Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jan Niklas Böhm
dblp:270/9446
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Visualization and visual analytics · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
2.2 | 3 | 2025 | TRACE: Contrastive learning for multi-trial time series data in neuroscience · NeurIPS 2025 From $t$-SNE to UMAP with contrastive learning · ICLR 2023 Unsupervised visualization of image datasets using contrastive learning · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
t-SNE |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | From $t$-SNE to UMAP with contrastive learning · ICLR 2023 Attraction-Repulsion Spectrum in Neighbor Embeddings · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Visualization and visual analytics
dimensionality reduction |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Unsupervised visualization of image datasets using contrastive learning · ICLR 2023 Attraction-Repulsion Spectrum in Neighbor Embeddings · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics
neural data analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | TRACE: Contrastive learning for multi-trial time series data in neuroscience · NeurIPS 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics › neural data analysis
neural population decoding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | TRACE: Contrastive learning for multi-trial time series data in neuroscience · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
dimensionality reduction |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | From $t$-SNE to UMAP with contrastive learning · ICLR 2023 |
Visualization and visual analytics › dimensionality reduction
neighbor embedding |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Attraction-Repulsion Spectrum in Neighbor Embeddings · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
contrastive learning · 3.7neighbor embedding · 1.7t-SNE · 1.3negative sampling · 1.1attractive-repulsive force · 1.1hypersphere embedding · 0.9cosine similarity · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | On the Importance of Embedding Norms in Self-Supervised LearningabstractSelf-supervised learning (SSL) allows training data representations without a supervised signal and has become an important paradigm in machine learning. Most SSL methods employ the cosine similarity between embedding vectors and hence effectively embed data on a hypersphere. While this seemingly implies that embedding norms cannot play any role in SSL, a few recent works have suggested that embedding norms have properties related to network convergence and confidence. In this paper, we resolve this apparent contradiction and systematically establish the embedding norm's role in SSL training. Using theoretical analysis, simulations, and experiments, we show that embedding norms (i) govern SSL convergence rates and (ii) encode network confidence, with smaller norms corresponding to unexpected samples. Additionally, we show that manipulating embedding norms can have large effects on convergence speed.
Our findings demonstrate that SSL embedding norms are integral to understanding and optimizing network behavior. Andrew Draganov, Sharvaree Vadgama, Sebastian Damrich, Jan Niklas Böhm, Lucas Maes, Dmitry Kobak, Erik J. Bekkers |
ICML | 4 |
| 2025 | TRACE: Contrastive learning for multi-trial time series data in neuroscienceabstractModern neural recording techniques such as two-photon imaging or Neuropixel probes allow to acquire vast time-series datasets with responses of hundreds or thousands of neurons. Contrastive learning is a powerful self-supervised framework for learning representations of complex datasets. Existing applications for neural time series rely on generic data augmentations and do not exploit the multi-trial data structure inherent in many neural datasets. Here we present TRACE, a new contrastive learning framework that averages across different subsets of trials to generate positive pairs. TRACE allows to directly learn a two-dimensional embedding, combining ideas from contrastive learning and neighbor embeddings. We show that TRACE outperforms other methods, resolving fine response differences in simulated data. Further, using in vivo recordings, we show that the representations learned by TRACE capture both biologically relevant continuous variation, cell-type-related cluster structure, and can assist data quality control. Lisa Schmors, Dominic Gonschorek, Jan Niklas Böhm, Yongrong Qiu, Na Zhou, Dmitry Kobak, Andreas S. Tolias, Fabian H. Sinz, Jacob Reimer, Katrin Franke, Sebastian Damrich, Philipp Berens |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2023 | Unsupervised visualization of image datasets using contrastive learning
Jan Niklas Böhm, Philipp Berens, Dmitry Kobak |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2023 | From $t$-SNE to UMAP with contrastive learning
Sebastian Damrich, Jan Niklas Böhm, Fred A. Hamprecht, Dmitry Kobak |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2022 | Attraction-Repulsion Spectrum in Neighbor EmbeddingsabstractNeighbor embeddings are a family of methods for visualizing complex high-dimensional data sets using kNN graphs. To find the low-dimensional embedding, these algorithms combine an attractive force between neighboring pairs of points with a repulsive force between all points. One of the most popular examples of such algorithms is t-SNE. Here we empirically show that changing the balance between the attractive and the repulsive forces in t-SNE using the exaggeration parameter yields a spectrum of embeddings, which is characterized by a simple trade-off: stronger attraction can better represent continuous manifold structures, while stronger repulsion can better represent discrete cluster structures and yields higher kNN recall. We find that UMAP embeddings correspond to t-SNE with increased attraction; mathematical analysis shows that this is because the negative sampling optimization strategy employed by UMAP strongly lowers the effective repulsion. Likewise, ForceAtlas2, commonly used for visualizing developmental single-cell transcriptomic data, yields embeddings corresponding to t-SNE with the attraction increased even more. At the extreme of this spectrum lie Laplacian eigenmaps. Our results demonstrate that many prominent neighbor embedding algorithms can be placed onto the attraction-repulsion spectrum, and highlight the inherent trade-offs between them. Jan Niklas Böhm, Philipp Berens, Dmitry Kobak |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |