse pixel optimization · 0.9sensitivity pruning · 0.9second-order approximation · 0.9prune-refine pipeline · 0.9gaussian pruning · 0.9diffusion model · 0.7data augmentation · 0.7caption randomization · 0.7infinitely wide network theory · 0.5activation function design · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Speedy-Splat: Fast 3D Gaussian Splatting with Sparse Pixels and Sparse Primitives
abstract
3D Gaussian Splatting (3D-GS) is a recent 3D scene reconstruction technique that enables real-time rendering of novel views by modeling scenes as parametric point clouds of differentiable 3D Gaussians. However, its rendering speed and model size still present bottlenecks, especially in resource-constrained settings. In this paper, we identify and address two key inefficiencies in 3D-GS to substantially improve rendering speed. These improvements also yield the ancillary benefits of reduced model size and training time. First, we optimize the rendering pipeline to precisely localize Gaussians in the scene, boosting rendering speed without altering visual fidelity. Second, we introduce a novel pruning technique and integrate it into the training pipeline, significantly reducing model size and training time while further raising rendering speed. Our Speedy-Splat approach combines these techniques to accelerate average rendering speed by a drastic 6.71× across scenes from the Mip-NeRF 360, Tanks & Temples, and Deep Blending datasets. Code and additional visualizations are available at https://speedysplat.github.io/.
Alex Hanson 0002, Allen Tu, Geng Lin, Vasu Singla, Matthias Zwicker, Tom Goldstein
CVPR4
2025 PUP 3D-GS: Principled Uncertainty Pruning for 3D Gaussian Splatting
abstract
Recent advances in novel view synthesis have enabled real-time rendering speeds with high reconstruction accuracy. 3D Gaussian Splatting (3D-GS), a foundational point-based parametric 3D scene representation, models scenes as large sets of 3D Gaussians. However, complex scenes can consist of millions of Gaussians, resulting in high storage and memory requirements that limit the viability of 3D-GS on devices with limited resources. Current techniques for compressing these pretrained models by pruning Gaussians rely on combining heuristics to determine which Gaussians to remove. At high compression ratios, these pruned scenes suffer from heavy degradation of visual fidelity and loss of foreground details. In this paper, we propose a principled sensitivity pruning score that preserves visual fidelity and foreground details at significantly higher compression ratios than existing approaches. It is computed as a second-order approximation of the reconstruction error on the training views with respect to the spatial parameters of each Gaussian. Additionally, we propose a multi-round prune-refine pipeline that can be applied to any pretrained 3D-GS model without changing its training pipeline. After pruning 90 % of Gaussians, a substantially higher percentage than previous methods, our PUP 3D-GS pipeline increases average rendering speed by 3.56× while retaining more salient foreground information and achieving higher image quality metrics than existing techniques on scenes from the Mip-NeRF 360, Tanks & Temples, and Deep Blending datasets. Code and additional visualizations are available at https://pup3dgs.github.io/.
Alex Hanson 0002, Allen Tu, Vasu Singla, Mayuka Jayawardhana, Matthias Zwicker, Tom Goldstein
CVPR3
2025 Zero-Shot Vision Encoder Grafting via LLM Surrogates
abstract
Vision language models (VLMs) typically pair a modestly sized vision encoder with a large language model (LLM), e.g., Llama-70B, making the decoder the primary computational burden during training. To reduce costs, a potential promising strategy is to first train the vision encoder using a small language model before transferring it to the large one. We construct small "surrogate models" that share the same embedding space and representation language as the large target LLM by directly inheriting its shallow layers. Vision encoders trained on the surrogate can then be directly transferred to the larger model, a process we call zero-shot grafting -- when plugged directly into the full-size target LLM, the grafted pair surpasses the encoder-surrogate pair and, on some benchmarks, even performs on par with full decoder training with the target LLM. Furthermore, our surrogate training approach reduces overall VLM training costs by ~45% when using Llama-70B as the decoder. The code is at https://github.com/facebookresearch/zero.
Kaiyu Yue, Vasu Singla, Menglin Jia, John Kirchenbauer, Rifaa Qadri, Zikui Cai, Abhinav Bhatele, Furong Huang, Tom Goldstein
ICCV2
2023 Diffusion Art or Digital Forgery? Investigating Data Replication in Diffusion Models
abstract
Cutting-edge diffusion models produce images with high quality and customizability, enabling them to be used for commercial art and graphic design purposes. But do diffusion models create unique works of art, or are they replicating content directly from their training sets? In this work, we study image retrieval frameworks that enable us to compare generated images with training samples and detect when content has been replicated. Applying our frameworks to diffusion models trained on multiple datasets including Oxford flowers, Celeb-A, ImageNet, and LAION, we discuss how factors such as training set size impact rates of content replication. We also identify cases where diffusion models, including the popular Stable Diffusion model, blatantly copy from their training data. Project page: https://somepago.github.io/diffrep.html
Gowthami Somepalli, Vasu Singla, Micah Goldblum, Jonas Geiping, Tom Goldstein
CVPR2
2023 What Can We Learn from Unlearnable Datasets?
abstract
In an era of widespread web scraping, unlearnable dataset methods have the potential to protect data privacy by preventing deep neural networks from generalizing. But in addition to a number of practical limitations that make their use unlikely, we make a number of findings that call into question their ability to safeguard data. First, it is widely believed that neural networks trained on unlearnable datasets only learn shortcuts, simpler rules that are not useful for generalization. In contrast, we find that networks actually can learn useful features that can be reweighed for high test performance, suggesting that image protection is not assured. Unlearnable datasets are also believed to induce learning shortcuts through linear separability of added perturbations. We provide a counterexample, demonstrating that linear separability of perturbations is not a necessary condition. To emphasize why linearly separable perturbations should not be relied upon, we propose an orthogonal projection attack which allows learning from unlearnable datasets published in ICML 2021 and ICLR 2023. Our proposed attack is significantly less complex than recently proposed techniques.
Pedro Sandoval Segura, Vasu Singla, Jonas Geiping, Micah Goldblum, Tom Goldstein
NeurIPS2
2023 Understanding and Mitigating Copying in Diffusion Models
abstract
Images generated by diffusion models like Stable Diffusion are increasingly widespread. Recent works and even lawsuits have shown that these models are prone to replicating their training data, unbeknownst to the user. In this paper, we first analyze this memorization problem in text-to-image diffusion models. While it is widely believed that duplicated images in the training set are responsible for content replication at inference time, we observe that the text conditioning of the model plays a similarly important role. In fact, we see in our experiments that data replication often does not happen for unconditional models, while it is common in the text-conditional case. Motivated by our findings, we then propose several techniques for reducing data replication at both training and inference time by randomizing and augmenting image captions in the training set. Code is available at https://github.com/somepago/DCR.
Gowthami Somepalli, Vasu Singla, Micah Goldblum, Jonas Geiping, Tom Goldstein
NeurIPS2
2022 Autoregressive Perturbations for Data Poisoning
abstract
The prevalence of data scraping from social media as a means to obtain datasets has led to growing concerns regarding unauthorized use of data. Data poisoning attacks have been proposed as a bulwark against scraping, as they make data ``unlearnable'' by adding small, imperceptible perturbations. Unfortunately, existing methods require knowledge of both the target architecture and the complete dataset so that a surrogate network can be trained, the parameters of which are used to generate the attack. In this work, we introduce autoregressive (AR) poisoning, a method that can generate poisoned data without access to the broader dataset. The proposed AR perturbations are generic, can be applied across different datasets, and can poison different architectures. Compared to existing unlearnable methods, our AR poisons are more resistant against common defenses such as adversarial training and strong data augmentations. Our analysis further provides insight into what makes an effective data poison.
Pedro Sandoval Segura, Vasu Singla, Jonas Geiping, Micah Goldblum, Tom Goldstein, David Jacobs 0001
NeurIPS2
2021 Low Curvature Activations Reduce Overfitting in Adversarial Training
abstract
Adversarial training is one of the most effective defenses against adversarial attacks. Previous works suggest that overfitting is a dominant phenomenon in adversarial training leading to a large generalization gap between test and train accuracy in neural networks. In this work, we show that the observed generalization gap is closely related to the choice of the activation function. In particular, we show that using activation functions with low (exact or approximate) curvature values has a regularization effect that significantly reduces both the standard and robust generalization gaps in adversarial training. We observe this effect for both differentiable/smooth activations such as SiLU as well as non-differentiable/non-smooth activations such as LeakyReLU. In the latter case, the "approximate" curvature of the activation is low. Finally, we show that for activation functions with low curvature, the double descent phenomenon for adversarially trained models does not occur.
Vasu Singla, Sahil Singla 0002, Soheil Feizi, David Jacobs 0001
ICCV1
2021 Shift Invariance Can Reduce Adversarial Robustness
abstract
Shift invariance is a critical property of CNNs that improves performance on classification. However, we show that invariance to circular shifts can also lead to greater sensitivity to adversarial attacks. We first characterize the margin between classes when a shift-invariant {\em linear} classifier is used. We show that the margin can only depend on the DC component of the signals. Then, using results about infinitely wide networks, we show that in some simple cases, fully connected and shift-invariant neural networks produce linear decision boundaries. Using this, we prove that shift invariance in neural networks produces adversarial examples for the simple case of two classes, each consisting of a single image with a black or white dot on a gray background. This is more than a curiosity; we show empirically that with real datasets and realistic architectures, shift invariance reduces adversarial robustness. Finally, we describe initial experiments using synthetic data to probe the source of this connection.
Vasu Singla, Songwei Ge, Ronen Basri, David Jacobs 0001
NeurIPS1