Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pierre Monmarché

dblp:271/0533 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo
0.912025
Piecewise deterministic sampling with splitting schemes · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo
piecewise deterministic markov process sampler
0.912025
Piecewise deterministic sampling with splitting schemes · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

zig-zag sampler · 0.9metropolis-hastings · 0.9bouncy particle sampler · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Piecewise deterministic sampling with splitting schemes
abstract
We introduce Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms based on numerical approximations of piecewise-deterministic Markov processes obtained with the framework of splitting schemes. We present unadjusted as well as adjusted algorithms, for which the asymptotic bias due to the discretisation error is removed applying a non-reversible Metropolis-Hastings filter. In a general framework we demonstrate that the unadjusted schemes have weak error of second order in the step size, while typically maintaining a computational cost of only one gradient evaluation of the negative log-target function per iteration. Focusing then on unadjusted schemes based on the Bouncy Particle and Zig-Zag samplers, we provide conditions ensuring geometric ergodicity and consider the expansion of the invariant measure in terms of the step size. We analyse the dependence of the leading term in this expansion on the refreshment rate and on the structure of the splitting scheme, giving a guideline on which structure is best. Finally, we illustrate promising results for our samplers with numerical experiments on a Bayesian imaging inverse problem and a system of interacting particles.
Andrea Bertazzi, Paul Dobson, Pierre Monmarché
J. Mach. Learn. Res.3