Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rahul Rahaman

dblp:271/0802 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
5since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-4260-027XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Video understanding and tracking · 55% Trustworthy machine learning · 26% Representation and self-supervised learning · 10%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
action segmentation
1.832023
C2F-TCN: A Framework for Semi- and Fully-Supervised Temporal Action Segmentation · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023
A Generalized and Robust Framework for Timestamp Supervision in Temporal Action Segmentation · ECCV (4) 2022
Iterative Contrast-Classify for Semi-supervised Temporal Action Segmentation · AAAI 2022
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › action segmentation
semi-supervised temporal action segmentation
1.222023
C2F-TCN: A Framework for Semi- and Fully-Supervised Temporal Action Segmentation · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023
Iterative Contrast-Classify for Semi-supervised Temporal Action Segmentation · AAAI 2022
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
unsupervised representation learning
0.612022
Iterative Contrast-Classify for Semi-supervised Temporal Action Segmentation · AAAI 2022
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
weakly supervised learning
0.612022
A Generalized and Robust Framework for Timestamp Supervision in Temporal Action Segmentation · ECCV (4) 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
calibration
0.512021
Uncertainty Quantification and Deep Ensembles · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › calibration
post-hoc calibration
0.512021
Uncertainty Quantification and Deep Ensembles · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation
0.512021
Uncertainty Quantification and Deep Ensembles · NeurIPS 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

contrastive learning · 1.2clustering · 1.2stochastic max-pooling · 0.7encoder-decoder architecture · 0.7temporal convolutional network · 0.6temperature scaling · 0.5mixup regularization · 0.5ensembling · 0.5data augmentation · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 C2F-TCN: A Framework for Semi- and Fully-Supervised Temporal Action Segmentation
abstract
Temporal action segmentation tags action labels for every frame in an input untrimmed video containing multiple actions in a sequence. For the task of temporal action segmentation, we propose an encoder-decoder style architecture named C2F-TCN featuring a "coarse-to-fine" ensemble of decoder outputs. The C2F-TCN framework is enhanced with a novel model agnostic temporal feature augmentation strategy formed by the computationally inexpensive strategy of the stochastic max-pooling of segments. It produces more accurate and well-calibrated supervised results on three benchmark action segmentation datasets. We show that the architecture is flexible for both supervised and representation learning. In line with this, we present a novel unsupervised way to learn frame-wise representation from C2F-TCN. Our unsupervised learning approach hinges on the clustering capabilities of the input features and the formation of multi-resolution features from the decoder's implicit structure. Further, we provide first semi-supervised temporal action segmentation results by merging representation learning with conventional supervised learning. Our semi-supervised learning scheme, called "Iterative-Contrastive-Classify (ICC)", progressively improves in performance with more labeled data. The ICC semi-supervised learning in C2F-TCN, with 40% labeled videos, performs similar to fully supervised counterparts.
Dipika Singhania, Rahul Rahaman, Angela Yao
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.2
2022 Iterative Contrast-Classify for Semi-supervised Temporal Action Segmentation
abstract
Temporal action segmentation classifies the action of each frame in (long) video sequences. Due to the high cost of frame-wise labeling, we propose the first semi-supervised method for temporal action segmentation. Our method hinges on unsupervised representation learning, which, for temporal action segmentation, poses unique challenges. Actions in untrimmed videos vary in length and have unknown labels and start/end times. Ordering of actions across videos may also vary. We propose a novel way to learn frame-wise representations from temporal convolutional networks (TCNs) by clustering input features with added time-proximity conditions and multi-resolution similarity. By merging representation learning with conventional supervised learning, we develop an "Iterative Contrast-Classify (ICC)'' semi-supervised learning scheme. With more labelled data, ICC progressively improves in performance; ICC semi-supervised learning, with 40% labelled videos, performs similarly to fully-supervised counterparts. Our ICC improves MoF by {+1.8, +5.6, +2.5}% on Breakfast, 50Salads, and GTEA respectively for 100% labelled videos.
Dipika Singhania, Rahul Rahaman, Angela Yao
AAAI2
2022 A Generalized and Robust Framework for Timestamp Supervision in Temporal Action Segmentation
Rahul Rahaman, Dipika Singhania, Alexandre H. Thiery, Angela Yao
ECCV (4)1
2022 Pretrained Equivariant Features Improve Unsupervised Landmark Discovery
abstract
Locating semantically meaningful landmark points is a crucial component of a large number of computer vision pipelines. Because of the small number of available datasets with ground truth landmark annotations, it is essential to design robust unsupervised and semi-supervised methods for landmark detection. Many of the recent unsupervised learning methods rely on the equivariance properties of landmarks to synthetic image deformations. Our work focuses on such widely used methods and sheds light on its core problem, its inability to produce equivariant intermediate convolutional features. This finding leads us to formulate a two-step unsupervised approach that overcomes this challenge by first learning powerful pixel-based features that are then exploited in a second step within standard landmark detection approaches. Our methodology produces state-of-the-art results on several benchmarks such as the BBC Pose dataset, the Cat-head dataset and performs comparably in other situations.
Rahul Rahaman, Atin Ghosh, Alexandre H. Thiery
ICPR1
2021 Uncertainty Quantification and Deep Ensembles
abstract
Deep Learning methods are known to suffer from calibration issues: they typically produce over-confident estimates. These problems are exacerbated in the low data regime. Although the calibration of probabilistic models is well studied, calibrating extremely over-parametrized models in the low-data regime presents unique challenges. We show that deep-ensembles do not necessarily lead to improved calibration properties. In fact, we show that standard ensembling methods, when used in conjunction with modern techniques such as mixup regularization, can lead to less calibrated models. This text examines the interplay between three of the most simple and commonly used approaches to leverage deep learning when data is scarce: data-augmentation, ensembling, and post-processing calibration methods. We demonstrate that, although standard ensembling techniques certainly help to boost accuracy, the calibration of deep ensembles relies on subtle trade-offs. We also find that calibration methods such as temperature scaling need to be slightly tweaked when used with deep-ensembles and, crucially, need to be executed after the averaging process. Our simulations indicate that, in the low data regime, this simple strategy can halve the Expected Calibration Error (ECE) on a range of benchmark classification problems when compared to standard deep-ensembles.
Rahul Rahaman, Alexandre H. Thiery
NeurIPS1